Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

SK, Why do you prefer a Power FC for a manual? Is it because then you have control over the ignition maps, whereas you don't with SAFC/DFA?

The Power FC gives me control over everything, so as well as the ignition maps (that you mentioned) there is no speed limiter, I can move the rev limit, adjust idle speeds, cold start and run, temp compensation, boost maps, adjust the dash warning levels etc etc.

The benefit with a piggyback/interceptor solution is that then little 'features' present in the stock ECU (such as raising the RPM when Air Con is on, cold start fuel adjustments, etc) are retained. At least that's the case with Silvias etc (SR20). This is one of the arguments to go for Dr Drift tuning. Also, given the ECU hasn't been changed, ADR laws aren't broken, however they prolly are with an SAFC/DFA anyway :D

Power FC's have all of those same as standard ECU does and they are all programmed, it's one of their big advantages. The car drives as nice, in all conditions, as it did with the standard computer. So I would never bother with an SAFC on a manual. The DFA is so cheap, it is attractive though for people on a tight budget.

Since I have only leaned out the A/F ratios with the DFA, I have no doubt it would surpass the EPA tests results that a standard one would achieve. I have not richened any load points at this stage as it simply didn't need it. Maybe after the turbo, intercooler and exhaust upgrades it might.

:(

Sydneykid,

With my setup, i didn't even think of using the standard restrictor - i bought a brass T-piece and soldered. At the moment it's venting to atmosphere, and I plugged the old vacuum hose up with a screw for now. I was thinking of venting back to the turbo - is it really going to make a difference to anything?

As for my maps, do you mean the settings for each value? I haven't been on a dyno at all, so i have no power maps or anything like that.

Even though there are up tp 64 programmable points, I found that I only managed to register 30 something, then it would go blank for a bit. I'll go out to the car and write out all the values a bit later and put them up here. It's only a preliminary setting, as I haven't been out for extensive drives to fine tune, but the are staying pretty damn stable at the boost settings (about 7 for low and 10 for high map).

Also, I don't really know much about ignition timing and tuning, so it's all on the todo list. I'll try and so some research and find if there are other options that might overcome timing issues.

Actually, are there any books that anyone recommend especially for tuning/engine management/efi etc?

Sydneykid,

With my setup, i didn't even think of using the standard restrictor - i bought a brass T-piece and soldered. At the moment it's venting to atmosphere, and I plugged the old vacuum hose up with a screw for now. I was thinking of venting back to the turbo - is it really going to make a difference to anything?

As for my maps, do you mean the settings for each value? I haven't been on a dyno at all, so i have no power maps or anything like that.

Even though there are up tp 64 programmable points, I found that I only managed to register 30 something, then it would go blank for a bit.  I'll go out to the car and write out all the values a bit later and put them up here. It's only a preliminary setting, as I haven't been out for extensive drives to fine tune, but the are staying pretty damn stable at the boost settings (about 7 for low and 10 for high map).

Also, I don't really know much about ignition timing and tuning, so it's all on the todo list. I'll try and so some research and find if there are other options that might overcome timing issues.

Actually, are there any books that anyone recommend especially for tuning/engine management/efi etc?

The Stagea had a brass T piece standard, so I used that. I plumbed the vent back into the inlet, it goes via a fitting on the BOV return pipe. That way I have nothing open to atmosphere. didn't havre to block anything off. The main reason I did it was so that all of the air that went in via the AFM stays in. It was already running rich, so no sense it letting even a small amount of air escape.

By maps I mean the solenoid openings you have chosen at the various load points to maintain the boost levels that you have selected. They won't transfer to mine as you have a different size vent. But it would be interesting to compare nonetheless.

I have all of the load points available, you may have to adjust the trim (as per the instructions) to fine tune the input from the injector pulse signal.

:)

Ah, yes, i think I'll go plumb that spare vent back into that spare hose. kinda makes sense to not lose even a small amount of air. The R33 has a brass T piece stock as well, but i had already bought another one, so i just used it anyway.

I was doing a bit of adjusting to the maps on the way home last night, but I'll have more of a play today and hopefully have something solid to write up.

Actually, in the instructions i remember reading that you have to have the hand controller plugged in before it fires up, or you get a blank screen with a row of black squares on the top line... well it does, but last night it was also going like that by itself when it's already plugged and screwed in. Sometimes it would come back to normal after a while too! Have you found that same thing at all? I didn't know if i had a dodgy connection somewhere, so i pulled the hand controller apart and resoldered a couple of suspect joints.

I had forgotten about the trimming for the injector pulse signal. I'll reread that section before i head out today.

Thanks for all that info on the power FC too by the way.

cheers!

Actually, in the instructions i remember reading that you have to have the hand controller plugged in before it fires up, or you get a blank screen with a row of black squares on the top line... well it does, but last night it was also going like that by itself when it's already plugged and screwed in. Sometimes it would come back to normal after a while too! Have you found that same thing at all? I didn't know if i had a dodgy connection somewhere, so i pulled the hand controller apart and resoldered a couple of suspect joints.

