Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

TRACK: Qld Raceway Sprint

GTR Class:

--Dry---,--Wet---

0:56.84, x:xx.xx, R32, Giant

0:58.50, x:xx.xx, R33, maccattack

1:06.24, x:xx.xx, R32, Rob_32_VSPEC

1:06.66, x:xx.xx, R32, ParagOn

x:xx.xx, 1:08.30, R33, jlNewton

x:xx.xx, 1:16.68, R33, Toy33 (new car)

GTS Class:

--Dry---,--Wet---

1:05.23, 1:14.29, R33, SirSkyline

1:06.06, 1:15.41, R32, nf.

1:06.65, x:xx.xx, R33, Toy33 (old car)

1:08.62, x:xx.xx, R33, rhinorebel

1:09.87, 1:16.10, R32, predator

1:11.35, x:xx.xx, R32, slapper

x:xx.xx, 1:20.30, R33, JCMarshall_Law

x:xx.xx, 1:21.99, R33, Mr.R33

EVO Class:

--Dry---,--Wet---

1:01.22, x:xx.xx, EVO 8, EVO Cam

TRACK: Qld Raceway Clubman

GTR Class:

--Dry---,--Wet---

1:01.61, x:xx.xx, R32, giant

1:03.12, x:xx.xx, R33, maccattack

1:07.30, x:xx.xx, R32, Rob_32_VSPEC

1:09.76, x:xx.xx, R32, MountainRunner

1:09.81, x:xx.xx, R34, Willo

1:10.12, x:xx.xx, R32, ParagOn

1:13.94, x:xx.xx, R33, JGB33

x:xx.xx, 1:14.60, R33, jlNewton

x:xx.xx, 1:20.55, R33, Toy33 (new car)

GTS Class:

--Dry---,--Wet---

1:08.94, x:xx.xx, R33, Toy33 (old car)

1:09.09, 1:17.46, R33, SirSkyline

1:10.42, x:xx.xx, R33, jaqule

1:10.46, x:xx.xx, R33, slamm

1:12.09, 1:18.58, R32, nf.

1:12.24, x:xx.xx, R32, gts4diehard

1:12.93, x:xx.xx, R32, $$slowmedown

1:12.97, 1:23.13, R33, JCMarshall_Law

1:14.14, x:xx.xx, R32, slapper

1:18.55, 1:20.66, R31, predator

1:19.76, x:xx.xx, R32, myR32

x:xx.xx, 1:23.76, R33, Mr.R33

EVO Class:

--Dry---,--Wet---

1:02.47, x:xx.xx, EVO 8, EVO Cam

TRACK: Qld Raceway National Circuit

GTR Class:

--Dry---,--Wet---

1:25.60, x:xx.xx, R33, maccattack

1:31.60, x:xx.xx, R32, Rob_32_VSPEC

GTS Class:

--Dry---,--Wet---

1:33.67, x:xx.xx, R33, SirSkyline

1:34.62, x:xx.xx, R33, Toy33 (old car)

1:34.86, x:xx.xx. R32, nf.

EVO Class:

--Dry---,--Wet---

1:25.61, x:xx.xx, EVO 8, EVO Cam

Edited by GTRman1992
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/74076-2005-time-attack-challenge-results/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

damn... maccattack... your times are REALLY very impressive... you've got the baffle plates in yet?

No not yet, still running with the Accusump.

To date I've never lost pressure.

Until something breaks (which knock wood nothing has yet) and I have to take out the engine, I'll leave it the way it is.

I must say that everyones times were pretty good for the day considering the track was still covered in dirt as an aftermath from the Krusty Demons show on Saturday. It was pretty unnerving coming into corners 1 & 2 and seeing dirt and lumps of hardened mud all over thae track. Sort of tends to tighten up the bung hole when you are coming in hard.

It was great to see a number of new people out there.

Great day - Thanks Paul - Look forward to the next one.

EVO Cam, I have added you to the list. I'll do non Skyline cars by request if you like for anyone on this forum.

Thanks maccattack, I look forward to the next one as well (car will be running again by then). Maybe you will let me follow you for a few laps and learn those driving lines !!!

No not yet, still running with the Accusump.

To date I've never lost pressure.

Until something breaks (which knock wood nothing has yet) and I have to take out the engine, I'll leave it the way it is.

I must say that everyones times were pretty good for the day considering the track was still covered in dirt as an aftermath from the Krusty Demons show on Saturday. It was pretty unnerving coming into corners 1 & 2 and seeing dirt and lumps of hardened mud all over thae track. Sort of tends to tighten up the bung hole when you are coming in hard.

It was great to see a number of new people out there.  

Great day - Thanks Paul - Look forward to the next one.

I am pretty keen to meet up sometime and have a look and chat about the accusump setup. I have the trust extension sitting at home but the effort and $$$s in pulling the engine to do it is really killing me. I want to get out there now! Next time you are going to the SAS sprints let me know and I will come out for a look. I really don't think I will ever be able to make a mid week track day, not for a while anyway. Just started a new job. . . Congrates on the times btw.

I am pretty keen to meet up sometime and have a look and chat about the accusump setup.  I have the trust extension sitting at home but the effort and $$$s in pulling the engine to do it is really killing me.  I want to get out there now!  Next time you are going to the SAS sprints let me know and I will come out for a look.  I really don't think I will ever be able to make a mid week track day, not for a while anyway.  Just started a new job. . .   Congrates on the times btw.

No problems. If you wanted to check it out before then, I work in the Newstead area and live around Morningside. PM me if you want to organise a time.

Thanks for your comments.

  • 1 month later...

Great to see you had a good time. It was interesting having the bike groups there as well don't you think ?

I will send out the date of the pizza night shortly, I just have to get organised.

The next date for Aug 30 has 26 reserved spots already, so if you are keen book in.

Paul

Hey Paul,

Thanks for the day (again). Book me in for the August run.

Sorry I had to cut it short but I ended up cracking both front rotors.

Gone for the 5000 series, so all should be good for a while.

Cheers

Peter

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...