Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi ppl,

i have read in many places a quick and easy way to raise boost pressure to close to 1 bar in a gtr is to remove the restrictor in the pressure line going to the factory boost-controll solonoid..

it is apparently marked by a yellow band..

but where exactly is it?? can any1 give me exact directions to finding what i'm looking for? (left right front back top bottom.. etc etc)

its a 32gtr.

thanks for the help..

thanks for the link, but i'm quite unfarmiliar with where the boost controll solonoid is or waht it looks like.. having never owned a turbo car at all b4.

i know what to look for.. being a black hose with a yellow band indicating where the restrictor is... but dont know where to look, there are lots of black hoses... :)

is it anywhere near the pressure hose that u tap into to run a boost guage off? does that hose lead to your BC solonoid? coz i can follow that hose but it dissapears behind the back of the engine.. ?

cheers

thanks for the link,  but i'm quite unfarmiliar with where the boost controll solonoid is or waht it looks like.. having never owned a turbo car at all b4.

i know what to look for..  being a black hose with a yellow band indicating where the restrictor is...  but dont know where to look, there are lots of black hoses...   :)

is it anywhere near the pressure hose that u tap into to run a boost guage off?  does that hose lead to your BC solonoid? coz i can follow that hose but it dissapears behind the back of the engine.. ?

cheers

You will find the stock boost solinoid on the drivers side mounted on the inner skirt near the strutt tower . It has 2 black hoses going to it and a power plug , one of the hoses ( they are about 8 mm thick o/d ) has 2 yellow lines near where it goes to the solinoid , the restrictor is inside that about 20 mm from the end .

A word of warning here if you remove the restrictor and you have bigger exhaust , dump pipes or other mods it may boost a lot more than 14 psi .

If you still have the stock ceramic turbos they may let go and you could destroy your engine . Even if you don't have ceramic turbos 1.2 bar is to much boost for the stock ecu to handle , it would lean out at top revs and may blow a piston .

hmm thanks for advice guys,

my boost guage shows the car is hitting about 8-10psi atm.. with no form of BC at all.. but it does have full zorst system and twin air pods...

so i migh just wait till i get a bc.. as i DEFINATELY dont wana blow anything up :)

thanks for the help.. much appreciated

hmm thanks for advice guys,

my boost guage shows the car is hitting about 8-10psi atm.. with no form of BC at all..  but it does have full zorst system and twin air pods...    

so  i migh just wait till i get a bc.. as i DEFINATELY dont wana blow anything up :)

thanks for the help.. much appreciated

If your boost gauge reading is right , take out the restrictor and take it for a run to see what the boost will go up to ( the higher the gear the better ) if not to high leave it out ( max 14 psi ) . I was warning you just in case you didn't have a boost gauge . Don't go on the stock boost gauge cause they are not accurate .

I can;t help you but i am also interested in this...........is this also applicable to GTSt's?

For R33 GTS-t? ............

Actually, a reduction in boost will occur. The brass restrictor is inside the the hose with the 'red band', before it splits off into the T piece, coming off your upper IC pipe, the one on its way to plenumn.

ie: you'll let too much pressure 'hit' the WG actuator, therefore letting boost go!!! (this is from my excercises in this field).

If anything, restrict this pipe even further,.... if anything. (still not as good as a bleeder though. Why don't you just drill a tiny hole in the WG pipe, and experiment with other size holes with spare tubing...it's fun.

Mines at a rock-solid 11 pissants, with just a hole in WG pipe, size established by trial and error. If you're not silly, no risk. If you are, I know where you can find a new turbo/motor.

GTR's are different!!! (I believe, .........I don't own GTR........yet) :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...