Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

HI all its that time again and the first drift day for the year.

Where: Hidden Valley Race Course.

When : Practice day Saturday 19th of Feb

Drift day Sunday 20th of Feb

Cost :$55 each day or $93.50 for both days

Vehicle must be their on the Saturday to get the vehicle scrutineered ( road worthied) Scrutineering is between 11:00am till 1:00pm on the Saturday. If you find this hard to get your vehicle scrutineered on the Saturday, try to get some one to take the car down for the scrutineering. But if you still have a problem getting your car their they will accept them only BEFORE 9:30am on the Sunday and NO time after that!!

It will be run like the previous day for those who where their on the day.

Vehicle's must be in roadworthy condition not necessarly registered

Drivers must have a long sleave shirt, long pants, covered shoe's and a helmet

A canten will the their on the Sunday for Food and drinks

Any other questions or problems pls don't hesitate to call either myself or Laurie

Andrew (ADRNLN) 0438890852

Laurie 0417834884

cheers all and happy drifting

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63815-drift-day-in-darwin-20th-feb/
Share on other sites

Well ppl here is the program for sunday 20th Feb 2005.

8:40am - Officials briefing

9:00am - Clubsport warmup commences

9:15am - Warmup commences - all other classes

10:00am - Drivers Briefing

10:30am - Round 1

- Combinedimprovement production car

- Lapsprint

- HQ Holdens

- Drifters

11:45am -Round 2 as above

1:00pm - Round 3 as above

2:15pm - Round 4 as above with extended Drift Session

4:00pm - Presentation & BBQ on Club House Hill

Hope to see you all there.

:rofl: ICE

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...