Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • GTS-t VSPEC

    20904

  • Nizmo

    13582

  • SHUTO-BOY

    6636

  • skyzerr33

    5353

Originally posted by darK

cya joe..

ken, cant i go under my mums name? shes a rating 1

Don't know , check with your mums insurance company.

Anyone under 25 over here gets bent over by the companies.

Cheers

over 25

Ken

Originally posted by gtrken

Don't know , check with your mums insurance company.

Anyone under 25 over here gets bent over by the companies.

Cheers

over 25

Ken

will i have any chance of importing a late model chaser? not an old one.. but at least 93 and after

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Ken,

It is possible, 3 entries last year did it, but we'll see what we get given, then make decisions:D

Joe, Night mate, are you coming tommorow?

See'ya:burnout:

OK , so who has stuck there hand up.

I assume you and me and who else.

GTRNIK ?

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by darK

will i have any chance of importing a late model chaser? not an old one.. but at least 93 and after

If someone is doing Compliance , yes you can import one.

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Ken,

We have lots of interest:D

Me, You, Killer-T, GT NIK, Caminperth, Zanda, Adrian, R33 Impul, NO RSPECT, Judged, plus  a few others.

So depending on how many spots we get we may or may not need to limit numbers.

See'ya:burnout:

Apart from mine , aren't they all 33's ?

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by darK

ken..

this was written after the specs of the Chaser Mk V (97 model)

Dark , modified ones are out atm.

If a compliance ( read RAWS w/shop ) applies and does all the paperwork for a 93 or so chaser then I would saay you will.

Trouble is that is going to cost around $20+K to do it.

You have to work out if there is enough profit to warrant doing it ( ie are they going to sell enough to get there money back ).

This is why 92-94 GTR's may be defunct cos atm , no one is bothering to comply them

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Ken,

Yes, that's why I'm trying to get people like EVL R33 and the black R34 GTR interested.

Although NIK's doesn't look like a GTS-t:D

See'ya:burnout:

NIKS doesn't even look like a GTR .

It is WAAAAY wilder than that:D :alien:

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by darK

hey.. u know how P Platers have a 125kw/per tonne limit..

mitsubishi fto

6A12 G MIVEC Engine – 168kw/tonne

6A12 G DOHC – 145kw/tonne

Not in Good Ole WA

Cheers

Ken

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...