Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

With a Electronic Boost control can you alter boost pressure at different rpms. Im getting 17psi at 4500rpm and then it drops off too 12psi and peak revs. This is using a HKS actuator and no bleed valve so its not the actuator spring. So i thought with a EBC could i dial in more boost pressure at say 6000rpm.

Can i do this?

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Some EBC's are not intelligent.

Some operate in a closed loop mode that monitors boost and adjusts the duty cycle to suit. The cheaper EBC's tend to have a fixed duty cycle which is why you get boost dropping at higher rpm's.

I used to own a Blitz SBC-ID EBC that had a manual function and auto function.

The manual function was like the regular ebc where you set it to a duty cycle.. Say 43. then you set the gain which controls how fast boost reaches that duty cycle peak if that makes sense. It would make 15psi then tapper off to 12.5psi by 7000rpm.

Then there was the auto function that would require you to dial in the boost you want (say 15psi) it would then slowly learn the boost curve and adjust the duty cycle to suit. This would require multiple 7000rpm runs.

Once learnt it knows that it has to reduce the duty cycle in order to hold that 15psi a certian RPM. It would then hold 15psi to redline.

Wait until you get the PowerFC & get the boost controller to suit that. :mad:

The PowerFC boost controller is essentially the same as the AVCR which is a very good boost controller. Some do not like the AVCR due to its complexity and thoughts that a bigger solanoid is better. Which is untrue. :mad:

EDIT: Stock turbo or not.. It has nothing to do with it. A good EBC will hold boost. i.e the rb20t turbo was able to push 16psi at 7000rpm on the rb20det when with a crappy bleeder it would tapper off to 12.5psi. You need an intelligent EBC. AVCR, Blitz SBC-id or the Greedy E0-1 (Expensive) I think it is.

How good of a boost controller do you consider something like a GReddy Profec B-Spec II, or even a Spec-S?

Some EBC's are not intelligent.

 

Some operate in a closed loop mode that monitors boost and adjusts the duty cycle to suit. The cheaper EBC's tend to have a fixed duty cycle which is why you get boost dropping at higher rpm's.

 

 I used to own a Blitz SBC-ID EBC that had a manual function and auto function.

The manual function was like the regular ebc where you set it to a duty cycle.. Say 43. then you set the gain which controls how fast boost reaches that duty cycle peak if that makes sense. It would make 15psi then tapper off to 12.5psi by 7000rpm.

 

Then there was the auto function that would require you to dial in the boost you want (say 15psi) it would then slowly learn the boost curve and adjust the duty cycle to suit. This would require multiple 7000rpm runs.

Once learnt it knows that it has to reduce the duty cycle in order to hold that 15psi a certian RPM. It would then hold 15psi to redline.

 

 Wait until you get the PowerFC & get the boost controller to suit that. :cheers:

The PowerFC boost controller is essentially the same as the AVCR which is a very good boost controller. Some do not like the AVCR due to its complexity and thoughts that a bigger solanoid is better. Which is untrue. ;)

 

EDIT: Stock turbo or not.. It has nothing to do with it. A good EBC will hold boost. i.e the rb20t turbo was able to push 16psi at 7000rpm on the rb20det when with a crappy bleeder it would tapper off to 12.5psi. You need an intelligent EBC. AVCR, Blitz SBC-id or the Greedy E0-1 (Expensive) I think it is.

AVCR lets you do everything. :cheers:

fuzzy logic, rpm & gear based boost. everything.

GReddy Profec B-Spec II, or even a Spec-S...

I don't know I would have to read up if it has a boost curve learning mode.

If you simply dial in a number say 42 or 45 that has no correlation to the boost figure

its self then it is based on a percentage of maximum boost hence duty cycle.

