Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was cleaning out the boot of my r32 looking for any tools or supplies that might’ve fell into the  spare tire well. I found these that the previous owner might’ve left there? Lol. Anyways don’t know what they do or are worth but I found their website and apparently they are a Canadian product. 

9F29BF38-B91D-4F59-B624-6DC1C9F31D42.png

B9517AF4-9E3E-43A8-B551-FE64C601749E.jpeg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/475267-ams-tention-rods/
Share on other sites

The caster rods control the fore-aft movement of the front lower control arm.  Without them, the lower control arm would be able to move forward and backwards in the wheel well enough to crash into the guard liner, because the bushes at the chassis end of the arm aren't designed to take loads applied in that direction.

The stock caster rods are fixed length.  No adjusting them.  The stock amount of caster in these Nissans is a bit low - only a few degrees.  More (positive) caster provides an increase in the amount of dynamic camber (camber that appears in the wheel angle as the wheel is turned in the steering axis).

The stock caster rods also feature huge rubber/hydrogooshy bushes that provide a metric shit tonne of slop.

These aftermarket caster rods provide the ability to adjust the length to get the amount of caster that you want*.  They also usually use rod end joints in place of squishy bushes, thereby completely eradicating any deflection under load.  In my experience, this is f**king Excellent (TM), as it drastically improves the behaviour of the front end.

* R32s in particular do not like having lots of caster wound into them.  You can wind more into R33s because the upper control arm design is superior.  The more you wind into an R32 the worse the twisting/binding that occurs in the upper arm and shit starts to get real with them, much worse/faster.  Therefore the limit for caster on R32s is probably 6°.  I think I'm running ~5.5°, even with tricky upper arms.

8 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

The caster rods control the fore-aft movement of the front lower control arm.  Without them, the lower control arm would be able to move forward and backwards in the wheel well enough to crash into the guard liner, because the bushes at the chassis end of the arm aren't designed to take loads applied in that direction.

The stock caster rods are fixed length.  No adjusting them.  The stock amount of caster in these Nissans is a bit low - only a few degrees.  More (positive) caster provides an increase in the amount of dynamic camber (camber that appears in the wheel angle as the wheel is turned in the steering axis).

The stock caster rods also feature huge rubber/hydrogooshy bushes that provide a metric shit tonne of slop.

These aftermarket caster rods provide the ability to adjust the length to get the amount of caster that you want*.  They also usually use rod end joints in place of squishy bushes, thereby completely eradicating any deflection under load.  In my experience, this is f**king Excellent (TM), as it drastically improves the behaviour of the front end.

* R32s in particular do not like having lots of caster wound into them.  You can wind more into R33s because the upper control arm design is superior.  The more you wind into an R32 the worse the twisting/binding that occurs in the upper arm and shit starts to get real with them, much worse/faster.  Therefore the limit for caster on R32s is probably 6°.  I think I'm running ~5.5°, even with tricky upper arms.

Hmm so these are for thE fronts eh? I would’ve assumed for the rears. 

2 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Definitely the front.  The equivalents on the rears are called "tension rods" in these cars.  You do not want to f**k about with those.  I have written many words on that subject lately, if you want a read.

And would obviously require an alignment after install yes?  Also with my new coilovers when they come in after I install them even though I’m matching the ore existing ride height do I need a re alignment?

5 minutes ago, SeanR32GtSt said:

And would obviously require an alignment after install yes?  Also with my new coilovers when they come in after I install them even though I’m matching the ore existing ride height do I need a re alignment?

If you set the length of the AMS rods to exactly the length of the stockers (to the centreline of the bolt hole through the front joint) then you won't need an alignment afterwards.  The paranoid would at least get the alignment checked, but the confident would expect the alignment to be unchanged.  Doing so would buy the benefits of reduced slop, but not the potential benefit of winding in a little more caster.  Shortening the rods would best be done AT the wheel aligners, to get the measurement you want.  If you don't know what you want, don't f**k with it.  There is plenty of reading on here to inform you though.

Changing suspension units, even with a small height change, will not require a wheel alignment.  Again, the paranoid would check, the confident would just run with it.

1 hour ago, SeanR32GtSt said:

Is there anything missing from these that would need replacing like a bush inside the endlinks before attempting to install?  And do they actually make a rattling noise?

Now that you mention it....yes, the pair of spacers that goes in the rod end on each one is missing.

Perhaps you should check to see if you have stock arm on the car, or another set of these.

And yes, when rod ends wear, you get metal to metal knocking noises.

36 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Now that you mention it....yes, the pair of spacers that goes in the rod end on each one is missing.

Perhaps you should check to see if you have stock arm on the car, or another set of these.

And yes, when rod ends wear, you get metal to metal knocking noises.

I’ll be getting under it in a few days to check. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The attached document is fine. I just downloaded & opened it.
    • Hello, sorry for being late to join the discussion, but my clock just died on me.   Ive tried to look at Michaels digital clock repair.docx and it doesnt work maybe the file has expired.   Please let me know if you can re upload it or take some youtube videos to show us how to get the clock installed? thanks
    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
×
×
  • Create New...