Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Standard internal Rb20 2 litre that is r32 spec , with a high flow vg30 turbo truck core front mount dump pipe. Some 'mines' ecu a few little mods pod etc, blitz boost controller 290 at the wheels.

I have hit some type of cut, Speed signal cut is the theory at the moment. the dyno graph was heading up still when the power was cut on me. This is on 18 psi. This was at barry's dyno, this arvo.

Enjoy :shake:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8331-290-at-the-tred/
Share on other sites

Guest KILLER-T

Hey this might sound like a stupid question but at what speed did u make peak power.I'm only asking because i had my car on the same dyno yesterday and the peak power and kmh dont add up

By the way top effort with your power output you have to be happy with 290rwhp well done:uh-huh:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8331-290-at-the-tred/#findComment-120468
Share on other sites

Guest KILLER-T

Ok it made 304rwhp and 1650 lb torque running 1.08 bar i still didnt get to see my car running 1.25 bar i cant work out why it dont boost as hard on the dyno it must have something to do with load on the engine anyway he didnt do a tune we just put it on the dyno to see how it was running. Barry said he would like to pull a bit of fuel out of the fuel map and then i will see a bit more POWER i will go back in a few weeks once i have some more cash

:thumbsup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8331-290-at-the-tred/#findComment-120488
Share on other sites

yeah nice power there guys, specially from the RB20 :thumbsup:

a quick question.. FRIGGIN FOOT-POUNDS for torque.. WTF, i dont get it.. is it a straight forward linear conversion like HP-KW or is it logorithmic?

the reason i ask is on the aston martin website (checking out the vanquish after watching bond last night :mad: ) it says the car has 400ft/lb = 541NM..

linear, that would give your car ~2200NM, where'as a LS1 is only 500NM or so.. i dont get it..

someone care to explain?

Shaun

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8331-290-at-the-tred/#findComment-120734
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...