Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

(sorry guys about the spil. and grammer)

I am a new member in this grat forum, I am Moh'd from Kingdom of Bahrain, I own a 1989 NISSAN 200SX (Euro. ver) with CA18DET.

I want to swap my engine to RB20DET , I love the drag race so I need the car for streetrace and dragrace.

so

My car is S13 it is whight 1160kg (2777lb) with driver and with the CA18 engine and my goal is high 11's. so I do some cal. and found that I need to 400 HP (298 Kw) that mean with 15% for the tranny lose it will be = 340 whp (254 wKw) to get my goal 11's.

so my Quz is

can I do this number of HP in the RB20DET ? what I need to do it ? how many of you do this amout of HP in his RB20DET?

thanks guys for your help

(I will try to put some pic for my S13 soon)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60427-s13-rb20det-350whp-needed/
Share on other sites

I think its been said here before that RB S13's are no lighter than R32's and have cooling issues . If you can get one to replace the S13 , Nissan's done most of the work for you in a better handling and braking package .

I'd put my money into an R32 if it was me .

350rwhp and low 11s is a very easy task with an SR and not that much harder with the CA18 but the SR parts are easyer to get so I'd go SR power.

If you want 350rwhp and an RB a near stock RB26 would do your job for less than the cost of buying and building an RB20.Shop around for prices and work out whats the go for you.

if I can do a 350whp in SR so that mean I can do it in RB20 coz as I know that the RB20 and SR20 have same HP and displacment

I can't go with RB26DETT coz it is so expensive and there is not alot of spare parts or aftermarket parts for it here in Bahrain

here in Bahrain I can get a RB20DET for very good price and better price than the SR20DET and I can found a racing parts for the RB20DET easy than the SR20 and with better price.

so can I get 350WHP with out open the engine ( I mean no cams, no piston, no con. rod)

How many HP can the stock RB20 injector support ?

thanks

the SR is more expensive to buy, but in long run a RB might be more expensive.

the engine is going to do some internal mod for durability.

Then u are talking 4 of everything VS 6 of them!

BTW SR is lighter and has more torque then RB20 which makes it a better engine for street and handling.

If u REALLY want a RB20, try here

OK, let's start with some common terminology;

rwhp = rear wheel horsepower (using a roller style dyno)

rwkw = rear wheel killowatts (using a roller style dyno)

bhp = brake horsepower (at the engine)

kw = killowatts (at the engine)

rhhp = rear hub horsepower (using a dyno that attaches to the rear hubs)

4whp = four wheel horsepower (using a roller style dyno)

4hhp = four hub horsepower (using a dyno that attaches to the 4 hubs)

It has been my experience that Skylines don't loose a fixed percentage between the engine and the rollers. Whether the car has 200 rwkw or 500 rwkw, the losses end up between 55 kw (small gearbox, diff etc) and 75 kw (large gearbox, diff etc). GTR's and Stageas loose around 15 kw more due to 4wd.

So if you want 350 rwhp (260 rwkw) you will need ~430 bhp (320 kw). I have never seen an RB20 with standard cams make anywhere near that. Ours makes 225 rwkw (360 bhp) with GTR cams, adj camshaft pulleys, split dump, ball bearing hi flow RB25 turbo, POD filter, heat shield, ambient air feed, Power FC with Boost Control Kit, split dump/engine pipe combo, no cat, 3.25" exhaust.

The standard injectors are 270 cc, so good for around 270 bhp, again no where near enough.

Moving onto internals, to make over 400 bhp I have found forged internals (pistons and rods) are necessary as you have to increase the rpm to get a decent (wide) power band. Otherwise a close ratio gearbox will be necessary.

So I suggest you add up all the costs and then make a decision, most people here find once your RB20 target exceeds 240 rwkw it is far cheaper to go RB25 or RB26 or RB30. As Steve-SST suggested, the RB26 is somewhat more attractive.

As Maxx suggested, take a look at the RB20 power comparison thread, it has most of the info you need. http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...&highlight=RB20

Hope that is of some help:cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...