Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here is a short Tutorial How to replace the Engine Mounts by lowering the front axle Member.

After 20-30 years it is always a good Idea to replace them , even if you vibrations or a buzzing noise.

Also Replace the Mounting of the Gearbox and the Proppelershaft!

I couldn`t find anything about this so here I explain how I have done it.

First you have to jack the car and fix the Engine from moving around, this is important cause you get int trouble later when the scrwholes not aligne .

20220921_143433.thumb.jpg.30b35f7a3a0e68dafdb86a7ffa995d83.jpg20220921_143429.thumb.jpg.00e65efa9e53fab6fe78fa88f73ba31b.jpg

 

Then you hang the engine at the Engine Bay. I have a special Bracket but a Tube and a Strapband will work also. I made myself a link which is screwd at the Engineblock

20220921_143410.thumb.jpg.781f78ece14ae8887fb3e8b44107bf72.jpg20220921_143414.thumb.jpg.ef87e7900a23306725b5f949bd410ebc.jpg

 

After everything is prepared you can start to remove all the nuts.

Start with the 4 nuts of the Powersteering and the clamps of the oil lines. There is a clamp on the left side over the cv shaft which is a little bit hidden the otherers are easy to locate.

Double check everything is slack, you don't want to bend the lines!

The next step is the trickiest part.

Loose the nuts of the Engine Mounts, 3 of them are easy to reach but the one under Turbo is hard to loose cause there is not much room.

After I tried all my 14mm wrenches, and I have a lot, i figured out this solution.

 

IMG-20220921-WA0006.thumb.jpeg.afffb708a0941bf9d4849e692ff27cb2.jpeg

This a 14mm Gearwrench ratchet with a  extendeble double Tube.

The wrench has to be flat without an angle and it should be really long cause the nut is really thight.

With this tool you can get there from the gearbox side and you should be able to remove it.

Before you loose the Axle Member check the aligne holes between the bolts!

Do they match? Take a photo. Mine had a little offset

.20220921_143424.thumb.jpg.db268301fb589cd9c8f98d6085c46574.jpg20220921_143451.thumb.jpg.4b164b54212e15cabb97a5f2ee41cff3.jpg

 

Loose the Nuts to the end of the Bolt, do NOT remove them completly.

Then carefuly lower the jack , stop and check if everything is loose and the member ore the line are not bend or stuck.

Remove the nuts on the right side and lower the Jack until you can get the Rubbermount out.

Replace it with the new one , lift the jack , insert the nuts. Do NOT thight them .

Same on the other side.

20220921_145024.thumb.jpg.e3554f744db0f2a909aa4fc9b230878c.jpgIMG-20220921-WA0004.thumb.jpeg.b73b58ec869482159221910c7ec94457.jpeg

Compared to the new the olds are 2mm lower and on the Turbo side they hafe some cracks.

Tighten the Nuts of the Axlemember , then the Steeringrack and the Oillines.

Here are the Tightingtorque specs. Tighten the Steeringrack the right way! First the upper Bolts then the lower ones .

20220922_115522.thumb.jpg.d5a050c69cee2fe274e842c3fb9c473a.jpg20220922_115636.thumb.jpg.6fad0270b4c8b69917f8b28c0dd38bac.jpg20220922_115902.thumb.jpg.543dd5689787bb3406642718eb4e7a77.jpg20220922_115955.thumb.jpg.fc3f8daf5923d3d0e16c77bb9d4d71f8.jpg

This are the required Tools

20220922_115245.thumb.jpg.402e69a2109ca9597c15c3bd8cb860d4.jpg

 

Took me 5 hours total including making the hook and wrench extension, all this is not too complicated, but it's better if you've done similar things before.

 

Possible this is helpfull to someone.

 

  • Like 6

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...