Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Are you planning on running both front seats?

As I noticed this in the Sports RWD regs

Complete interior, including dashboard, door panels, headliner etc., mandatory. Rear seat may be removed. Two matching front seats mandatory. Aftermarket seats permitted, but must be fully upholstered. All factory controls must be retained and operative; i.e., lights, signals, horn, windows and wipers.

muahahahha welcome to my world mate :cheers: Thats exactly the same regs as touring cars except we somehow have to get the rear seat back in as well.

Try fitting all that crap back in once you've got a cage in there :)

you need a pair of our race seats, nice and light and hold you inplace.

Are you planning on running both front seats?

As I noticed this in the Sports RWD regs

Complete interior, including dashboard, door panels, headliner etc., mandatory. Rear seat may be removed. Two matching front seats mandatory. Aftermarket seats permitted, but must be fully upholstered. All factory controls must be retained and operative; i.e., lights, signals, horn, windows and wipers.

Sanchez, yes we've got two matching fully upholstered seats fitted, as well as the interior pieces and operative controls.

I spoke to Jason O'Halloran extensively about the build as we were planning it to make sure we're in the green as far as rules go.

SATURDAY 19th MARCH 2005

A.M.

7.00 :Competitor gates  

7.30 - 9.30 : Show-N-Shine Registration  

7.30 - 2.30 : Drag Race Registration  

8.30 : Spectator gates open

11.00 - 1.30 : Street Tyre Qualifying  

10.00 - 3.00 : Show-N-Shine  

10.00 - 3.00 : Club Display  

10.00 - 1.00 : Sound Off  

10.00 : Dance Show  

11.00 : Babe Comp  

P.M.

12.00 : Dance Show  

1.00 : Bikini Comp  

1.30 : Motorcycle Stunt Show  

2.00 - 5.00 : Slick Tyre Qualifying  

2.00 : Pro RWD Qualifying Session  

3.15 : Pro RWD Qualifying Session  

4.30 : Pro RWD Qualifying Session  

5.30 : Racing  

6.00 : Glow Off

Adrian

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Guest two.06l
Awesome work getting it ready in time Paul and Stace, I'm really excited to see it out racing again especially with the 405awkw

405awkw......who said that.....could only be one person....should have just posted it in a thread....wait till its tuned on motorsport 103 with a better boost controller (AVC-Rs cant hold high boost). Drives like an animal, almost scary. Have not given it full throttle yet.

P.S. burnouts are for pu55ys who can't get low e.t.'s

405awkw......who said that.....could only be one person....should have just posted it in a thread....wait till its tuned on motorsport 103 with a better boost controller (AVC-Rs cant hold high boost). Drives like an animal, almost scary. Have not given it full throttle yet.  

P.S. burnouts are for pu55ys who can't get low e.t.'s

You said it right http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...735#post1251735 there yesterday??? I'm not sure what your talking about

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...