Jump to content
SAU Community

Field Torque Split Controller

mazgtr

By mazgtr,
in R Series (R30, R31, R32, R33, R34)

 Share

Recommended Posts

mazgtr Community Regular

mazgtr

Posted
Posted

Ive just bought a Field Torque Split Controller for my R32 GTR, but the instructions i recieved for installing it is entirely in Japanese!!!

Does anyone know of a set of English instructions for this item, or has anyone fitted one of these to thier R32 GTR?

I know its a long shot, but i thought id try.

Next step is to hang out at my local Sumo Wrestleing club and try and befriend someone Japanese to translate!! lol!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90671-field-torque-split-controller/
Share on other sites
mazgtr Community Regular

mazgtr

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I ordered mine from http://www.greenline.jp/

I think the Australian agent is Jason, fairly easy, no complaints.

Just get him to confirm the price, delivery, insurance and fee's first...

Ill have to get someone who can read Japanese to translate the instructions for me. The only thing i need translated is the colour of the wire that goes into the attessa loom. Theres about 6 different coloured wires, that need to be spliced into the loom, but i cant read Jap so buggered if i know which colour goes to which point!! LOL!!

Duncan Grand Master

Duncan

Posted
Posted

Sure can check out this link http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...topic=69301&hl=

$350, locally made and supported, and engrish instructions.

I am not familiar with the Field controllers but the ones I can get are different to the HKS controllers which use a fixed torque split (not much use except for drag racing). The ones I can get make the standard system more sensitive but dont force it to have front torque all the time, only when you need it

mazgtr Community Regular

mazgtr

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thats basically the same as the Field device, it simply lets you adjust the stock ATTESSA system to your likeing.

Several owners of GTR's that do track work reccomended them to me, both here and in the USA. But unfortunatley the manufactorers didnt deem it neccesary to have both Jap and Engrish instructions...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • sinn3r
      R34 Skyline climate control unit transistor

      By sinn3r · Posted

      Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • Kinkstaah
      Blue slip

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • GTSBoy
      Best place to order Authetic R32 Parts in Japan

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • GTSBoy
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • GTSBoy
      Blue slip

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...