Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

240rwkw....very nice.

I am definately going to get cam gears...no doubt about it.

Mick, what kind of power did you make before you dialled in the cam gears?

did you dyno it before you dialled them in..when your afms have been replaced n stuff?

thanks for the replies ppl......

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The cam gears are standard ones that are modified by an engineer. Heaps of other done with no troubles. They were done through ICE Performance and dialed in by Ben at Race Pace.

Peak power was still 200 odd with the AFM fixed and gears not dialed in. We uped the boost one pound (15.5 pound I have a 33 motor etc in the car) and dialed the cams in and it just touched 240 on the knocker. But like I said it is the way it does it that is so impressive. It comes on so much stronger so much lower. No wear near as peaky. It is going well at 2000, really strong by 3000 and over 200rwkw by 4200. It is juts so much more drivable. It was great before but is heaps better now. The engine is a lot smoother too (and I thought it was bloody smooth before). Ben believes that I could get 250 if I got rid of the cat and got more radical with the timing but I think I will keep it as is for a while. It is very impressive. It is a big change.

If you want too PM me a fax number (my scanner has gone kaput at the moment) and I can fax the dyno sheet too you. The difference on paper is massive through the mid range. The difference in real is even better :D

Mick.

just reading around some other threads. People are saying that the HKS cam gears are unreliable...is this true?

something to do with that the teeth wear and theres only 3 bolts to hold them in place....and that under load...the belt can slip, which in turn ****s up the timing.

SHIT! :D

anyone shed some light?

BoOsTeD_RB26,

I don't think it is worth repeating the other thread's here, it would be better if all the info was kept in those threads so that it is easier to find.

There are rumors that the HKS gears are unreliable, but there are many other options available, so some of us may try them.

See'ya:burnout:

Originally posted by BoOsTeD_RB26

Silver-Arrows: what kind of performance gains did you get?....the suspension has already been done by the way. the mods i listed were only the mods associated with the power of the car.

how much would a power fc set me back....but just the FC....not hand controller...perhaps i will consider it but i dunno..have to see.

an additional odd $700 seems alot for just the fc.....what are the benefits of the fc?

either way...im definately going to get the cam gears

if ur in melb,go straight to race pace,ben will sort u out and u shouldnt need a powerfc or afc.

afc is a toy,wouldnt bother wasting ur bucks.around 240kw is achieviable without both of them ,provided u have a good engine to start with.cam gears are u must!

Go for the Power Fc Plug it in or unplug it and sell it if you dont need it anymore. No butchering of wiring and heaps more tunable than other bits and pieces u wana get. Cam gears dont waste your money just drill the standard ones and dial them in. sell Your boost controller. I dont know why people waste their money on boost controllers when they run relatively low boost levels. Your right foot is the cheapest boost controller.

the problem is not where to begin but when to stop. Its a disease i tell u.

Originally posted by GTR98

Go for the Power Fc Plug it in or unplug it and sell it if you dont need it anymore.  No butchering of wiring and heaps more tunable than other bits and pieces u wana get.  Cam gears dont waste your money just drill the standard ones and dial them in. sell Your boost controller.  I dont know why people waste their money on boost controllers when they run relatively low boost levels.  Your right foot is the cheapest boost controller.

the problem is not where to begin but when to stop.  Its a disease i tell u.

can u clarify what u mean for all of us wasting our money on boost controllers,how u control boost with ur foot

Not to insult anyone but if your running standard turbo's and your wanting 1bar max boost then just remove the restrictor and save your money. If you want a little more boost use a mechanical controller and set it where you want it. Then as you drive if you want to go faster then put your foot down further. Correct me if im wrong b/c im no mechanic so i probably shouldnt even comment but an EBC is for running high boost levels and low boost levels eg 1Bar. BUT with stock turbos why waiste money on EBC when you cant get more than 1Bar safely?

