Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi, I had the TE37 17 x 9 wheels on my GTR, the front is 245/40 and rear is 255/40. Today I went to bob jane to ask about new tyres, they said I can put 235 at the front and 255 and the rear. Just want to know is that safe? I'm not driving the GTR very often, coz I got a daily drive car. But I just want to know the difference between the F:235 R:255 and F:245 R:255. Anyone can help?

Also wanna ask the price with these tyres? THx!!!!

Everything I've read says that you need to have EXACTLY the same rolling radius at all 4 corners, else your ATESSA system will have a caniption fit, so that means IDENTICAL rims and tyres.

And for the sake of 10mm extra why bother? just go 245 all round.

No! No! No! The ATTESSA doesn't care about the WIDTH.

The DIAMETER should be the same, but that is NOT the same as width. So you can have 225/45/17's on the front and 255/40/17's on the rear. The rolling circumference will be the same.

:(

PS; if you had done a search you would have found plenty of posts on why this is the case.

what about the width of the WHEEL?

I'd always understood that the GTR should have equal width (and diameter) wheels and tyres front to rear? That would be pretty cool if you can just use different sized wheels/tyres.

what about the width of the WHEEL?

I'd always understood that the GTR should have equal width (and diameter) wheels and tyres front to rear? That would be pretty cool if you can just use different sized wheels/tyres.

I have driven a GTR over 200k's with the space saver spare on the front, the ATTESSA didn't even know. The torque split looked quite normal to me, I even palyed with the torque splt controller, just for fun.:cheers:

No, only tyre circumference needs to be the same as the ATTESA works on front to back wheel speed differences. So you can have those 12" wide deep dish wheels on the back, Richard, so long as the tyre circumference is the same. :cheers:

No!  No!  No!  The ATTESSA doesn't care about the WIDTH.

The DIAMETER should be the same, but that is NOT the same as width.  So you can have 225/45/17's on the front and 255/40/17's on the rear.  The rolling circumference will be the same.

:)

PS; if you had done a search you would have found plenty of posts on why this is the case.

So what that means is I still can get 255/40/17's at the rear with 235/40/17's at the front? Just have to get the width at the same size? is that what u mean?

So what that means is I still can get 255/40/17's at the rear with 235/40/17's at the front? Just have to get the width at the same size? is that what u mean?

Ah no! Perhaps a quick explanation of tyre sizes might help

235 = 235 mm wide

255 = 255 mm wide

40 = 40% of the width (that's the measurement from the outside of the tyre to the rim)

17 = 17 inches, the rim diameter

So 235 X 40% = 94 mm

And 255 X 40% = 102 mm

So they are NOT the same circumference.

If you want 255/40 on the rear (102mm) then you need 235/45 on the front (105mm). Check the alternatives with the tyre shop that you are going to buy your tyres from, they have equivalency charts (so their customers can keep their speedos accurate).:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...