Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Good idea.

*50 to 125Hp 'Wet' system is the best (fuel and nitrous are added through the kit).

* you need to ensure your existing fuel pump can supply the addtional fuel the extra horsepower will require. Replace the stock pump with a larger bosch unit.

* Do not exeed the 'horsepower' limits of your engine's components by adding too much nitrous or turbo or anything that adds horsepower. This is the sole cause for people dismissing the reliabilllity of nitrous. People need to know when to say 'enough'. Just cause your engine doesn't explode at 100HP jetting doesn't mean you should run 200HP jets just to go faster.

The 'EFI' kits offered by NOS, Nitrous Express and OZNOS/RACE are suitable and probably a 50 or 75HP shot will be plenty without any dramas.

Some time ago when I inquired with NOS about a kit for a stockish R33 GTST. They recomended the EFI kit, plumbed in before the throttle body, and said that it would conservatively be able to net an improvement of 1 to 1.5sec off the standard 1/4 time of 14.2 at a setting of 75HP on street rubber.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8294-anyone-got-nos/#findComment-119896
Share on other sites

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by rev210

Good idea.

*50 to 125Hp 'Wet' system is the best (fuel and nitrous are added through the kit).

* you need to ensure your existing fuel pump can supply the addtional fuel the extra horsepower will require. Replace the stock pump with a larger bosch unit.

* Do not exeed the 'horsepower' limits of your engine's components by adding too much nitrous or turbo or anything that adds horsepower. This is the sole cause for people dismissing the reliabilllity of nitrous. People need to know when to say 'enough'. Just cause your engine doesn't explode at 100HP jetting doesn't mean you should run 200HP jets just to go faster.

The 'EFI' kits offered by NOS, Nitrous Express and OZNOS/RACE are suitable and probably a 50 or 75HP shot will be plenty without any dramas.

Some time ago when I inquired with NOS about a kit for a stockish R33 GTST. They recomended the EFI kit, plumbed in before the throttle body, and said that it would conservatively be able to net an improvement of 1 to 1.5sec off the standard 1/4 time of 14.2 at a setting of 75HP on street rubber.

how much was the NOS kit youlooked at?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8294-anyone-got-nos/#findComment-119943
Share on other sites

Originally posted by INASNT

how much was the NOS kit youlooked at?

They are all upwards of $1500AUS installed. NOS and NX are closer to $2000 installed. You can spend more to give the system more response by adding a purge kit and bottle warmer (pressure controlled is best).

The OZrace EFI kits don't include the bottle (they have a rental deal or you can buy a bottle)

They are around $1000 for the kit minus bottle.

http://www.ozrace.com/ozrace.html

With nitrous kits its good to shop around, mainly with V8 focused shops (they do nitrous kit installs in their sleep).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8294-anyone-got-nos/#findComment-119951
Share on other sites

Originally posted by INASNT

I looked into getting a Nos kit for my worked 250CI Cortina a few years back. You wouldnt need the purge system or bottle warmer unless you were running a shi*tload of NOS and had a highly worked engine.

The blanket is a great idea when its a cool day, the pressure drops and reduces the power delivered. The nozzles rated in HP are HP at a certain mean temperature and atmospheric pressure. Also as the bottle empties the pressure falls off, making the blanket a handy idea.

The purge valve allows the lines to be purged, providing a solid 'hit' of the gas as soon as its on. Without the purge kit there is a 'softness' by comparision.

How worked your engine is doesn't effect the purchase of either of these items, neither does the size of the nitrous hit. A sh*tload of nitrous for a mini is 50HP and it would benifit with these additional items.

Don't just take my word for it ask the companies who produce the kits. :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8294-anyone-got-nos/#findComment-120058
Share on other sites

I think that NOS should be used sparingly, and 50-75hp shots are probably quite safe for most usage. The wet system is definately the better way to go, but at $2000 for a kit I think the turbo should come first.

Where in the rev range should you use the NOS? I know it can be used in an anti-lag effect for getting good launches at the drags, but in general street use what is the best approach.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8294-anyone-got-nos/#findComment-120136
Share on other sites

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

I think that NOS should be used sparingly, and 50-75hp shots are probably quite safe for most usage. The wet system is definately the better way to go, but at $2000 for a kit I think the turbo should come first.

Where in the rev range should you use the NOS? I know it can be used in an anti-lag effect for getting good launches at the drags, but in general street use what is the best approach.

See'ya:burnout:

You use nitrous at wide open throttle (there is a switch under the potato masher).

With nitrous you will shift the peak redline down 500-1000rpm, you will have a very large increase in Torque. What wins races? Torque wins races.

A sub $2000 nitrous system will improve your cars accelleration more than a $2000 turbo setup, the benifits of nitrous read more than the HP jet rating. For one thing you don't require the bigger injectors / aftermarket ecu / blah blah that a largere turbo requires. You retain good fuel economy and the engine will suffer less wear on a regular basis, oh and theres that torque thing too.

The con for the nitrous kit is in WA and Qld it is illegal.:(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8294-anyone-got-nos/#findComment-120205
Share on other sites

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

A mate of mine got his REX through the pits with a wet NOS system, just covered the lines with blue hosing.

See'ya:burnout:

I've seen a few cheaters in WA. Mounted in the (fake) subwoofer box etc.

The lines can be run underneath manifolds and intake parts with a bit of a fiddle and using good old polution hose is a common disguise.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8294-anyone-got-nos/#findComment-120227
Share on other sites

thanks for the responses guys..... i initially posted the question because I wanted to get a feel for what peoples experiences are with NOS.

My car is currently running 0.8 bar with dump and free flow exhaust. I've also got a SAFC. Normally the next logical step would be to install an FMIC but here is where i have the dilemma. I've seen cars with a similar setup with FMIC and they tend to run 13.7-13.9 quarters. If what Rev210 says is true then if I install NOS and get a 1s improvement then I'll be estatic!!

the last time i was at the drags (without aftermarket dumps and cat) the best i could muster was 14.1. If i can get low 13s then i'll be over the moon :uh-huh:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8294-anyone-got-nos/#findComment-120561
Share on other sites

NOS would be win you some coolness points in here for sure, and prolly amongst your friends but whether its really worth it or practical is another question.

Mounting a big intercooler will increase your lag.. but there are other less ways around that other than using NOS!

There is a lot of other things u can do that will be cheaper and probably get you a quicker time - maybe even a second off. Not everything is HP. Changing your tyres and or modifying the ass end (through bushes and the like) will give u better traction and hence better launches. And that will give u everyday better launches on the street as well. Many people have found the same and its one thing i want to do to my car soonish - have a look at meggala's site for the difference it made to his 1/4 time.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8294-anyone-got-nos/#findComment-120564
Share on other sites

I agree with ed.

NOS should be a last resort/last modification. It is designed primarily for drag racing on the strip (in automotive circles), not on the road.

There is a $10,000 fine for using it on the road.

That said, I had a Nitrous'ed Proton Satria GTi, which got the occasional squirt on the roads (but 90% of it's use was on the track)...

I have just purchased a 100hp NOS Wet Kit for my R33 GTS-t, but my car is heavily modified and this NOS kit will just be used on the drag strip.

I'll take photos of it in a minute :thumbsup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8294-anyone-got-nos/#findComment-120565
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...