Originally posted by GTR98

Not to insult anyone but if your running standard turbo's and your wanting 1bar max boost then just remove the restrictor and save your money.  If you want a little more boost use a mechanical controller and set it where you want it.  Then as you drive if you want to go faster then put your foot down further.  Correct me if im wrong b/c im no mechanic so i probably shouldnt even comment but an EBC is for running high boost levels and low boost levels eg 1Bar.  BUT with stock turbos why waiste money on EBC when you cant get more than 1Bar safely?

glad to see u have clafified what u were saying,dunno what its got to do with your foot though.

your right removing the restrictor should get close to 1bar,but a mechanical bleed isnt as accurate as a elec solenoid,this is why most people prefer.

lets assume ur running 16psi with a bleed.this can alter depending on temeprature etc,its a little easier to conrol inside the cabin with a elec boost controller.if ur running a gtr on standard turbos u dont really want it going above16psi for sustained periods.

Between EBC and mechanical valve, I'd go EBC.

It holds boost better and doesn't spike as much. Also you have to re-adjust mechanical in summer and winter due to air temp difference.

But I'm running standard minus restrictor at the moment cause I've got no plans to go past 1 bar yet.

Originally posted by Silver-Arrowz

Between EBC and mechanical valve, I'd go EBC.

It holds boost better and doesn't spike as much. Also you have to re-adjust mechanical in summer and winter due to air temp difference.

But I'm running standard minus restrictor at the moment cause I've got no plans to go past 1 bar yet.

great minds think alike.

or is that fools seldom differ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, I'm tired. I'm tired because about 4PM yesterday, before today's appointment someone immediately bought my bumper. They couldn't get it any other day as they're on the way back to NSW. So I had to do that big GTR conversion I had been planning. Unfortunately, the information on SAU about what you need and how this is done is incomplete. So what should be a simple bolt on affair, yeah, it's not. Did you know if you use all GTR items the bonnet won't close? This little manuever sent me into about 1am the night before trying to dodge a way to get it closed. I will have to revisit this in the next few days  - or maybe not, I may let a body shop figure it out. It all needs to come up and my motivation to pull the bumper off is low. It also seems to hit things in the bay where the GTT bonnet didn't. Yes I used 100% new OEM GTR items. Today, I had the joy of driving to the dyno looking like this: Given I had roughed in the fuel and given sensible but pretty conservative timing, I didn't really bet on having the car drive out any real difference than when it drove in. Sadly due to a miscommunication and laptop fun and games (and almost bricking the dongle, prayers and firmware updates indeed), I ended up using HP Tuner credits to licence the car that was already licenced. So in the end my laptop was used. It turns out my butt dyno is still well calibrated after all this time. The 325kw was on 74% Ethanol, the 313kw line was on 98. The other line is the 'before' line which was 281kw. While the numbers are pretty low, they're pretty in line with what you'd expect. Even if US dynos bump the whole result up about 50KW, gaining 10-15% is similar gains.  The curve of the cam is pretty much spot on with what was discussed as well. All this said, it still feels bad to not see the number you secretly want to see. Even if the car drove great beforehand, and I knew pretty confidently the car would drive out much the same way it drove in due to the nature of a wellish dialled in LS1 not gaining much if anything at all from being tuned from where it was. As expected, the car isn't particularly sensitive to running it at anywhere between 12.0 and 13.0 - And the initial timing at 20deg and 12.0 made 308KW. So 3 degrees of timing, and leaning it out to 12.7 for 5kw, anything above stopped giving any benefit until E85 (which has an additional 2 deg as before). Car itself behaved entirely fine. I found out that 100C = 1.15V! IAT at about 7pm was 19C. I might mess with the bonnet mounting.. but given the REO NEEDS TO BE CHOPPED TO FIT A GTR BAR this is possibly something I may leave gathering (more) dust until it returns to paint jail.
    • It sounds farrrrrrr too cold at your place Duncan... Here I was thinking our 10 degrees overnight is getting cold...
    • oh yeah, reminded this morning....bin lids frozen shut too
    • In my case not, because of total reno. But yeah.
    • Did you use an electronic speedo drive? Does you speedometer read all the way to 180km?
×
×
  • Create New...