Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thought that I recognised some of the work on the car.

Ben did a fair bit of work on my engine to get it to a very satisfying point. All my other work was done by Ice Performance except the buggy fuel system which was done by Speed Technology and the Autronic installation which was done at Amberley before Ice Performance took over the job of building me an animal car :P

PA080034.JPG

Originally posted by BIGPSI

ATS in Tullamarine did all the work and the team over there are very helpful and the quality of work is good.  The motor was built by Ben at Race Pace in Bayswater which I am wrapped with.  It is very strong. (Money well spent!)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9040-hi/page/2/#findComment-135144
Share on other sites

No Hi-jacking of threads here mate :P

Not sure bout all 4's. Now that we dyno at Racepace, I only get to see Rwkw.

But at last check which was back in July,I recorded 360 Rwkw at 18psi.

MyRBDETT31-07-02.JPG

Now that I've got a couple more toys in there, I should be able to utilise more of my hairdryer and run some real boost.

I'll give you a final dyno figure in the next couple months when we sort some things out.

Originally posted by ex-static

Sorry to hi-jack.. but leewah how much are you making at all 4 wheels?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9040-hi/page/2/#findComment-135181
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Leewah

No Hi-jacking of threads here mate :P

Not sure bout all 4's.  Now that we dyno at Racepace, I only get to see Rwkw.

But at last check which was back in July,I recorded 360 Rwkw at 18psi.

:drooling: :drooling: :drooling:

How much further are you gonna boost it??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9040-hi/page/2/#findComment-135209
Share on other sites

I figure the engine will be good for about another 7-9 psi but I'm gonna make sure that everything is running perfectly before I do real boosting.

Anyways, this is BIGPSI's thread. Enough bout me. Soz bout the hijack....

Originally posted by riggaP

:drooling: :drooling: :drooling: 

How much further are you gonna boost it??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9040-hi/page/2/#findComment-135236
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...