Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

I am just wondering if anyone can tell me about the physical size differences between nissan brakes.

My car currently has R32 GTS-t brakes on the front and Z32 on the rear.

Now with the style of my mags i have about 5-6mm of clearance between the brake caliper and the wheel.

I would like to upgrade my brakes at a later date, but i dont want to upgrade and then find that my wheels do not clear the calipers.

Are R32 GTR brakes the same as the GTS-t?

Are R33/34 Brembo's larger in physical size? ie will i have clearance issues?

cheers :)

Dave

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/62647-physical-size-of-brakes/
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

I am just wondering if anyone can tell me about the physical size differences between nissan brakes.

My car currently has R32 GTS-t brakes on the front and Z32 on the rear.

Now with the style of my mags i have about 5-6mm of clearance between the brake caliper and the wheel.

I would like to upgrade my brakes at a later date, but i dont want to upgrade and then find that my wheels do not clear the calipers.

Are R32 GTR brakes the same as the GTS-t?

Are R33/34 Brembo's larger in physical size? ie will i have clearance issues?

cheers :D

Dave

Hi Dave, you are asking an impossible question. The clearance issues are 3 dimensional, individually the dimensions themselves mean nothing, it's their relationship to each other that matters. You would need a 3 dimensional CAD drawing for them to be useful.

To answer your questions;

GTST callipers are different to GTR callipers, they are further out from the upright. This allows larger diameter disks, the DBA catalogue tells you how much.

Brembo's are larger in diameter, the DBA catalogue tells you how much.

The best way to tell if the wheels are going to fit is to look them up for the car that you are using the brakes from. If they fit that car, then chances are they will fit yours, when you put that car's brakes on.

For a quick clearance check, take the rotor diameter and add 25 mm to allow for the calliper diameter.

Hope that helps:cheers:

cheers Joel,

I really want something that is going to slow down a 1500+kg car after utilising my hopeful 500hp... i've had a few scary moments with the current brakes.. maybe they just need new, decent pads

cheers Joel,

I really want something that is going to slow down a 1500+kg car after utilising my hopeful 500hp... i've had a few scary moments with the current brakes.. maybe they just need new, decent pads

Maybe also new fluid, braided lines, disks, and I dunno about your modle skyline but maybe one of those fancy pants brake booster stoppers???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...