Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I need the following to get a RWC to finally get my car on the road. What are the most likely places to find the suspension gear I need if I cant locate via the forums

Car is 1990 R32 GTST type M , coupe

Full set of front upper wishbone-bushes

Right-Hand inner rack end/inner tie-rod end

Exhaust and rear section

If you can help , please PM or email at [removed by admin at poster's request]

Thanks

Hi guys,

I need the following to get a RWC to finally get my car on the road. What are the most likely places to find the suspension gear I need if I cant locate via the forums

Car is 1990 R32 GTST type M , coupe

Full set of upper wishbone-bushes

Right-Hand inner rack end/inner tie-rod end

Exhaust and rear section

If you can help , please PM or email at [removed by admin at poster's request]

Thanks


www.whiteline.com.au


cheers.gif

hi, regarding the front upper arms -

save yourself the squeaks and just get the factory ones, make sure they're torqued up with the cars weight on the wheels.Most people with aftermarket bushes I know complain about the squeaks. Maybe if whiteline fit them they will be ok, but I know of a guy who has had the suspension guys fit greas nipples so they can lubricate the bushes! - and they are one of the better ones in Brisi.

I got a pair of arms from nissan for $380, a/mkt bushes were going to cost nearly that. I doubt they are any better than the stock ones unless you go to the trouble of the 'better' quality adj. upper arms.

hi Undertoe, I dont think it will effect the upper arms too much although it will transfer the vibrations from the castor rods to the rest of the car which may wear the rubber bushes a bit faster.

It all depends what you want to do with the car, SK goes racing in his so his recommendations are prob the best here to follow if you want to do the same. My car goes out for the occasional trackday where it gets a good workout. I am onto my 3rd set of upper arms, probably could of made the last set last longer but the squeaking got a bit annoying. The first set showed wear by squeaking then developed a clunking sound when the bush was moving around the bolt. Up here in QLD we have some killer curbs, real steep angled ones and not many driveways are ramped - just using the curb as the entry point, this means some extreme suspension movement going in and out of driveways and wears things alot quicker.

What price are you being quoted for the nolathane? the super-pro ones I were quoted on were nearly as dear as the complete arms so I went original. I dont think going nolathane is going to make that much difference as I think the factory ones are some sort of plastic?? anyway.

Hi guys, some clarification;

The standard upper arm bushes are synthetic rubber, which (like natural rubber) has trapped oil bubbles. This means a hardness rating around 50 to 55. The rubber is bonded to both the inner and outer cases. This meandsit doesn't need lubrication as the air bubbles expand and contract to absord roation and deflection, this make then qiet in operation (low NVH). The disadvantage is the air bubbles allow dynamic camber change by compressing and expanding due to load. Since the yare bonded rubber bushes don't allow adjustment.

Polyurethane does not contain air bubbles, so it requires floating bushes (crush tubes) and lubrication to enable it to rotate. The lack of air bubbles means a hardness rating around 90. The big advantage is less deflection under load and more consistent camber (very little dynamic camber change). Since the crush tube floats (its not bonded) there is the ability to adjust via offsetting.

Nolathane is a combination of the words Nolan (the brothers who did a lot of the early work in this field) and Polyurethane, the material used. This brand name was sold by the Nolans several years ago. You can buy Nolathane brand bushes from all sorts of retail outlets, mostly as replacement parts for high volume vehicles (Commondoors and Foulcans).

Noltec www.noltec.com.au is the company now run by Greg Nolan (one of the brothers) and his son David (he races in Improved Production). They have continued developing polyurethane bushes for high performance and race vehicles. They have a number of products for Skylines including sliding adjustable upper arms with polyurethane bushes.

Whiteline www.whiteline.com.au have their own supply of polurethane and have a range of adjustable bushes that are fitted into the standard arms. We use their products a lot on Improved Production race cars as wee are not allowed to replace suspension arms.

Some adjustable arms use spherical joints instead of rubber of polyurethane. They have a hardness of 100. They need lubrication and have very high wear rates, for example on the Super Tourers we replaced $2K worth of sphericals every second race meeting.

When extra caster is added, via adjustable bushes or replacement radius rod with sphericals, extra loading is applied to the control arms (both upper and lower). This accelerates the wear on the bushes which necessitates frequent lubrication and more often replacement.

In summary, as with all performance products there are compromises. The standard rubber allow deflection, the polyurethane requires lubrication and the spericals require. But The standard rubber is quit and basically service free, the polyurethane allows much less dynamic change, has adjustment and so assists handling and the spericals are the easiest to adjust and have the least amount of unwanted deflection. It's your choice.

:(

Hi , thanks for the comprehensive info mate. I was really wanting the cheapest solution at this stage. Was hoping to get some Polyurethane replacement bushes for the standard arms at a good price. They must be available cheaper than the $230 - $380 I have been quoted. I was reading that NZ owners were obtaining them for fair less, also are they sourceable from japan?

Hi , thanks for the comprehensive info mate. I was really wanting the cheapest solution at this stage. Was hoping to get some Polyurethane replacement bushes for the standard arms at a good price. They must be available cheaper than the $230 - $380 I have been quoted. I was reading that NZ owners were obtaining them for fair less, also are they sourceable from japan?

The polyurethane upper control arm bushes themselves are not expensive, but they are a bugger to fit, both time consuming and requiring special tools. Try your local Repco, AutoOne, AutoPro, AutoBarn, SupaCheap for Nolathane brand. I would strongly suggest getting adjustable camber bushes, they don't cost much more and the labour to install them is the same. Being able to adjust camber is a big advantage.

:(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...