Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

P7290222.jpgP7290224.jpgP7290225.jpg

With only 64,000kms on the clock, which judging by the amounts of physical wear, or more to the point lack of, on interior components this freshly complied vehicle still retains the new car smell, despite its age. It is an absolute pleasure to drive, the engine is responsive and the suspension/diff combination make to a very nibble and predictable vehicle.

Following is the list of modifications: Tein height and damper adjustable suspension, Unknown brand 2-way mechanical diff, 3" mandrel bent (dump pipe back) exhaust, an aggressive aftermarket clutch and suspected flywheel package, 17” R34 GT-t mags (on vehicle), Cusco oil catch can.

Also comes with a set of mismatched rims, front are 17” and rear 16”

In a nutshell this is an extremely honest vehicle. What you see is exactly what you get. It has the potential as a reliable daily driver or a perfect base to build a formidable track, drift or street car. For more information and pictures please head over to http://www.kudosmotorsports.com/r32.htm

The fantastic looking vehicle is up for sale. It's freshly complied and awaiting its first registered Australian owner.

Asking Price: $13,000 which includes QLD RWC

Contact Details:

E-mail: [email protected]

Phone: 0401417772

For all details & pictures please head over here.

Hi Jaime,

The car was purchased from a supplier therefore there was no auction sheet. As you can see from the photos the car, in general, is in good condition. The interior is the best I have seen. The only major flaw is the front guards which are a little rough. The majority of this damage comes from some dodgy Japanese guard rolling, or should I say prying. The passenger isn’t anything to really worry about but the driver looks to have received a small knock and would be better of being replaced. If the vehicle sales for the asking price we will be able to working something out.

Unfortunately I am not looking for a trade in vehicle.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...