Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

quite a coincidence i turned up and saw your ten eh.. that was the first time i had been to watch the drags at all.. (and wednesday was my second visit and first run)

ill check out the videos now one just finished downloading..

thanks again for the advice, i think i will also turn up again in a few months (cant be taking time off every week!) for another run. in the meantime ill have a go at a trackday if one comes up...

ps kenny, are you sure your turbos are large enough?

Holy farking christ, Kenny!

I love it when you talk like that Adrian. ;-)

ill check out the videos now one just finished downloading..

Cool, here are some direct links to the movies. You need DivX to watch them I think.

25th August 2004

First ten second pass incar, stand File size 15.8M Codec: DivX Pro 5.2

First ten second pass stand File size 9.8M Codec: DivX 5.1.1

18th August 2004

Five passes on street radials File size 65.7M Codec: DivX Pro 5.2

In car showing boost gauge, speedo and tacho File size 9.8M Codec: DivX 5.1.1

28th July 2004

Three easy pieces File size 24.8M Codec: DivX 5.1.1

Alternate takes of wins vs Raima and Mopar Boy File size 15.5M Codec: DivX 5.1.1

Racing Raima File size 17.7M Codec: DivX 5.1.1

Racing Mopar Boy File size 24.8M Codec: DivX 5.1.1

21st July 2004

21st July passes File size 30.6M Codec: DivX 5.1.1

14th July 2004

14th July passes File size 32.0M Codec: DivX 5.1.1

thanks again for the advice, i think i will also turn up again in a few months (cant be taking time off every week!) for another run. in the meantime ill have a go at a trackday if one comes up...

Obviously the Winter months are when the badass contingent comes out to play. Sounds like you've been bitten by the bug!

ps kenny, are you sure your turbos are large enough?

Hehe. The new turbo is mocked in place inthe foreground, the old turbo (the one I used on the ten second pass) is held by Herbert in the background.

M Coupes only need one turbo to run you know!

Kenny,

Are you gonna skin the rear bar now it's lightened?

What dash are you using?  Old OEM one or fabricating an Aluminium one?  Motec???

Turbo specs for new one?

Adrian

Adrian, stock bodywork will be replaced, it's just off to fit up the parachute anchor.

Using a Stack dash with a Stack boost gauge, Autometer shift light and warning light. Erik will work out how to fit all that shit into the OEM dashboard.

Staying with the BMW ECU with piggyback.

Running a larger Garrett ball bearing turbo now.

Your TS seems very low for the mods you have. I would put your car on a dyno for a tune

i might get it checked out in a while, i got the car in its current tune, it feels right for what it is... it felt quite slow that day i think because of the heat...

but yeah i know that other cars with similar or less mods have higher mph. i know the motor is good though as i have checked compression so it cant be that..

Yeah that time seems very slow for the mods.

I ran a 13.9, 2.2 60ft'r at 205mph with 'just'

- Front Mount

- 13psi

- Turbo Back Exhaust

- POD FILTA BRO!

No suspension mods, and on 235 Marshal Racers (Very very poor tyres)

The morning I went down the strip I had it dyno'd and there was a problem, it wouldn't get over 100kw, the crank angle sensor was full retarded and we only knocked the CAS forward so I could have more power, ran again with 169kw

An as benm said, you really do have to drive it like you stole it, don't be scared to go that extra step you don't on the street :D

Yeah that time seems very slow for the mods.

I ran a 13.9, 2.2 60ft'r at 205mph with 'just'

- Front Mount

- 13psi

- Turbo Back Exhaust

- POD FILTA BRO!

No suspension mods, and on 235 Marshal Racers (Very very poor tyres)

The morning I went down the strip I had it dyno'd and there was a problem, it wouldn't get over 100kw, the crank angle sensor was full retarded and we only knocked the CAS forward so I could have more power, ran again with 169kw

An as benm said, you really do have to drive it like you stole it, don't be scared to go that extra step you don't on the street :P

mate trust me im not scared to drive the thing hard :P :P

Doing fine , i still have the trap speed on him though .

I don't think i'll be doing anymore to this car , i'm waiting for my r34 gtr ( its in Osaka waiting for a ship ) .

Mick should be a bit quicker next time at wsid , new spark plugs fitted and spark plug cover off , thats got to be an extra .2 - .3 sec quicker !

When are you going there next ?

Doing fine , i still have the trap speed on him though .

I don't think i'll be doing anymore to this car , i'm waiting for my r34 gtr ( its in Osaka waiting for a ship ) .

Mick should be a bit quicker next time at wsid , new spark plugs fitted and spark plug cover off , thats got to be an extra .2 - .3 sec quicker !

When are you going there next ?

Good to here about the R34 on the way. Mick's Skyline will definitely improve ET and trap speed with the spark plugs. Imagine if he gave it a wash!

We will be out when this phase of build on the M Coupe is completed. We will have to run the new engine in before the final tune as well so we should be out again April-May 2005.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...