Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • GTS-t VSPEC

    20904

  • Nizmo

    13582

  • SHUTO-BOY

    6636

  • skyzerr33

    5353

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Ken,

We shouldn't be so mean, but I do think Joe should proof read some of his posts, they make no sense.

See'ya:burnout:

I think he is a bit like me. Watch's the keyboard as he types.

Difference is , I actually go back and edit what I post if it's wrong.

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Ken,

We shouldn't be so mean, but I do think Joe should proof read some of his posts, they make no sense.

See'ya:burnout:

hahah nah I dotn mind... I know I should check.. I do some times but some times I cant be bothered to do so...:)

arrhhh well I am not hoping to be a english teacher anyway so you all can suck my balls :D

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Ken,

I had the negative camber dialled out for the drags, should I put it back on for the track?

See'ya:burnout:

Absolutely.

The dedicated Solo 1 cars ( which is the enlargened American version of what MC is ) run a reasonable bit on the front to aid on turn in. Can be VERY dodgy at high speed cos it wants to tramline.

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by Pva_Glue

hahah nah I dotn mind... I know I should check.. I do some times but some times I cant be bothered to do so...:)

arrhhh well I am not hoping to be a english teacher anyway so you all can suck my balls :D

:shake: my ass

Cheers

Ken:D

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Tempting offer Joe, but you balls might get stuck between my teeth:p

The storm is getting better:D

See'ya:burnout:

Not to mention you might mistake the snag for a weiner or c o c k tail frank. Hehehe

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Ken,

Most of the negative camber was on the rear, it handled corners much better than it does now. Only problem was the tyre wear.

See'ya:burnout:

Yep , ya can't have one without losing the other.

Not many set up track style cars I know worry about the tyre wear.

They are only interested in Lateral G's ( ie grip )

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Joe,

If I could suck my own then why would I bother leaving home?:D

See'ya:burnout:

I agree , you could make your weird movies in the comfort of your own bedroom.:)

Cheers

Ken

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • FWIW, I've aerated oil, and cams snapped. You can figure out the rest 🥲
    • Depending on the hose, sometimes engine out is the easiest option  
    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
×
×
  • Create New...