Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, what's up?

I'm new to this forum but i already have a question. When I was searching for the price of the east bear kit for the GTT, it was said that for perfect fitment i would have to buy the east bear bonnet or a GTR bonnet, which is cheaper, but my question is: If I buy the GTR bonnet, do I also have to buy the bonnet lip? Or I just have to buy what was said in the post?

For those who wants to see here's the link to the front bumper: http://www.knightracer.com/shop/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=187

Thanks in advance!

Cheers!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/464902-east-bear-front-bumper-and-bonnet/
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I'm looking into these also, just so damn expensive.

I think there was a package deal on eBay for a Melbourne crowd to order, fir & paint the whole lot (rear, skirts & front) for close to 2.8k

For those in Sydney, I had postage quoted up for me last week to Sydney. $150

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/172048552624?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

Looks like a nice full front end kit. I would prefer to see a kit in person before I think about purchasing tbh.

  • 3 weeks later...

The above ebay link is not genuine East Bear I bought side skirts off that seller and returned them once I received them, I even have messages on my phone of him saying they are copies once i caught him out. I have genuine East Bear front lip and skirts now you just got to suck it up and pay the $$$

  • 2 weeks later...
On 6/27/2016 at 0:04 AM, DoseVader said:

The above ebay link is not genuine East Bear I bought side skirts off that seller and returned them once I received them, I even have messages on my phone of him saying they are copies once i caught him out. I have genuine East Bear front lip and skirts now you just got to suck it up and pay the $$$

What was the overall product quality. 

8 hours ago, jmknights93 said:

What was the overall product quality. 

Typical stiff fiberglass didn't even take them out of the box to see how well they fit but $550 for copies is a bit steep considering you can get other copies out there for a lot cheaper. I wanted genuine as I am running a east bear front lip so wanted to keep the theme going. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...