Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

RiData (same with RiMedia) is a sub-company of RiTek. They are lower quality than genuine Ritek G04/G05.

I was at the markets today and asked a guy what the best quality media was that he had, he pointed at genuine RitekG05's. I laughed and asked for something better, he handed me a 50pk of Princo's, I laughed again. Than 5mins later when I was just about to leave he says "Oh you could try out these OEM TDK TY02's" haha finally he pulls out something decent...

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Wow ! So many differing opinions. I have always used genuine Ritek media, reported by Alcohol 120% as RITEKG05. I have not had a failure in over 600 burns. As someone else mentioned they rock with game consoles.

Hippy has a very valid point: hardware is the key factor. I also have a Pioneer unit (DVR108). I choose Ritek G05 media because Pioneer recommend it, which means they test & develop with Ritek media. As a bonus the Pioneer will burn 8x rated Riteks at 12x with factory firmware. I have never had an issue duplicating any DVDR using UltraISO to make an image then burning the .ISO with Nero/Alcohol/DVDDecrypter.

So... use the discs the hardware manufacturer recommends. The best media is the one they test & develop with.

Riteks cost me $23 per 50 from MSY. I always use -R for max compatibility with all devices.

M'kay ?

My brother-inlaw has been complaining the last week about his audio cd's jumping in his new CD Player in his work vehicle. I suggested it was probably just a dodgy CD Player until I realised he was using Ritek CD-R 80min/700mb CD's and burning with a Pioneer DVR106.

So we did a CRC check in Nero CD/DVD Speed to find that more than 65% of the CD was damaged.

Whilst I certainly agree that hardware plays a big part in this i'd put money on it that the quality control team at Ritek must have gone on holidays all at once over the past 6mths or so.

im never going back to riteks cause they suck arse!

cheap yum cha brand DVDs.

Ive used 4 different burners now and all of them burn fine not a problem... but they can NEVER be copied again because of all the errors every program i use picks up.

3 different brand burners and one burner in a brand new MAC laptop.

im definately enjoying the TDK DVDs tho... never going back to yum cha... all those hundreds of DVDs i have now are useless because i cant copy them again.

Just tested a Princo 4 x -R and came back with an error

Tried to copy it with clone dvd from the burnt disc 2 the new princo 4x -r and it wouldnt go..

Nero didnt like it much at all..

Arghhh..

Getting some TDKs, Ritek and Princos in within the next week so Im going to test them all on a Pioneer drive, LG drive, Samsung drive and Toshiba Laptop drive.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...