Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well i couldnt wait so i installed the bleedvalve not long ago and took the car for a fang. initial impressions are that revs build up alot fast and smoother - dont know how, but most importantly it holds the pressure bloodly well. best $35 ive spent at this stage it beats my profec a ebc which needed to learn boost curves yaada yadaa. but with this one, its just straight on, set and drive. one happy chappy, cheers mark.

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i just installed mine this arvo, went for a thrashing. i noticed when i stepped on the pedal (3rd gear) it pulled from 3'thou rpm to about 7'thou with no signs of boost drops or spikes. i didnt adjust it yet, as it came pre-adjusted and the reading on the boost guage was 0.7bar = 10ish psi?

anyways here a pic of the install as i noticed some people had difficulties determining what went here :unsure:

this bleedvalve is on a sr20 but i dont think it make a difference to what car it is. one line goes to actuator and the other goes to intake pipe.

post-1473-1128420587.jpg

so let me get this straight.....

With this controller you can only INCREASE boost......

The reason im asking is my R32 is running 13psi and this uses more fuel and creates more heat then i would want..... i want to put it on about 10 for the street and raise it for the track.....

Is this possible?

Cant you just use ur right foot to control boost? if u want two different settings i would suggest you get a different setup. Something with a high/low switch or something like that.

lol.. Use your foot, its not like the rb20det is known for its early boost build. :D

For the track you would want it the other way around.

Less boost for the track, more for the street.

Having a higher boost on the street is much much safer and creates much less heat than the lower boost would at the track.

Edited by Cubes

i wouldnt mind a hi low switch but i dont see any going for $35......

I dont mind a minute or so under the bonnet.....

Cubes... sorry to sound blunt but how is this so? higher boost creates less heat?? yet uses more petrol tho?

Keeping on the throttle for long periods of time is what creates high heat; that and poor tuning (retarded ign. timing and lean afrs)

Fit a highlow you will find it a novelty, after a couple of weeks you will leave it on high and use your foot to control boost.

Controlling boost with the right foot is a very easy thing to do, especially with the rb20det as its a little sluggy to make decent boost. i.e 3000-3500rpm and a decent amount of throttle. :D

Edited by Cubes
Keeping on the throttle for long periods of time is what creates high heat; that and poor tuning (retarded ign. timing and lean afrs)

Fit a highlow you will find it a novelty, after a couple of weeks you will leave it on high and use your foot to control boost.

Controlling boost with the right foot is a very easy thing to do, especially with the rb20det as its a little sluggy to make decent boost. i.e 3000-3500rpm and a decent amount of throttle. :)

You mean advanced ign. timing... ;)

Longer burn = more energy produced = more power = more heat !

Retarded ignition timing creates high EGT's and essentially makes everything hotter.

Just did a quick google to provide you with a link.

Improper timing - increase in EGT means retarded ignition, decrease means advanced ignition.

http://www.grumman.net/~n4170n/EGTTroubleshootingTable.html

Edited by Cubes
Retarded ignition timing creates high EGT's and essentially makes everything hotter.

Just did a quick google to provide you with a link.

http://www.grumman.net/~n4170n/EGTTroubleshootingTable.html

Advancing the ign. will have the same effect, primarily on the internal combustion temperatures (a more direct effect than EGT). This is also why advancing your timing too much causes "pinging" (usually combined with lean AFR's).

I'd be less worried about retarded timing than advanced timing... EGT's wouldn't jump by a huge amount (although they would increase, as more fuel would be burning in the exhaust side)... i'd mainly worry about oxygen sensors and cats, which would die quicker as a result of the increased temps. I'd imagine the increase in charge temperature (being that the turbo would get a bit hotter) would be pretty small if you had a decent intercooler!

:(

Just my 2 cents... I see where you are coming from though.

So what is it then?

You would rather what? Tune lean run less ignition timing?

or tune a little richer and run more ignition timing?

I am talking about a whole package, not just playing with ignition timing or just with fuel.

Consider most hipo motors, how they are tuned.