Yep, I have to have the Controller plugged in before I turn the ignition on. Which is a bugger actually because I have the DFA as well and I like to swap over to check/fine tune stuff. An example, coming down the freeway from Newcastle there are plenty of long uphill climbs to tune the load sensitive settings. (You can't do that very well on a flat road, as you get up to warp speed so easily.) I was sitting in the passengers side and I wanted to swap to the DFA to tune out a flattish spot. But we would have had to stop and turn the engine off, not a good idea on the freeway.

My Controller works perfectly, since I turned up the contrast I have not had one problem. Your issue sounds like a dry solder joint, most likely on the connector pins (either the Controller or the DFA inself). I would have a close look around there for any suspect joints.

:D

so would this fuel controller be anygood for a 1.6L 4 cyl laser, that i would like to supercharge? ill be using sliughtly larger injectors, so im assuming the fuel controller will allow me to tune it all properly?

steve

Hi Steve, I know nothing about Mazdas (well piston engined ones anyway). My only suggestion would be to get a mutimeter and check the AFM output voltages. If it has a steadily increasing (or decreasing) voltage with engine load then the DFA will work fine.:D

hi sydneykid and others

a while ago before i had my ebc and powerfc etc i tried what you did above, i originally had the ground wire hack done which gave me 7psi all the time, but instead i bypassed the solenoid completely (like you have above) and i was able to hit 1 bar with no problems. the engine sounded like a rocket and i could hear detonation (or a form of tapping) so i backed off, i tried it a few times and could repeat would hit the full +7 on the stocker guage. Unsure why yours is only going to 0.50 bar, or perhaps why mine would just goto 1 bar? Going to 0.50bar is the stocker wastegate actuator

correct? Does this make sense?

hi sydneykid and others

 

a while ago before i had my ebc and powerfc etc i tried what you did above, i originally had the ground wire hack done which gave me 7psi all the time, but instead i bypassed the solenoid completely (like you have above) and i was able to hit 1 bar with no problems. the engine sounded like a rocket and i could hear detonation (or a form of tapping) so i backed off, i tried it a few times and could repeat would hit the full +7 on the stocker guage. Unsure why yours is only going to 0.50 bar, or perhaps why mine would just goto 1 bar? Going to 0.50bar is the stocker wastegate actuator

correct? Does this make sense?

The standard wastegate actuator spring is ~4 psi, as that is the lowest standard boost level. To get to ~7 psi, the solenoid bypasses airflow so that the pressure at the wastegate actuator is 4 psi. This is regulated by the ECU controlling the solenoid opening. If you electrically wire up the solenoid, so that it is always open, then the max boost is limited by the amount of pressure bypassed. If you leave the plumbing exactly as per standard that appears to be ~12 psi.

The solenoid is a normally closed design, by wiring it so that it is fully open all the time you are puting it under load that it is not designed for. It will eventually overheat and fail.

Since 12 psi is higher than I would recommend for a ceramic turbine (I like to stick to 10 psi) and I didn't want my solenoid failing (I needed to use it with the IEBC) I rerouted the vacuum hoses as per the picture (and words) a couple of pages back.

Hope that makes sense:cheers:

Hey Sk in reference to your 0.5 bar solution on Page 2. I have had a few probs.

This is how I put it together at first. The restrictor you are talking about is standard in the first hose from inlet pipe to T piece right?

see pic please:

my.php?loc=img81ℑ=lowres4kp.jpg

So I left that in, the only thing I changed was I put the outlet of the solenoid straight onto the T piece (the one that flows back into turbo)

Boost then rose to 3/4 on the stock gauge (where I would back off) whereas before I just had a constant earth on the sloenoid I was just above 1/2

What I think is the standard solenoid or in one of those smaller diameter hoses there is a restrictor??? Otherwise this should have worked.

I understand what I did must have bled off too much air hence the wastegate actuator sees less pressure.

I then hooked it up as you said on page2 but I didnt use the restrictor from the first bit of hose (I dont know how you would get it out without cutting the hose, maybe you can push it out with a bit of wire?)

Boost was a fair bit higher than normal.

So now it is back to stock with the solenoid earthed to give the 7-8psi.

Any thoughts/..

I don't really see how your method works now...where did you put the resrictor? In the hose to the turbo inlet? shouldnt that then make more boost than the setup that I had...

SolenoidBypassSmall.jpg[/img]

OK, this is the picture of the vacuum hoses. The boost pressure comes out of the intercooler return pipe (that's the big black one on the left) via the standard fitting. It travels down the vacuum hose to the standard T piece.

The right hand side of the T piece goes to the wastegate actuator via another short piece of vacuum hose. It has 2 standard spring clamps on it. So that "some" of the boost pressure goes to the wastegate actuator.

The left hand side of the T piece is connected to another (longer) piece of vacuum hose thaty goes to the standard fitting on the BOV return pipe. You can't see that fitting in the picture as it is hidden by the (big black) turbo to intercooler pipe. I squeezed the standard restrictor into that vacuum hose, it is tight fit, so be patient and use some lubricant (RP7 in my case).

