Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

tdawg - did you import a R34? and did your RAWS follow your request?

I ask coz I've started calling RAWS in Qld who are R34 plate holders and I mentioned this request to them and they said

'No, can't be done. Have to be cut and disposed of. Pics then have to be taken to prove the xenon unit has been removed and evidence given of where the unit was disposed/destroyed. Car can't be complied otherwise.'

I have only called 2 of the 10 RAWS in Qld that compliance R34's, maybe one of the remaining 8 RAWS will do it. If they're legit and want to keep their business running I guess they'll cut the xenon units out. If they're a bit dodge and follow a customers request well they must have a back up plan when compliance gets turned down.

I have called 8 of the 10 compliance workshops (in Qld) and all of them have said the same thing. They will not comply with that request. If they are a legit business what difference would it make if I was a real (or pretend) inspector or an everyday private buyer?

What are the odds of 8 out of 10 RAWS holding back any possible oversight in the compliance process?

If the government has made it so the xenon units in the R34's are to be removed to meet ADR's then workshops are to comply or run the risk of being investigated and either lose the right to comply R34's or be closed down.

I wholly don't agree with the removal and prove of destroyed/disposed xenons either.

Things like this I'd keep to myself.

Edited by svd164

"If they're a bit dodge and follow a customers request well they must have a back up plan when compliance gets turned down."

Well this statement asnwers it self as to why the new scheme was introduced so if you want an R34 you will do as they say since they dont want to lose thier bussines over a set of head lights.

They dont comply due to the leveling device fitted.

I wouldnt do it if it came to me.

Where does it say anywhere that the wire has to be cut? When cutting it is not required for a halogen conversion?

The wire is part of the headlight unit and not part of the HID unit itself.

That’s like saying a RAWS workshop could lose their licence for leaving some of the wire in place after cutting it because it was meant to be fully destroyed.

Totally ridiculous!

Edited by tdawg

I too am about to face the same dilema in a few days....with my 34

The only thing i can think of is to take out the ballast and igniter and the globes (i think that is right) before it gets to the compliance workshop....

Now the only problem is that some compliance workshops are really following every letter to the T so they will ask you what happened to the missing stuff....to which I believe you are supposed to shrug your shoulders and act ignorant.

Anyone got some solutions to this issue?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok i will get those 310mm. I found one but on a different site. This is the description on those...is it ok? Technical parameters: - Axle: front. - Disc type: ventilated. - Number of holes: 5. - Disc diameter: 310mm. - Total height with center: 54mm. - Thickness (new/min.): 30/28mm. - Designed for brake calipers manufacturer: Sumitomo.
    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
×
×
  • Create New...