That is when you will run in to trouble as you cannot get the boost controller to increase or reduce the duty cycle when needed to hold a certian boost.

you will never be able to sustain 17psi throughout the entire on-boost rev range with a 2530 on an rb25. 2 different tuners in here in SA explained from their experience that apparently there is too much exhaust flow from the rb25 at the top end, where the compressor is "spun out of its efficiency" and starts to "chop" the intake air rather than compress it. we were also running 17psi and it always dropped off to 13psi at the top end. in this case, its the turbo, not the EBC that is responsible for the pressure drop. Before we we're told this we had tried 2 different wastegate actuators and 2 reputatable EBC's, all to no avail.

just be happy with the mid-range :D

a HKS EVC 3 or 4 will give the best control out of all of em...

but doesnt offer the fancy stuff like Gears vs Boost... guess thats why they are $150 cheaper. No flashy shit. Just controls boost you ask for

you will never be able to sustain 17psi throughout the entire on-boost rev range with a 2530 on an rb25. 2 different tuners in here in SA explained from their experience that apparently there is too much exhaust flow from the rb25 at the top end, where the compressor is "spun out of its efficiency" and starts to "chop" the intake air rather than compress it. we were also running 17psi and it always dropped off to 13psi at the top end. in this case, its the turbo, not the EBC that is responsible for the pressure drop. Before we we're told this we had tried 2 different wastegate actuators and 2 reputatable EBC's, all to no avail.  

just be happy with the mid-range :D

But i was thinking i could run 17psi in the midrange and when it starts to drop, somehow try and squeeze more boost into it without trying to boost to more than 17 in the middle.

Mate you can up the boost all you want but with a 2530 all ya gunna do is make hot air. And all that will do is bring you that bit closer to detonation.

and you know this because why?

do you know where a 2530's Efficiency range is?

its certainly not at low boost - 10-15psi. HKS turbos are designed to perform better at higher boost... not just "make hot air"

How good of a boost controller do you consider something like a GReddy Profec B-Spec II, or even a Spec-S?

Greddy Profec Spec S is like the old Profec B just with an upgraded solenoid.

Profec B Spec II is a bit of a pain to set up.

Check the link bellow, its bit old but good info.

http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/tech/020...boostcontrol05/

Mate you can up the boost all you want but with a 2530 all ya gunna do is make hot air. And all that will do is bring you that bit closer to detonation.

no offense, but i dont think youve had much, if any, experience with 2530's on rb25's, because if you had, youd know that you cant "up the boost all you want".

not trying to shit stir here, but im coming from direct experience in collaboration with 2 reputable SA tuners.

Mate you can up the boost all you want but with a 2530 all ya gunna do is make hot air. And all that will do is bring you that bit closer to detonation.

no offense, but i dont think you've had much, if any, experience with 2530's on rb25's, because if you had, youd know that you cant "up the boost all you want". if you have had experience with this setup, i really want to know how you did it, because it was a real pain in the arse :)

i think if it was capable of sustaining 17psi at the top end, after all the tuning and trying different things, we would have been able to make it happen.

now on a rb20, its a different story, smaller engine, less exhaust gasses. my good friend with a 2530 on his r32, making 240rwkw, can sustain up to and over 17psi across the top end.

not trying to shit stir here, but im coming from direct experience in collaboration with 2 SA tuners.

But i was thinking i could run 17psi in the midrange and when it starts to drop, somehow try and squeeze more boost into it without trying to boost to more than 17 in the middle.

it seems to be all due to excessive exhaust gasses. i've always thought that if you enlarged the wastegate, you would be able to bypass more exhaust, slowing down the exhaust turbine and hence bring the compressor back into its efficiency. does that sound right?

i know its not all about the exhaust turbine and housing that matters, but, we have a 2835proS on the 25 now and both the exhaust turbine and its housing is considerably larger than the 2530, and it sustains 17psi rock steady across the top end, and wants to keep going. its so easy to hit the limiter because there is no letting up in the power delivery. after a rebuild it would be interesting to see if we could find the point, if there is one, where boost drops off at the top end with this turbo. but i dont think id like to push it that hard :)

But i was thinking i could run 17psi in the midrange and when it starts to drop, somehow try and squeeze more boost into it without trying to boost to more than 17 in the middle.

it seems to be all due to excessive exhaust gasses. i've always thought that if you enlarged the wastegate, you would be able to bypass more exhaust, slowing down the exhaust turbine and hence bring the compressor back into its efficiency. does that sound right?

it seems to be all due to excessive exhaust gasses. i've always thought that if you enlarged the wastegate, you would be able to bypass more exhaust, slowing down the exhaust turbine and hence bring the compressor back into its efficiency. does that sound right?

The wastegate on a HKS 2530 is bigger than the stock R33 turbo, i guess its still not big enough.

Does the 2535 have a bigger exhaust wheel than the 2530?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...