Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey,

I recently pick myself up a I/C, now im getting around to do the piping sometime this week. now after reading how good the gtr plenum is and seeing one on a neo rb25, i was wondering does anyone know anyone in australia (or perth) that would be able to make up an adoptor plate to suit an r33 rb25?

thanks michael

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60869-gtr-plenum/
Share on other sites

hey,

I recently pick myself up a I/C, now im getting around to do the piping sometime this week. now after reading how good the gtr plenum is and seeing one on a neo rb25, i was wondering does anyone know anyone in australia (or perth) that would be able to make up an adoptor plate to suit an r33 rb25?

thanks michael

Interesting. Was this a standard GTR plenum on the NEO or an aftermarket one (i.e Greddy). Anyone know how hard these would be to fit and whether it would be worth the effort, I mean, outside of making intercooler piping easier. The throttle cable would have to be adapted to suit, but anything else??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60869-gtr-plenum/#findComment-1152756
Share on other sites

Brett, the gtr plenum was on an r34 gt-t 4dr (if u watch d1, it is the blitz r34 4dr, driven by Ken Nomura)

i just did abit of seraching and found that a plate or spacer would be needed to be made to fit inbetween the plenum and the rb25 head. i have contact someone in perth which does ic piping and ask him if he could possable do it, i will get back to you once i have got my reply.

also i read that the gtr fuel rail, will fit also pefrectly?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60869-gtr-plenum/#findComment-1152768
Share on other sites

Anyone know how hard these would be to fit and whether it would be worth the effort

I fealt top end increased but you lose power down low, all in all if I owned another Skyline would I do it again.........No.......

As mentioned run a search on past threads, here is 2, mainly about 32's but 33's are bought up...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=49852

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=36518

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60869-gtr-plenum/#findComment-1152784
Share on other sites

Brett, it was a stock gtr plenum, i have been told and read many times that the responds that the gtr plenum is second to none

on an RB26, YES with the multiple throttle bodies.

on an RB25, NO...........

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60869-gtr-plenum/#findComment-1152799
Share on other sites

then Sydneykid, why is it uses on the blitz r34 drift car? and what is the problem putting it on a rb25?

i really would like to know, as i have the chance to buy the plenum very soon and if it isnt going to work well on the rb25 there is no point me getting it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60869-gtr-plenum/#findComment-1152805
Share on other sites

then Sydneykid, why is it uses on the blitz r34 drift car? and what is the problem putting it on a rb25?  

i really would like to know, as i have the chance to buy the plenum very soon and if it isnt going to work well on the rb25 there is no point me getting it

Maybe it has an RB26 in it. Or an RB26 cylinder head. Or maybe it was done so they could get the extra throttle response from the multiple throttle bodies. Drifters need throttle response much more than they need excessive power, particularly long wheelbase heavy sedans. One thing is for sure, there is far more to it than just the plenum.:cheers:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60869-gtr-plenum/#findComment-1152817
Share on other sites

so SK, if i was to do it on my fairly stock rb25? the gains would be almost zero? if i dont lose any power, responds i will still do it as i want the piping shorter

Why not go for an aftermarket plenum made for the RB25?? At least then you know some R&D has gone into its design to make sure it works.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60869-gtr-plenum/#findComment-1152843
Share on other sites

so SK, if i was to do it on my fairly stock rb25? the gains would be almost zero? if i dont loser any power, responds i will still do it as i want the piping shorter

Forget about GAINS, you are looking at LOSSES. Have a read.....

Some info on the RB20 with RB26 inlet as per Zoom Magazine edition 64 and edition 62;

RB20withRB26Inlet.jpg

This picture shows the RB26 plenum being test fitted up to the cut and welded RB20 inlet. The throttle bodies go between the RB26 plenum and the modified (shortened) RB20 inlet but are not shown in this photo.

RB20inletwithRB26Plenum.jpg

This is a picture of the RB26 plenum, RB26 throttle bodies and RB20 shortened inlet on the RB20.

RB20withRB26InletonEngine.jpg

Using a 120 degree bend at the throttle body reduces the difference in intercooler pipework by more than 50%, to a bit less than 1 litre using 75 mm pipework.

NN120DegreeFront.jpg

NN120DegreeSide.jpg

To work out the throttle response difference the calculations are easy;

2500 cc X 5000 rpm / 2 (4 stroke) at 1.3 bar = 135 litres per second

So a saving of 1 litre represents less than 0.005 of a second

That's not a lot of lag to save with reduced pipework.

So using an RB26 plenum and throttle bodies on anything other than an RB26 is not a good idea in my opinion. Especially when you consider the potential to loose throttle response due to poor airflow distribution is far greater than any minute shortening of the inlet pipework.

My 20 cents worth:cheers:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/60869-gtr-plenum/#findComment-1152871
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oof. One of my mates has an R34 GT-R that he initially was a "I want to go twins for response and convenience" on his stock 2.6 with Kelford 272 cams, but his friends are pests and were always in his ear about their place being in the bin.   Eventually one of the 2860-5s decided to add it's own input and force his hand, so he conceded and went for a Pulsar 6262G ("G35 900") with T4 0.85 hotside.    Here's an overlay of the results, same cams, same stock bottom end, same boost, same fuel, just from a pretty tidy 2860-5 install to a Pulsar turbo on a 6boost maniifold on BP98.   Worth mentioning here, it may seem like a dead horse thing but the dyno plot doesn't tell the story of how much better it is to drive - transient response has completely changed the car, he used to have flat foot shifting to stop it having to wind up again on gear changes even at >7000rpm... now it builds boost faster than that even short shifting.   It's 100% transformed the car before you even consider how much better it holds on: Pulsar and Garrett aren't the same, but from our experience if you're just looking for a better drive and the ability to make the same or more power I think the divided G30 770 would probably be the smallest I'd go to.
    • Great work Duncan, any events local you will give it a test once all done? 
    • Sweet, yeah hoping stock gears will hold up. May use the transbrake feature on hill climb starts so that will test it.
    • Yeah, the thread is only nearly 20 years old.
    • Been down in Tassie for 2 weeks (a cruise, not a race for once) but spent a little time on her when I got back. I worked out the injector settings in the PowerFC were not correct for nismo 555s, set those to 66% +10ms and added a little air at closed throttle, set the timing (approximately, because it has some weird non 15o cells around idle) and now she starts and idles properly. She purrs like a kitten (ignore the co2 alarm in the background, I did  ) 20250518_171052.mp4 Next step, off for run-in, tuning and alignment!
×
×
  • Create New...