Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Rexbomb dollar for dollar...great car and money well spent....

pre-2001 models only...forget the newer REX it's under powered and a heavy weight...even RWD cars can flog it. I had my 2000 STI from new and on my second GTR....had to pour a lot of money into the GTR to exceed the standard of the STI, but the STI is driven everywhere and anywhere.

Krawler it's nice to dream, but wake up!

Skylinegeoff "eat it in third" sorry the race is over and the rex was backing off...look at your speedo and may be his brake lights are glowing as you pass. It's not worth the risk after 160. If you can't be in front or catch and pass within 300 metres...give it up. (the track is a different matter)

Ferni 210rwkw with less traction and all that extra weight = not enough to win....but maybe in your mind, refer comment for Skylinegeoff.

Serious-Seven try making yourself understandable...woop ass!!!!

Now take it all with a sense of humour...as I will, when the replies and excuses/reasons for Losing/winning etc come in.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 13_devil

OMG! this is a 1st, i have never seen an un-man car destroy a wrx or any car for that matter  

dude get ur P's before u come in here and talk about ur soo called "fc" destroy other peoples cars, bit hard to do that hay if u cant drive  

i second that..... lol

GTR STI .....dude i in ore of your cars... u lucky and to have to fine ass bitches like that...is it r33 or r34 gtr? wouldn't a r34 (stock) just own all....

Sorry, just stating what i have seen/experienced.... even without launching in my car i have beaten wrx's (one in particular had lightweight racing wheels and exaust from what i could see)... my mates gtst with ~210rwkw, i can't beat unless i launch. Maybe the wrx's i have come up against just have bad drivers.

LOL...... you dont believe it ?

Pfffft.. i dont care.. there is already people who have seen what i have from these forums in real life.

you two kids are just keyboard warriors.

Ok then... Christmas present from Santa? Then why did you change your thing to 'Sleeper :P'

Yeah, I learned how to use a keyboard once

And how am I a kid, your 15

I'm not even going to bother replying to any of your stupid comments on how i got my car.

I have so much to say about you but what for ? where behind keyboards and argueing... what a waste of time.

anyway, WRX's are pretty hard to beat off the lights with the usual GTS25-t you find on the street.

But since they have such short gear ratio's that launch doesnt last to long.

once you hit over 100km/h you see your car rocketing past the WRX.

anyway, WRX's are pretty hard to beat off the lights with the usual GTS25-t you find on the street.

But since they have such short gear ratio's that launch doesnt last to long.

once you hit over 100km/h you see your car rocketing past the WRX.

Are you tripping on something?, RB25 eats EJ20's... well atleast from what i have seen.

Are you tripping on something?, RB25 eats EJ20's... well atleast from what i have seen.

Sorry kid, but i think you didnt get what i was saying ? Offcourse a WRX could do a better 0-100 then a GTS25-t. But anyone in this particular forum would choose a R33 over a 99WRX ;)... i said the r33 is better.

GO THE RB25DET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sorry kid, but i think you didnt get what i was saying ? Offcourse a WRX could do a better 0-100 then a GTS25-t. But anyone in this particular forum would choose a R33 over a 99WRX ;)... i said the r33 is better.

GO THE RB25DET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Look KID, no you didnt say the R33 is better, im gonna have to shove a sign up ur ass Quoteing 'WRX's are pretty hard to beat off the lights'

I have so much to say about you but what for ?

Yeah dont worry, I know a few people on here that have much to say, to you to.

I recon I could beat a wrx to 100 pretty much every time, when my car was stock and I couldn't drive it as well as I can now it only took till about 110k's, recon I could have one easily by 80 now if I dont get it off the line anywayz!

Sorry kid, but i think you didnt get what i was saying ? Offcourse a WRX could do a better 0-100 then a GTS25-t. But anyone in this particular forum would choose a R33 over a 99WRX ;)... i said the r33 is better.

GO THE RB25DET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ding Ding Ding There goes the school bell again... Lunch time now. "Guess what guys... I got a new matchbox car today"

Rexbomb dollar for dollar...great car and money well spent....

pre-2001 models only...forget the newer REX it's under powered and a heavy weight...even RWD cars can flog it. I had my 2000 STI from new and on my second GTR....had to pour a lot of money into the GTR to exceed the standard of the STI, but the STI is driven everywhere and anywhere.

Krawler it's nice to dream, but wake up!

Skylinegeoff "eat it in third" sorry the race is over and the rex was backing off...look at your speedo and may be his brake lights are glowing as you pass. It's not worth the risk after 160. If you can't be in front or catch and pass within 300 metres...give it up. (the track is a different matter)

Ferni 210rwkw with less traction and all that extra weight = not enough to win....but maybe in your mind, refer comment for Skylinegeoff.

Serious-Seven try making yourself understandable...woop ass!!!!

Now take it all with a sense of humour...as I will, when the replies and excuses/reasons for Losing/winning etc come in.

Agreed... Take it from sum1 who's been there n done that. :throwup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...