Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

As the rather long subject line says, looking to sell my current Apexi Power FC, with it's current AFM setup, also included is the Hand controller and the FC Datalogit with is a more advanced version of the mapping and tuning software for the Apexi ECU's.

Looking for AUD $ 1400 all up and I'll cover postage to Australia or anywhere in NZ.

Can't split the 2 x Z32's from the deal unless you're happy to wait until I've got rid of the ECU and the person who buys the ECU doesn't want them. They'll get first offer, but can happily hold them if you're willing to wait and see.

FC Datalogit is $ 400 USD on it's own if you buy one seperately from their website. You'll save the cost just in tuning time on a dyno. Without an FC Datalogit you'll have to use a hand controller and that will take hours and you probably won't get as good a result.

Reason for sale, I'm building a new motor and the power FC won't really do what I want. Has worked faultlessly up till now. If you've got a factory motor and turbos, this kit will bolt up and probably will only need an hour on the dyno to see you making nearly 290-300KW at all 4.

Edited by canman
ill take an afm if you decide to seperate

I've already got someone who's willing to take both AFM's if someone purchases the rest and doesn't want the AFM's.

Come on people.........willing to seriously consider sensible offers.

  • 2 weeks later...
Pity it wasn't for a R32, you would have a sale  :rant:

Regards

Andrew

Yeah it is a shame that the ECU's won't work across the different cars.

Datalogit works on all RB 26's but because the ECU is involved in more than just engine I believe it's a no go, unless someone else knows otherwise.

I think it's a great deal, moneywise, just not many 34 GTR owners around to buy.

Anyone please tell me if you think it's just the price rather than level of buyers that's stopping this from selling.

Hi Fraser, I think it's the fact that there aren't many 34GTR's here.

Would you consider selling the FC-Datalogit seperately?

Would only be willing to seperate if the purchaser of the ECU didn't want it.

Think I have a buyer for the lot now though......

I'll post back either way.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...