Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, just a very quick one, on my R33 i have a 3" turbo back xhaust, mines computer chip, apexi super intake, hks ssq bov and one or 2 other minor mods.

i have just bought a greddy phneumatic boost controller (good unit should only spike max of 2pound) and i will hopefully fit it in the next fortnight.

however i may not put it on as im slightly concerned that im not running an FMIC, i want to run 12 pound but i fear i may harm the car if i dont have an intercooler.

do you think it will be ok to run that boost without it? if its going to hurt the engine i'll turn it down to stock psi during the day or when its hot and just run higher boost at night. and i obvioulsy wont be running any higher than 12 as its still the stock turbo.

so in short can i run 12psi without an FMIC relatively safely?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55101-12pound-without-fmic/
Share on other sites

well for a start, you DO have an intercooler...

the first issue is that at 12psi there is a flow restriction in the stock intercooler. so if you use the stock intercooler and your boost gauge reads 12psi then in actual fact you are probably making around 14psi with 2psi being lost across the stock cooler. with a FMIC there is usually negligable pressure loss and 12psi at the boost gauge probably also means 12psi from teh turbo outlet.

the second issue is that upping the boost on an intercooler of relatively small surface area will result in minimal cooling of the compressed air and consequently higher intake temps. this may lead to detonation.

so... my advide would be to run 10psi on the stocker and wait for a FMIC before you up it any higher.

but others will probably tell you otherwise so follow your instincts.

cheers,

Waz.

i c, well 10psi will still make a huge difference im told from stock, im just over being beaten by ss commies cause i only have stock boost, and after 8months of not running higher than (is 5pound stock?) its starting to sh*t me.

its not likely i'll be getting an FMIC as, all my money will be going into my house, otherwise i would have bought an EBC to start with. but 10pound is still enough to make a big diff so it wont be to dissapointing.

10psi will definetly make a difference, if you run higher ie around 12 or 14 you will find a even more of an improvement but not as drastic because the stock IC is too restrictive.

The stock cooler also heats up too much faster with so if you run high boost and are not moving fast or its a hot day u will lose power after a while (not heaps but noticeable)

U wont harm the engine, more likely to kill the turbo so dont worry about the engine..

i ran upto 1 bar for about 7 months with stock cooler and catback (had a air leak didnt realise)

the car lost a alot of performance when i put it back to stock boost :)

and yes about 7 is stock boost but with turbo back exhaust it would be probably around 8psi.

stock is around 5 or so pound at low revs but when you hit higher revs (around 4500 i think) boost will rise to around 7psi. if i were u i would leave it around 8psi, you should be able to take any commy with that. Save up for a computer and a cooler then you can happily run 12 all day long.

yeah this is true, the b/c only cost me $50 which is great as its a good unit, i never intended to run more boost, i had just planned on selling the car(money for the house), but now it seems as though i will need to keep it for work.

so somewhere down the track i may get an FMIC but for now i guess i'll just keep it around 9-10pound and dial it up to 12 if anything lines up next to me.

if i blow the turbo i'll get over it, just an excuse to buy a big one.

Mines stock as and its running in 7psi

Don't any higher than 9psi with the stock cooler (I personally go any higher than 7Psi, for safety sake),

Everything in the first reply is absoultly correct.

It is not worthe the risk, realibility issues, go spend $1149 on a hybrid intercooler kit, install it yourself, put boost up to 10Psi, and have fun, that should be a vast improvement over 5Psi. Plenty of people go over 10 Psi on stock turbine and computer but I dont thing it is a good idea, you will run into boost cut (by ECU) problems causing and catastrophic failure of the ceramic turbine. Dont go above 10Psi.

BTW: WTF is a "mines computer chip" I have not found anyone that replaces the R33 ECU chip, what am I missing?

i ran 10psi with stock cooler for ages....it is safe as houses....

next step is a fmic tho...then you can run 12psi easy....

FYI: stock cooler is so retrictive that you lose about 7psi apparently just going through it....so when your running 10psi at your engine you turbo is actually doing 17psi.....thats why so many ppl have their ceramic exhaust wheel fly out their exhaust pipe....

stock cooler: 10psi

fmic: 12-13psi

2ez....

ps. no use really running more than 10psi even with fmic unless you have some sort of management like a safc as it will run way to rich and you wont get any gain out of it.....prolly just keep blowing intercooler pipes... :)

I ran 13psi for at least 6 months with the stock intercooler. It worked for me, so 12psi should be ok. I just wouldnt be racing around a track all day with it. Bursts here and there is fine. Half a dozen continous dyno runs are not ok, heat builds up quickly, but with some nice cool air in Canberra, 12psi would be fine.

you'll see fark all gain running much more than 10-11psi through the stock turbo anyhow so just leave it around 10-11 and be done with it.

Any boost controller that spikes isnt a good unit at all :)

My good ole bleed valve dont spike at all. Get too 16psi and stay there, doesnt go over.

Andrew - I ran 12 psi on my stockie for about 12 months and it was fine, bit I do drive like a granny :) . But the thing I'd be worried about in your setup is the ECU.

Being a Mines ECU (and probably tuned in JP) then it'll be tuned for 100ron. So turning up the boost might get it to ping. Plus summer is on it's way and you know how hot it gets in Canberra :)

I'd keep it safe at 10psi for now.

J

ok well the general feeling here is that 10psi should be fine, but going over will, possibly screw with the turbo, not allow me to get any more power after 12psi anyway and make the car to hot.

so i think for now, it will set it at 10/11psi, and on the hotter days, wind it down to 9ish.

also, i have no idea what a mines chip is either, i was just told that the car had one when i bought it, i have no idea how to find out, i just had a quick look in the boot and the ecu looks stock, just a silver box. i'll take it out tomorrow b4 work and check it out, to see if theres anything different. but if theres a "chip" in there i wont be able to find out.

sounds like bs to me though, i never really trhought much of it till now.

Cool,

Oh, the ECU isn't in the boot :) It's under the passengers side kick panel - where their left foot sits.

Pull the plastic panel off and you'll see the ECU. It might have stamped on the cover that it's a Mines, or you might have to unscrew the cover and have a look at the chip etc...

Mines ECU's tend to run more timing advance than the stock ones, so this could make it a little prone to ping.

J

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...