Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dear All,,

I would like your help in finding the correct Bearings for my engine, I had to take my crank to the machine shop and they said they must grind the crank which means I need to put in bigger Size Bearings. I was using NISMO Bearing and it was STD0 RRR40 but the workshop here don’t work with these numbers, so I need your help in :

1. Is it advisable to use the crank after all?

2. How will I know the correct size to use?

The work shop had measured the crank in came up with these figures :

Main Bearing size in STD is 54.98 and they have to grind the crank up to 54.48

Con Rod bearing size in STD is 47.98 and they have to grind the crank up to 47.73

Please help in finding the correct NISMO Bearings

Best Regards

Adel

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/73433-rb26-engine-bearings-help/
Share on other sites

Adel,

Going off the sizes that you have given it's more than likely that the crank has a bend in it. usually, if the crank needs to go .5mm undersize on the main journals it's because when it is set up in the machine running true on #1 and #7 main, #4 is running too far out to clean up at the first undersize. This happens quite often when a conrod bearing spins and the conrod journal gets very hot. It also means that you will end up with some conrod throws having extra stroke, if the mains have to go .5mm undersize, the extra stroke on a few cylinders could be up to almost .5mm which is bad for your engine.

Ask the machine shop if it is bent, or if the crank is already ground, ask them to check the stroke on each conrod throw. If either the crank is bent or the strokes are different on each conrod journal after grinding, throw the crank away and get another, it will save you troubles in the future and make a much nicer engine. you will be able to see if the crank had the bend ground out of it when you assemble it as the pistons will protrude more in the centre cylinders.

The other problem with going that far undersize is that you will be coming pretty close to grinding through the case hardening on the journals or even worse, on part of the journals.

Buying a new crank is the safest and I believe the best solution if you want your engine to last.

Not sure how much extra on top of machining a new crank would cost, but I think its worth it, or you might be back where you started.....another rebuild- its happened to so many of us

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok i will get those 310mm. I found one but on a different site. This is the description on those...is it ok? Technical parameters: - Axle: front. - Disc type: ventilated. - Number of holes: 5. - Disc diameter: 310mm. - Total height with center: 54mm. - Thickness (new/min.): 30/28mm. - Designed for brake calipers manufacturer: Sumitomo.
    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
×
×
  • Create New...