Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just a question for the ill informed

what is the difference between awkw and rwkw?

obviously the rwkw calculation is at the two rear wheels but awkw if at all 4 wheels so is the calcualtion different.

I must admit i am very interested to find out about this.

is anyone can fill me in i would muchly appreciate it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/
Share on other sites

just a question for the ill informed

what is the difference between awkw and rwkw?

obviously the rwkw calculation is at the two rear wheels but awkw if at all 4 wheels so is the calcualtion different.

I must admit i am very interested to find out about this.

is anyone can fill me in i would muchly appreciate it

When you put a car on a chassis dyno (roller or hub style) there are power losses, in the gearbox, the tailshaft universals, the diff, the driveshaft universals, the wheel bearings, the tyres and the rollers themselves. In a 2wd Skyline (like na R33 GTST) this works out around 50-60 kw, based on the cars we have tested. A couple of which we have also run up on the engine dyno confirm this.

Obviously when you add a transfer case, front diff, front drive shaft universals, front tyres and the extra rollers you loose more power. Around 20-25 kw based on what we see with GTR's.

So if you have a 280 kw engine, it will show around 220 rwkw and 200 awkw.

I should point out that there are no "losses", Newtons law applies, "energy can neither be gained nor lost". So the 60 kw is not "lost" it is transformed into other types of energy, in the car's case that's generally heat.

Hope that is of some help :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006141
Share on other sites

yeah that makes sense

so basically like when your talking about a rwd drive car and you can make an estimate of rwkw by working out an aprroximate powerloss percentage thru the drive train the same applies in the awd but there is more areas for power loss

btw whats the stock kw at the engine for a 34 model stagea series one and whats the awkw stock as well if you know

:D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006207
Share on other sites

so basically worst case your going to allow for about 80-90 kw loss on a stagea?

just trying to figure out what i will need to spend to get to my power figure i would like

finally convinced the missus to get an import and the stagea looks like the most logical car for us plus having the awd and turbo is a huge bonus

thanks for the quick replys guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006229
Share on other sites

whats the stock kw at the engine for a 34 model stagea series one and whats the awkw stock as well if you know :D

That's a good question mcnamg. I have seen 185 kw and 173 kw quoted for Stageas. I am going to run ours up on the 4wd dyno next week, while it is standard. I expect to see around 100 awkw. I will then drop the exhaust from the front of the cat and do a quick (and noisy) run to see what's in the exhaust upgrade. If I have time I will stick the Pipercros panel filter in and see what difference it makes at standard power, not much I expect.

I'll post it up when done. :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006230
Share on other sites

In a 2wd Skyline (like na R33 GTST) this works out around 50-60 kw, based on the cars we have tested.  

Just interested with your test data, was it tested using stock clutch or aftermarket clutch? and was it auto or manual? Cos my auto when it was 100% stock was suppose to have 184kw and it made 138rwkw on dyno, so I'd imagine manual example should made well above 140rwkw with a good stock clutch.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006546
Share on other sites

So if you have a 280 kw engine, it will show around 220 rwkw and 200 awkw.

SK, I dont know how you find the time to contribute so much to this forum!

Thank the great spartan air god you do!

My question is,

if my AUTOMATIC GTS4 made 170 RWKW (AWD fuses Pulled) on the dyno and ran 14.1@98Mph(0-60/2.6) at the drags, what sort of AWD KW do I need to make to get into the high 12's??

And, what would the difference in times be between AWD and RWD(fuses pulled) if I did manage to make 250 AWKW? (My long term goal for my Stock bottom end RB20)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006584
Share on other sites

Thanks heaps for all the information would be very interested to see what your cars power figures are like when you dyno it

when you post it up post the dyno sheet if u got it

can you also tell us what zorst u are using as well just to give us an idea of whats power it is capable of adding to the car

:P

you seem to be an absolute hive for information. I suppose its good that someone knows this information because if not we would still be trying to translate one of a million japanese car sites to english to figure it out

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006678
Share on other sites

Just interested with your test data, was it tested using stock clutch or aftermarket clutch? and was it auto or manual? Cos my auto when it was 100% stock was suppose to have 184kw and it made 138rwkw on dyno, so I'd imagine manual example should made well above 140rwkw with a good stock clutch.

