Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Greetings all,

Excuse my ignorance, but what is the difference between a normal GTR and a GTR V Spec? Are there any advantages in searching and waiting to find a V Spec over the standard GTR if I am just going to modify it anyway?

There appears to be a few R32 GTR's for reasonable prices around at the moment and am looking at buying my first turboed car and my first 4WD car. My first choice just on looks is the R34, but I can not afford that right away so 32 it shall be.

Are there any traps out there for first timers such as myself?

Any help is much appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46706-v-spec-or-not/
Share on other sites

GTR-San,

Vspecs in 32 guise are different over standard ones because they came with Brembo brakes (stock 32's did not), better attessa 4wd system and stiffer suspension from what I know. The difference in the 33's is only the attessa and suspension as all 33 gtr's came with Brembo's. I think the 34's are the same as the 33's...

It's up to you, if you get a 33 for instance with coilovers then the only diff is the attessa. A vspec should cost a bit more, and the resale price will probably only reflect that amount of difference..

If you can get a mint non vspec grab it, they are no slower than a vspec....

Brett

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46706-v-spec-or-not/#findComment-947287
Share on other sites

Thanks alot for all the info, and after searching around a little bit, it seems as though it would be a much better idea to buy a car that has been modified already, to around the same extent as to what I would have.

So now the price has gone up substantially but it seems as though I will save some money this way in the long run.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46706-v-spec-or-not/#findComment-947850
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...