Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Make - NISSAN

Model - SKYLINE GTR

Year - 1993

Series - R32

Shape - 2 DOOR

Kms - 96,XXX KMS

Rego - ANU-35L

Colour - SILVER

Transmission - 5 SPEED MANUAL

Location - NEAR NEWCASTLE

Price - $28,000 O.N.O.

Options, Modifications and other Comments -

This car is in fantastic condition mainly only driven on the weekend. The oil and filter have been changed every 5,000 kms with castrol formula r oil and has only been run on 98 octane fuel ever since I have owned it.

The modifications are as follows:-

18inch rims (Shadow chrome deep dish) 255/35/18

Apexi Power Fc + Hand Controller

Apexi AVC-R Boost Controller

V-spec suspension

Cold Air intake

Custom made single plate clutch with custom pressure plate

Cd Player

Nismo Gear Knob

Oil Filter relocation kit

HKS Turbo timer

Cryogenically treated and modified gearbox

Twin HKS Sequential Blow Off Valves

Aftermarket tuned length front pipes

High flow cat

Hks 80mm exhaust with x force 3.5in muffler

N1 VENTS

Hella high mount LED brake light

NSW REGO TILL FEB 06

$28000 NEG

CALL DAVID ON (02)49191218 or 0402290349 Or E-MAIL at [email protected] or PM ME

1993_GTR_1.jpg

1993_GTR_2.jpg

1993_GTR_3.jpg

1993_GTR_4.jpg

1993_GTR_5.jpg

1993_GTR_6.jpg

1993_GTR_7.jpg

1993_GTR_8.jpg

Guest DIRTgarage
How much boost is it running and what sort of power figures?

Looks like a very tidy example and a good price. Gl with the sale mate.

This car was a trophy winner at SAU dyno day at Unique Autosports...highest powered standard turbo GTR 284rwkw at 1.1bar. This power figure was obtained using a base map power FC, avc-r and a catback exhaust on pump gas....nothing more! The potential for 300rwkw+ would easily be obtained by a custom tune and some cam gears/timing.

see attached dyno sheet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...