Jump to content
SAU Community

turbo question


fatz
 Share

Recommended Posts

Fatz - that turbo is one bigger than the 3040. It's a monster. And a laggy hoe, I'd reckon.

Jeez - I didn't realise the XR6 had such a big turbo - yum - I guess they are a 4 litre or whatever - so lag wouldn't be an major issue for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

700hpsidesml.jpg

Dual Ball Bearing GT35/GT40R Turbo assembly. T3 style inlet flange with 4 bolt T31 style exit. Large 60- 1 style compressor housing with 4.00 inlet and 2.50" outlet. Hi HP 4-6 Cyl applications. This turbo has a flow capacity of about 600HP.

Turbine

-Wheel: 68mm w/ 84 trim

-Housing: .82 ar, 1.06 ar

Compressor

-Wheel: 82mm w/ 56 trim

-Housing: .70 ar

gt35rturbine.gif

gt35rcompress.gif

http://www.atpturbo.com/Merchant2/merchant...tegory_Code=GRT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol yea its pretty laggy but changes are on the cars (cams)

hits like a krack whore at 3800

have a jun base map for a tdo6 than im going to lay into the comp and see how it goes

until the power fc arrives

gonads... suck my balls biatch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be careful with the tune - that turb will pump a whole lot of air thru and you need to give it fuel otherwise it will ping it's tits off an go bang.

As an example - I am still running the 2835 tune on my car - but with the 3040 on it. If I boost even 2 PSI, my air fuel raitio goes way way lean

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I'm gettin' a fat.

I think this will be the turbo for me. 3800rpm is roughly what I expected, on the 3ltr it should be around the 3500rpm mark. Thats where I want it.

What did you pay for the turbo? new or s/h?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Trail braking done right, should have the rear unsettled, such that you're actually turning the car by a noticeable amount WITH the brakes, and hence noticeably less steering input.
    • No you don't. Just no more driving in the wet, and clean your window manually before you drive
    • I'm not sure if they tick your boxes, but Haltech would be my pick. I'm an Adaptronic guy from way back, and Haltech acquired Adaptronic to basically get Andy, AND his IP on how he does things like fuel modelling etc.
    • Just on this, as there's a huge issue in your assumption Dose.   The logic you've given, is the same logic old school NA guys give for "needing back pressure" in an exhaust. If you free up an exhaust system, and keep injecting the same fuel in etc, at the same timing, you'll typically drop power. Freeing the exhaust will often make an engine want a little bit more timing, and even sometimes a little more fuel, but then it'll make even more power.   There's many mods people do and "get no extra power" when running a comparison on the same tune. Imagine a car tuned for 91, but now we say put 98 in it, see no difference. But as we now have 98 fuel, you can run more timing, and make more power, as the 91 was knock limited.   So just be very wary in your claim of "don't retune it and do a back to back and you'll see". The correct approach would be tune the car with stock manifold, swap the manifold to aftermarket, and retune it again. But no one wants to do that, and all the results we get are "this was stock, and this is manifold changed and tuned" and people put it all down as just the tune doing it.
    • Unplug ECU. Unplug TPS. Unplug boost pressure sensor. Now, all the wires, placing your ground (black) multimeter lead at the ECU end, measure resistance of the 5V line at the boost sensor plug. Then do the same to the TPS plug. Then do the same for all the other wires that relate to the TPS, or boost sensor.   All of your measurements should be very very low. You're looking to see if wiring is out of wack here.   Secondly, from memory on the R33 (not a neo motor, so I'm assuming an r34) the ground wire for the TPS and boost sensor are NOT equal to ground of the car/battery. IE, DO NOT connect ground of the sensor to the engine/body of car. You'll get a ground loop, and/or potentially screw shit up. In electronics, ground for a circuit, is not necessarily equal to ground of another circuit.   So this leads me to ask, when measuring your 5V, how are you getting 1.5V? Where are your multimeter leads touching for both the red and black lead on the multimeter?   If you're measuring power on the sensor wire, and putting ground on the car chassis or negative battery terminal, that could be all of your issues in "getting 1.5v". Electronics engineers can do some funky stuff with circuits, and when both sensors are on, it's enough laid to alter how the ECU is functioning.
×
×
  • Create New...