Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

BP Ultimate for the Skyline, the Corolla, the bikes, the mower and the weed whacker...

Hell yeah! I put some Ultimate in the 25yo mower the other day, it runs sooo much smoother now. BTW Im not joking! My arms werent sore from mowing because no more stupid vibration! It was tops!

http://www.mrtrally.com.au/forums/topic.as...?TOPIC_ID=20187 i found this when i tried to look up the differences between bp ultimate and shell optimax. i dont think any1 has done a proper test on the fuels side by side bcoz i cant find any conclusive evidence on the two. only ppls opinions.

I think it was ABUSE, I think hes on here. He used to do work for both petrol companies for a bit (still might) and he said optimax is just a normal fuel with a detergent and a octane boost added in to the fuel mix. Ultimate really is a better fuel, burns better etc, its the fuel that is the higher octane, its not from additives.

I just cant remember where he posted it tho.

I think it was ABUSE, I think hes on here.  He used to do work for both petrol companies for a bit (still might) and he said optimax is just a normal fuel with a detergent and a octane boost added in to the fuel mix.  Ultimate really is a better fuel, burns better etc, its the fuel that is the higher octane, its not from additives.

I just cant remember where he posted it tho.

Not true. Quoted from the shell website:

How is the Octane Rating boosted?

 

The octane rating of Optimax is higher than standard Premium Unleaded petrol due to the fuel being blended from special high octane components produced by the refinery. Optimax is produced only at Shell refineries utilising high octane components.

 

The high octane is due to the blended fuel and not the use of octane boosting fuel additives.

I'm sure the reason why I started using Optimax was after a Choice, A Current Affair, or Today Tonight report tested the top fuels from leading suppliers to see which one was cleaner, more efficient, and richer, and Optimax came out on top... but my memory isn't what it used to be (too much computer radiation!).

Not true. Quoted from the shell website:

Not trying to sound offencive but read between the lines...

BLENDED fuel means mixed with something. IE an octane booster, or something similar like a much higher rated fuel, etc something along those lines. As whoever it was that orginally posted what they did, he might have just put it in to laymans terms for the rest of us to understand.

BP Ultimate is still the better fuel, as I think you will find its not 'blended' with anything.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...