Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Unlike the rb20det it makes a difference if I boost it around everywhere.

The RB20DET would always get 470km's to a tank of juice.

The RB30DET if heavy with the foot will get a minimum of 430 and a best of 520 with a light cruising foot.

Nice result there Joel!

Can't wait to get the last few parts to go onto my RB31. Then I can get it all tuned!

Just have to get the turbo highflowed (RB25 S2 turbo) and decide on what injectors I want to go. Not sure if I want 550's or 600's. They are both the same cost.

Unlike the rb20det it makes a difference if I boost it around everywhere.

 

The RB20DET would always get 470km's to a tank of juice.

 

The RB30DET if heavy with the foot will get a minimum of 430 and a best of 520 with a light cruising foot.

Thats not too bad hey. I guess also with still running the rb20 turbo its on boost 90% of the time.

Im getting about 570kms to the tank atm, so I guess if I did it with my pansyarse driving I should get 500kms a tank easy. Its fair for a ballistic motor :)

Unlike the rb20det it makes a difference if I boost it around everywhere.

 

The RB20DET would always get 470km's to a tank of juice.

 

The RB30DET if heavy with the foot will get a minimum of 430 and a best of 520 with a light cruising foot.

must be a rb20 thing.. i put my foot down everywere always get around 400 to a full tank 300 by 1/4 left.. no matter how i drive :) weather its like i stole it or miss daisy but meh hopefully a rb30det will be in my engine bay by the end of the year.. (if i get my act together n start working again)

nice results tho

Unlike the rb20det it makes a difference if I boost it around everywhere.

 

The RB20DET would always get 470km's to a tank of juice.

 

The RB30DET if heavy with the foot will get a minimum of 430 and a best of 520 with a light cruising foot.

Nice work cubes.

I thought u would have budgeted to get the big snail on there so it could have all gone on their at once.

I dont know how you are getting such good fuel economy there, I am lucky to get anything over 300km to a full tank driving like a granny to work everyday

Yer not sure on the fuel economy, A couple of things I can think of?!?

Accelerating around slowly and boost starts to build I lick the throttle back a little to let the BOV bleed the boost.

RB20 general driving I used to change up at around 3000rpm.

RB30, I change up just over 2000rpm, some times i throw it in a high gear and let the torque lug slowly to the speed limit.

What injectors are you running?

Spray patterns and good atomisation make a noticable difference to economy.

Inasnt,

Its some where in the Settings Inj menu. The ms. Unsure if it states injector correction or not. :rofl:

Out of curiosity I've done a few little calcs.

After looking at the peak power it really is approx 175rwkw which was made from approx 4500rpm to 4950rpm.

The 176rwkw was simply a little peak in the graph, I don't consider it a power figure. If that makes sense. :)

So lets say 4500rpm is where the peak power was made.

RB30DET - 4500rpm to 4950rpm

flows the same air as an

RB20DET - 6775rpm to 7400rpm

My old RB20DET made its peak power figure of 164rwkw (stock ecu but) on 1bar of boost at 7000rpm. I thought 7000rpm was a little high for a stocker so it may have been a dyno operator error. Rev's flick quickly around that point so it may have been 6800rpm or even 6500rpm (more likely)

Either way it gives a general idea on the engine airflow differences between the two motors.

No wonder the turbo drops power after 5000rpm. :(

If this turbo was on the rb25det I would expect it to make its peak power between 5425rpm to 5925rpm.

Has any one got a dyno graph of their RB25 on the stock RB25 turbo, where it makes its peak power or if the graph rounds out slightly?

By RB25 factory specs (6200rpm) I would expect peak power on the 3ltr with the rb25 turbo to be around 5150rpm then maybe round off and possibly hold a figure close to that for another 500rpm or maybe hold an average power figure over 500rpm with the 5150rpm being the in the middle of that distribution.

It would be interesting if this theory were to hold true, and if VCT on the RB25 RB25 head actually extends the peak power figure on the 3ltr, hence improving VE a noticable amount in the top end over the RB25DE N/A Cams.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...