Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If You Guys Can Give Me A Rough Idea Of What This Should Make On A Rb25det

Mods Include

Gt35r .82 Exhaust Housing

High Mount Exhaust Manifold

Tial Wastegate

Forward Facing Inlet Xf Throttle Body

750cc Injectors

Tomei Poncams

Tomei Headgasket

Haltec Computer

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/81859-what-sort-of-power-should-this-make/
Share on other sites

I know this isnt answering ya question but make sure u can use a XF tps with ya ecu. PowerFCs cant. I found out the hard way :D

i'll be trying to modify the standard tps somehow first.

if that can't be done i'll grab a haltec one and rig that up

If You Guys Can Give Me A Rough Idea Of What This Should Make On A Rb25det

Mods Include

Gt35r .82 Exhaust Housing

High Mount Exhaust Manifold

Tial Wastegate

Forward Facing Inlet Xf Throttle Body

750cc Injectors

Tomei Poncams

Tomei Headgasket

Haltec Computer

Have you got forgies to go with alll that stress

Some like to run leaner with less ignition timing and some richer with more ignition timing. But generally they end up making roughly the same power.

Personally I like the richer with more ignition timing method.

A tune should consist of fiddling with cam centerlines and combine that with the fuel and ignition setup. I could then see a 50rwkw difference.

Apart from that I doubt it would vary by anymore than 20rwkw or so by only tuning via the ign. and fuel maps.

That is providing the tuner isn't completely stupid and pulls shiet loads of ignition timing out.

This is dangerous in its self as less ignition timing = a higher EGT.

Exactly why I like the richer and more ignition timing. Lower EGT.

i was after more towards a HP rating as thats given by what wheels are used.

i dont think they run anything but a .7comp

well im pretty sure gcg quote them at 700hp

but people argue anwhere from 650-700 if thats what you were after

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Consider a 35 too...
    • He's right ~ there is no 'magic' with stuff like this ... it is more likely that in the process of looking for the short, the loom/wire 'incidentally' got moved in the process, thus removing the short ~ now, that maybe a wire (in a loom) rubbing against the edge of some grounded metal, that's worn through the insulation, causing the (now intermittent) short to ground. If one wire in a loom has been damaged in this fashion, it's reasonable to presume that other wires beside it may have also be damaged, and now exposed...you can bet the green crusty copper corrosion will start... ...that'd be a pisser, Murphy's Law steps right in as GTS observes...but worse, something like that is easier to find when shorted...ie; unplug bulb and fuse, and put multimeter in continuity mode so you get constant beep, and carefully poke about hoping to find if some movemet of the harness stop the beeping.... ...it's still all a bit Arnie tho' ..It'll be back... 😃
    • Yeah, but knowledge of one wire's insulation worn through to short on earth implies the possibility of other wires doing the same. I had my power steering die, because the wire that runs to the solenoid valve on the rack runs in the same loom as the power wire for the O2 sensor. And when the O2 sensor/wire did something stupid and burnt part of that loom to death, the only indication was the shit(ter) fuel economy and the heavy steering. It took deep excavation of the looms in the bay to find the problem. Not wear through in that case, but similar shit.
    • Ah, I thought he'd wired it to one of the spare ECU inputs! Too long ago since I read that post, ha ha. I've been arguing with radiators, harmonic balancers, alternators and rust since reading it.
    • Correct. The ECU cannot read oil temp. (Well, I think it probably can in some situations. I did have the thought of potentially repinning the ECU when I was doing oil pressure). I am using this into the MPVI dongle, so that the MPVI dongle can read oil temperature. It is attached to a VDO gauge which is obviously calibrated to whatever curve the sender actually is using. This would be easy if I could setup a table of voltage to temperature like many sensors, but it appears I cannot do this and can only setup the transform rule which appears to be Input (voltage) x Multiplier, and add an offset. This to me means it MUST be linear. So it may be a complete waste of time wiring this into the ECU. The idea was that the MPVI3 has standalone logging. I wanted to use this instead of a laptop with serial cable (for wideband) for long datalogs. Given the wideband also has electric interference, I may never trust this either in a world where the serial wideband and the analog output wideband do not agree. Last time I did a trace I could see the two wideband traces follow each other, but one was a little leaner than the other. I plan on playing with voltage offsets and actually driving the thing to see how close they correlate. If they never correlate... then, well, maybe I'll never use either. Ideally I'd like to have the Analog wideband read ever so slightly leaner than the serial one, because the serial one is 'correct'. Tuning the car to be ever so slightly too-rich would be the aim. Not needing to have a laptop flying around in the footwell connected with cables is... an advantage. About the only one from the forced upgrade to MPVI3.
×
×
  • Create New...