The restrictor limits the amount of boost pressure that is bled off, so that the "some" pressure that goes to the wastegate actuator is actually less than the boost pressure. This means you get more boost before the wastegate opens at its usual 4-5 psi. How much more depends on the size of the hole in the restrictor, the bigger the hole the more it bypasses and the higher the boost.

The standard hole is ~1.25 mm and gave ~0.5 bar on my Stagea, which has standard everything else (no exhaust, no FMIC, std filter, etc). If you have mods, you may not get the same boost pressure, so you may have to adjust the size of the hole in the restrictor, it is brass so you can easily solder it up and redrill the hole smaller if necessary.

Hope that clarifies:cheers:

OK Sk. I understand that but the restrictor you're talking about - is it in this tube or is this another one - looks like more than 1.25mm in the flesh though.

img01270ir.jpg[/img]

img01289ur.jpg

So mine was boosting too much because I didnt have the restrictor on the to turbo inlet hose i..e too much was escaping. - But I still had it in the hose from inlet. Does the boost solenoid know how much to bleed or is there the restrictor here that I dont know about?

Many thanks

lowres7hz.jpg

Hey SK .. just like to say.. Nice one Brova ! a real pleasure following your threads !

Question RE the IEB Controller .. the instructions say "dont get the two PIC Microcontrollers (IC1 & IC2) mixed up" i cant tell the diff between the two ?? they have the same code on them ??

plus i built the kit based on the instructions given (B&W) and realised afterwards that the same intructions are in color in the Project Book !!!!!

thanks

:)

OK Sk.  I understand that but the restrictor you're talking about - is it in this tube or is this another one - looks like more than 1.25mm in the flesh though.

So mine was boosting too much because I didnt have the restrictor on the to turbo inlet hose i..e too much was escaping. - But I still had it in the hose from inlet.  Does the boost solenoid know how much to bleed or is there the restrictor here that I dont know about?

Many thanks

Yep, on the Stagea the hole was 1.25 mm, I measured it with my verniers.

Having it in the hose from the intercooler pipe does nothing for boost limiting, it just slows down the air movement though the vacuum hose. That's why it is there, Nisssan use it for dampening the boost hits.

The ECU tells the solenoid how much air pressure to bypass, the solenoid pulses (opens) at the programmed rate.

:)

Hey SK .. just like to say.. Nice one Brova ! a real pleasure following your threads !

Question RE the IEB Controller .. the instructions say "dont get the two PIC Microcontrollers (IC1 & IC2) mixed up" i cant tell the diff between the two ?? they have the same code on them ??  

plus i built the kit based on the instructions given (B&W) and realised afterwards that the same intructions are in color in the Project Book !!!!!  

thanks

:)

The PIC's are the same part number, but they have different programs loaded into them. One has a white dot painted on it, the other a white stripe, you can see them in the pictures.

Hope that helps:cheers:

so that restrictor in the hose from the intercooler is the one you have utilised. So it is only coincedence that it ends up to be the right hole size to bypass enough air to hold 7-8psi like the solenoid.

As far as I can tell thesolenoid has an ECU triggered negative. Isn't it either open or shut.

There are two ways of telling. First, you put both in and see whether it works. (This is how we did it because, like you, we didn't see where it showed the difference) :Oops:

Alternatively, you can see in the Jaycar parts list on page 2 it says that one is marked with a dot and the other is marked with a line.

El Bee :)

so that restrictor in the hose from the intercooler is the one you have utilised.  So it is only coincedence that it ends up to be the right hole size to bypass enough air to hold 7-8psi like the solenoid.

Yeh, lucky, hey. It was coincidently the right size, most bypasses are 0.75 to 1.5 mm so not tooooooo much of a coincidence. Obviously it had to flow greater than 4 psi (the lowest std boost setting) otherwise Nissan would have needed to use a bigger hole to dampen the air flow. So I knew it would be more than 4 psi when using it as a bypass. I had a target of 0.5 bar but I would have been happy at 0.4 or 0.6 bar. It ended up right in the middle at 0.5, so no worries.

As far as I can tell thesolenoid has an ECU triggered negative. Isn't it either open or shut.

Ahhhhhh yes, but it pulses open-shut-open-shut-open-shut.............. The frequency and duration of the pulses determine how much air it bypasses.

:)

im pretty sure when I tested the grounding signal from the ECU it was at 4500rpm that it completed the circuit. i.e. sending the signal to the Solenoid to open. I also thought the signal stayed till revs dropped below 4500rpm.

Maybe I'm wrong.

Thanks for the clarification on the restrictor

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1680, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
    • hahah when youtube subscribers are faster than my updates here. Yes some vid from the day is up, here:  Note that as with all track day videos it is boring watching after the bloopers at the start.  The off was a genuine surprise to me, I've literally done a thousand laps around the place and I've never had instability there; basically it rolled into oversteer, slipped, gripped and spat me out. On the way off I mowed down one of the instructor's cones and it sat there all day looking at me with accusing cone eyes as I drove past. 1:13:20 was my fastest lap, and it was in the second session, 3rd lap.  It (or me!) got slower throughout the day as it got hotter.      
×
×
  • Create New...