Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

P7290222.jpgP7290224.jpgP7290225.jpg

With only 64,000kms on the clock, which judging by the amounts of physical wear, or more to the point lack of, on interior components this freshly complied vehicle still retains the new car smell, despite its age. It is an absolute pleasure to drive, the engine is responsive and the suspension/diff combination make to a very nibble and predictable vehicle.

Following is the list of modifications: Tein height and damper adjustable suspension, Unknown brand 2-way mechanical diff, 3" mandrel bent (dump pipe back) exhaust, an aggressive aftermarket clutch and suspected flywheel package, 17” R34 GT-t mags (on vehicle), Cusco oil catch can.

Also comes with a set of mismatched rims, front are 17” and rear 16”

In a nutshell this is an extremely honest vehicle. What you see is exactly what you get. It has the potential as a reliable daily driver or a perfect base to build a formidable track, drift or street car. For more information and pictures please head over to http://www.kudosmotorsports.com/r32.htm

The fantastic looking vehicle is up for sale. It's freshly complied and awaiting its first registered Australian owner.

Asking Price: $13,000 which includes QLD RWC

Contact Details:

E-mail: [email protected]

Phone: 0401417772

For all details & pictures please head over here.

Hi Jaime,

The car was purchased from a supplier therefore there was no auction sheet. As you can see from the photos the car, in general, is in good condition. The interior is the best I have seen. The only major flaw is the front guards which are a little rough. The majority of this damage comes from some dodgy Japanese guard rolling, or should I say prying. The passenger isn’t anything to really worry about but the driver looks to have received a small knock and would be better of being replaced. If the vehicle sales for the asking price we will be able to working something out.

Unfortunately I am not looking for a trade in vehicle.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSP male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSP reducing bush?
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
×
×
  • Create New...