They don't lean the suckers out and run stuff all ignition timing, they tend to run them richer and keep the ignition timing in there, especially around peak torque.

Obviously if you dial in too much fuel you will see egt temps climb due to what is known as afterburn. Its a balancing act, if you really hammer the car around the local track I would definitely consider investing in an egt temp guage. Its the only way to achieve the safest tune.

I should also mention the japs tend to tune a little richer and run a little more ignition timing in their drift cars.

I've done quite a bit of research in to the theory of tuning and feel I have quite a good idea what is going on.

A richer tune that allows a little more ignition timing is a safer tune.

EDIT: ESPECIALLY for ceramic turbine turbo's.

:(

Edited by Cubes

That makes alot of sense Cubes. Will take that into consideration when I get mine tuned. So instead of the usualy 11.8:1 - 12.1:1 AFR people are aiming at, if you have ignition control as well you reckon something like 11.5:1 with advancements in timing is better?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah. Was just wondering if you were having a small stroke or if there was some slur/gaf/inside joke that I wasn't aware of.
    • That was a fark up, it's Salamanca Place I was thinking of. And now I'm curious as to what potential slur/gaf I have caused with Salamander Road, ha ha!
    • Actually everyone on the roads was really well behaved. The only person that did any minor tailgating was a local hoon in a Turbo Focus. Unfortunately we weren't going the same way so there was no grand initial D touge battle. Lots of people pulled over and let me through. The amount of "Hey man nice car, omg skyline, nice 34 man woo" was suprising. Like really suprising. Like almost annoying. My partner was obviously surprised, she'd never seen anyone in the real world point out the car/like the car/want to chat about the car before, so to have like 3 people per day mention it was notable, I could finally say SEE? SOMEONE THINKS THEY'RE COOL. Everyone was also pretty suprised about the weather. Every day was dry and about ~13-14C. Mount Wellington had a sign that said they close the gates at 9pm and I was heading up there at about ~7:30. It was VERY apparent that conditions were getting significantly worse by the minute on the way up and down. The road on the mountain was terrible though, it's no driving road. I have various suspension related questions now. Luckily it was only about 20 minutes from where we were staying to the top of the mountain as said Google maps. We only had the 2 nights in Hobart. We went to the Farm Gate Market though which was really good - And went down to the Hastings Thermal springs/caves down there during the day. I'd definitely be up for going back again, so luckily there's a few more sights yet to see. Didn't get to do the west coast/queenstown/cradle mountain so this was supposed to be a 'scouting' trip anyway of sorts if I were to one day do/take part in/organize a more car-focused trip. As for the boat, it wasn't bad. Well it was bad, but not in the way you're thinking. We did the night trip which leaves at 6:45 (though you have to be there ~2 hours earlier) and arrives the next morning at about 6am. There is nothing to do on the ship. If you plan accordingly and bring a book/tablet/show to watch/charger you can just chill out, take some Travacalm and just sleep through it. The food there is an extremely basic buffet that costs $32 a plate, or $14 for a $3 pizza. The way back we had a travel kettle and a few different types of cup noodles and made our own tea/coffee in the room. This was a far superior way to do it. At the very least book one of the rooms with beds. I guess as we were in the off season we didn't have room mates. You get an option for rooms with 4 beds (2x bunks) or a room with just the two bottom beds. There's also some option for a deluxe queen bed but it's much pricer. We've been on sleeper trains in Asia before so we figured this is similar (and it was)
    • You just gotta be really, really, really clear and decisive with what you want your end product to be. 99% of people who want this conversion aren't "I want to run a 295 front tyre!" so they don't really need the widebody. They just want the OEM body to look a little less dumpy, so bonnet, bar, skirts job done with some camber, stretch, slam. It's when you want that, but then decide to pivot later you get big problems. See also if you're willing to get an all in one fibreglass bar, and you're willing to accept fibreglass problems like cracking the entire item on a driveway, instead of just a piece attached to the bottom, etc etc etc. Decide this all before buyin'.
×
×
  • Create New...