Hi rs73, clutch is irrelevant, as long as it isn't slippimg of course. Auto's seem to loose around 10 kw more than manuals, if the torque converter locks up solidly maybe a few less. And lastly, all dyno's are different and climatic conditions make a difference (not withstanding DynoDynamics good attempt with Shoot Out Mode). So your 184 - 138 = 46 kw is well within tolerances.

Data source, we have run 2 X RB26DETT's on the engine dyno and then put them in the GTR and one RB30DET and put it in the GTST. Along with untold Holden and Chevy V8's (both big and small block). Plus over 30 Skylines (standard and modified) on the chassis dyno only. So I am pretty confident the data base is large and the results consistent enough to make a judgement.

Hope that helps :mad:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1007098
Share on other sites

SK, I dont know how you find the time to contribute so much to this forum!

I only sleep 4 to 5 hours a night, take a look at some of the times I post at.

if my AUTOMATIC GTS4 made 170 RWKW (AWD fuses Pulled) on the dyno and ran 14.1@98Mph(0-60/2.6) at the drags, what sort of AWD KW do I need to make to get into the high 12's??

That's a tough call, average power makes more difference than the sinlge max power number and RB20's get narrow in their power band as you move up the max power ladder. I would think 200 rwkw would do it, but it might need 210 rwkw if the auto isn't transferring the power well.

And, what would the difference in times be between AWD and RWD(fuses pulled)  if I did manage to make 250 AWKW? (My long term goal for my Stock bottom end RB20)

My experience (and I am not a drag racer) is the traction from 4wd makes more difference than the power losses by a good factor. Your target of 250 awkw is getting up there for an RB20. That's ~410 bhp, I have only ever seen 1 X RB20 make more than that and it didn't have standard internals. Ours makes 225 rwkw with good average power, it is tricky to get off the line and you really need to be paying attention to keep it firmly in the power band. The auto and 4wd will assist you there.

Hope that is of some help :mad:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1007099
Share on other sites

I only sleep 4 to 5 hours a night, take a look at some of the times I post at. I would think 200 rwkw would do it, but it might need 210 rwkw if the auto isn't transferring the power well.

My experience (and I am not a drag racer) is the traction from 4wd makes more difference than the power losses by a good factor.  Your target of 250 awkw is getting up there for an RB20.  That's ~410 bhp, I have only ever seen 1 X RB20 make more than that and it didn't have standard internals.  Ours makes 225 rwkw with good average power, it is tricky to get off the line and you really need to be paying attention to keep it firmly in the power band.  The auto and 4wd will assist you there. Hope that is of some help :D

Thanks, SK :)

If I can make 12's with only 210AWkW I will gladly reduce my expectations and COST ;)

Its easy to throw numbers around and 250 didnt sound too much to expect from reading ZOOM etc. on their experience with RB20's.

The Auto has been completely rebuilt with kevlar clutches , 2800RPM Stall etc so should do the job and handle any power the RB20 can throw at it.

AS my GTS4 is reg as a GTR I probably should put an RB26 in it and have an Auto GTR! :throwup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1010488
Share on other sites

attachment.php?attachmentid=22183&stc=1&thumb=1

Yuko, look at the A/F ratios at 60 kph, no wonder ours guzzles the gas. :headspin:

with the mods i got mine clocked 195awhp (145.411awkw) at 10psi.

What mods are there, sorry I know you mentioned it in another thread but I forgot....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1011002
Share on other sites

attachment.php?attachmentid=22183&stc=1&thumb=1  

Yuko, look at the A/F ratios at 60 kph, no wonder ours guzzles the gas. :headspin:  

 

What mods are there, sorry I know you mentioned it in another thread but I forgot....

Well according to his profile he's got a FMIC and a 3" exhaust... looking at the AFR doesn't look like he's got anything to correct the fuel, and it looks like it would really benefit from it :cheers: Add a bit of boost and it should make a fair bit more power again...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1011088
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...