Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I've just been down to the local 3 shop and got a sick new phone, and i must of been in a state of "OMG i've got a new toy!!" mind and I've left my headlights on for about 3 hours.......flat battery!!!

Which brings me to my question - is it entirely safe to jump start my R33 using standard jumper leads???

Or will it result in fryed equipment namingly the ECU or Turbo timer??

Any insight into this would be helpful as I'm supposed to be going out tonight and i could really do without the Taxi fares!! (damn John Howard!!)

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/48213-jump-starting-the-beast/
Share on other sites

What does having the headlights on have to do with jumpstarting your car with an aftermarket ECU??

As long as you don't hook up the positive and negative the wrong way around you won't fry anything... its only from old crap computer equipment back 20 years ago that they had trouble with that...

What does having the headlights on have to do with jumpstarting your car with an aftermarket ECU??

As long as you don't hook up the positive and negative the wrong way around you won't fry anything... its only from old crap computer equipment back 20 years ago that they had trouble with that...

Dude you dont kow how many people ive spoken to who are still parra about jump starting their efi car.

using 1.21 jigawatts to jump start the delorian is old news with todays hardware.Like u say hook the jump start cables up right and there wont be a problem.

:rofl:

What does having the headlights on have to do with jumpstarting your car with an aftermarket ECU??

As long as you don't hook up the positive and negative the wrong way around you won't fry anything... its only from old crap computer equipment back 20 years ago that they had trouble with that...

Dude you dont kow how many people ive spoken to who are still parra about jump starting their efi car.

using 1.21 jigawatts to jump start the delorian is old news with todays hardware.Like u say hook the jump start cables up right and there wont be a problem.

Just remember to take them off when the car is started.

:rofl:

Trust33: yeah i know lots of people are paranoid about jump starting thier efi cars... i'm just trying to show how silly it is etc.. :rofl: Also dont understand the whole grounding the negative as opposed to puting it on the neg terminal - do people realise the car ground goes to the neg terminal on battery? :)

Ok well there is some misleading info in here...

This is from the best auto elec I know,

the standard and most ecu's can handle 14 volts before they fry,

When jump starting an R33 (this is what I have unsure for others) jump start from the power box under the bonnet not the battery as the ampage drain is huge from the battery in the boot to the box to the starter motor.

Start the car with the parkers/lights on, this will provide a small ampage drain and reduce the affect of a spike.

The spike arrestors that RACQ use are crap and in affect will unlikely help if there is a spike.

What happened to the good old days of getting out and pushing the car and quickly jumping back in and clutch starting the car haha ( thats if your battery isnt completly flat)

need abit of effort to push a skyline and goodluck if its up hill!

Had to do this once while i was with the gf....i pushed and she clutch started it. Had a good laugh

What happened to the good old days of getting out and pushing the car and quickly jumping back in and clutch starting the car haha ( thats if your battery isnt completly flat)

need abit of effort to push a skyline and goodluck if its up hill!

Had to do this once while i was with the gf....i pushed and she clutch started it. Had a good laugh

did this yesterday with my skyline, still works fine :P

...Also dont understand the whole grounding the negative as opposed to puting it on the neg terminal - do people realise the car ground goes to the neg terminal on battery? :rofl:

I think the only reason this is ever done is to take one connection away from the hydrogen creating battery... (ie. When you disconnect the negative that's on the frame or engine hoist hook first as you're meant to, the spark that is created is a fair distance away from the battery.)

This way, if there was enough hydrogen around the battery to ignite, there's less chance of setting it off.

Not really a problem on R33s, although make sure you jump start under the bonnet of an R33 - the enclosed boot around the battery bay would definately increase the likelyhood of hydrogen being around in there!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...