Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi just wondering what boost people are running on their RB25 Stock engines?

I'd like to know what psi the Rb25 is capable of on with stock Headgasket & pistons,

and also what Psi people are running if they are using aftermarket Headgaskets & or Pistons on their rb25.

I'd like to know how much power a GTST can really make.

I'm currently running 12psi giving me 230 rwkw, down the track I'll up it to 18 psi. A guy i know runs 20 psi on his gtst running stock interals & makes 430 rwhp. I'm pretty sure he has stock headgasket, anyways some feed back would be great.

Cheers!

With replys, please keep them simple, no massive details about your car, just Boost related info on the rb25.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/53181-what-boost-do-you-run-on-your-rb25/
Share on other sites

I've run 1.2 bar a few times, but only for very very very short squirts, maybe a min at a time if that. I usualy dont boost past 12psi and run it day to day on 8psi with me turbo smart dual stage boost controller. turbo is a gcg stage 2 upgraded stock unit, not sure how much rwkw i have, need a tune. I also have a neo6 in my r33 if that'd make any difference.

Cheers :P

Why do people get dual stage boost controllers??? why not just leave it at 1 boost setting and drive softer and easier to save fuel with just a bleed valve? Also if you tuned your car to lets say 12psi with the dual stage controller and later turned it up to 16psi (high boost), wouldn't your car run lean as the air/fuel mixtures would be out?

boost has little to do with it.

Its more a question of how much air your turbo is flowing.

Some turbos flow more than others at say... 15psi.

So trying to compare by way of PSI wont work.

Basically, if your not pinging, have upgraded injectors etc etc.

Then there is no problem in basic. But how long the motor would last say making 270-300rwkw on stock everything with track beatings. Who knows.

again, thats unrelated to boost

Why do people get dual stage boost controllers??? why not just leave it at 1 boost setting and drive softer and easier to save fuel with just a bleed valve? Also if you tuned your car to lets say 12psi with the dual stage controller and later turned it up to 16psi (high boost), wouldn't your car run lean as the air/fuel mixtures would be out?

A) the car came with a boost controller allready in it B) ever tried to drive with say 12 psi or above in the wet? its not to practical for day to day driving with a stupid amount of boost, its uncomfortable and chews through the petrol C) after market computers adjust the ratio's so it doesn't ' lean ' out, how do you think every other boost controller works in the world?

Yeh I know that bout Psi, just wondering what psi people are running anyway... From now on when you post your Psi, post your turbo too! :P

even then, there are like 20-30-40 differnt combos of some garrett descriptions as you can change wheels and all sorts of things.

again, if u just wanna know PSI, then no worries, but PSI wont have a lot to do with blowing a stock motor. Much bigger factors involved there so if you wanna know "how much an RB25 can make" and i assume u mean a stock one, then you aint gonna find a good answer.

and 16psi through a stock turbo. Oh dead.

hope you have some spare $$, cause its gonna be dying very soon.

Much over 10-~12psi the stock turbo is doing stuff all anyhow so its no use taking it any further.

B) ever tried to drive with say 12 psi or above in the wet? its not to practical for day to day driving with a stupid amount of boost, its uncomfortable and chews through the petrol

if you got a controlled right foot its very practical.

i'll drive mine day-to-day @ 16psi ~ 270rwkw and no dramas from my setup.

its about sensibility and being controlled, more so than practical.

On a stock R33 GTST-- you can run on 14 PSI max...dont push it..unless you're ready to replace your turbo... push it more and you're looking at replacing your engine.

Run your stock gtst on up to 12psi tops and leave it to 7psi for every day driving.. this way you will give your turbo and your engine a longer life.

i know someone who pushed his R33 to 23 PSI..he has big turbo..and yet he managed to blow his heads,crack all pistons..ended up geting a new engine which cost him 7k..stupid really.

if you got a controlled right foot its very practical.

i'll drive mine day-to-day @ 16psi ~ 270rwkw and no dramas from my setup.

its about sensibility and being controlled, more so than practical.

My car spins no matter how lightly i drive in the wet, its the tune of the car, i'm a conservative driver talking from the way my car behaves, maybe it has something to do with the suspension settings or shitty tyre's or how hard the turbo comes on, but all i know is it spins, and thats why a boost controller is a good thing.

Yeh good point R31Nismoid. I run a VL t3/t4 High Flowed on my rb25 @ 12 psi, The turbo is great, my dyno tuners were very impressed with it making such efficient power, they asked me where i got it from but unfortunately, i dont even know, came with the car.

As the guys have already posted , boost is irelevant. I have a T66 that makes 400 rwkw at 1.4 bar (upgraded internals) and a GCG ball bearing hi flow that makes 265 rwkw at 1.3 bar (standard internals). There is no way the standard internals would handle 1.3 bar from the T66. I work to the ther rule of thumb limit for standard internals on an RB25DET as being ~450bhp. Whether you use 1.1 bar or 1.6 bar to get there is not the issue.:P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity.
    • 100% the factory sender is tapered, that is how it seals (well, that and teflon paste or tape)
    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
×
×
  • Create New...