Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i wouldnt think so, maintence would be similar... usual service etc. if something broke and needed replacing you would have to wait longer for parts. if your lucky might have stock at SOME places. but in general mechanics and parts places dont have any jap parts.

so owning the r34 would have to wait on parts i think more. even though the s15 you proberly still have to wait. but that is a price i would be willing to pay to own the r34.

being well off? i think it will be easier to get finance, insurance etc on s15. but also. wouldnt be massive differnce

i wouldnt think so, maintence would be similar... usual service etc. if something broke and needed replacing you would have to wait longer for parts. if your lucky might have stock at SOME places. but in general mechanics and parts places dont have any jap parts.

so owning the r34 would have to wait on parts i think more. even though the s15 you proberly still have to wait. but that is a price i would be willing to pay to own the r34.

being well off? i think it will be easier to get finance, insurance etc on s15. but also. wouldnt be massive differnce

i just got an S15, it is cheaper in all aspects... No 100k timing belt change. way way cheaper on petrol, small rims and tyres and still looks good, insurance is cheaper then a 34 because its a 4cyl turbo.

All cars would need a 100k timing belt nonetheless...

Doesn't mean buying S15 there is no 100k timing belt change...

It all depends how much km is on the car when you purchased it, both R34 & S15 are roughly from the same era, the S15 probably about 2 years younger by average but I've seen some S15 with higher kms than an older R34...

i just got an S15, it is cheaper in all aspects... No 100k timing belt change. way way cheaper on petrol, small rims and tyres and still looks good, insurance is cheaper then a 34 because its a 4cyl turbo.

Insurance might be cheaper but that again all depends on the market price or agreed value that you come up with your insurer. Currently the market price for a newer S15 probably similar with an older R34 GT-T (GT-R is another story).

Also if things break, with 4-cyl you'll only have 4 pistons to fix, 4 injectors to fix, 4 coil packs, 4 plugs.... all these parts win over R34 by 2 each. Also you might be able to get parts from a locally delivered S15 from Nissan, some parts are not priced too bad and you won't have to wait ages for parts from Japan, or browsing thru Yahoo/Ebay auctions hunting for that hard-to-get 2nd hand parts.

Petrolwise probably not much different, if you drive both cars hard, they'll both swallow a lot. Hell my R33 can be guzzling petrol like a hungry V8, but can be cruising along with a NA V6 economy if I just take it easy.

Potential wise both cars have great potential for mods, but as mods increases, your servicing / maintenance / running cost, etc, would increase as well... it's a rule of thumb basically. But IMO the RB's 6-cyl would be a lot stronger and have more potential to easily make lots of power compared to teh 4-cyl SR. Plus the extra 2 cylinders and 0.5L capacity wins in the torque department. More torque = more fun.

In the end, it's all up to your own preference. Looks, sound of that engine/exhaust note, colours, street cred, whatever turns you on... just choose the car you like and go out there and have fun enjoy it... just be wise and don't end up being a road toll statistic...

Just one thing to add to that post: EXCLUSIVITY

How many R34s do you see on the road compared to the s15... even though it may be 2 years older, the R34 next to a s15 will sure as hell have no problems drawing more attention. Main reason, one is an import - the other is a locally sold vehicle.

However, if attention is not your thing then yeah s15 is the way to go - cheaper too!

people who buy cars to impress other people are sad

Exactly. The reason why I want R34 more over s15 is not cos of its looks (i think s15 looks pretty darn good) but for its practicality and size. Being 6'4 is not the best size for an s15...

Sir-D: At 6'4 i don't really think you'll enjoy the S15 much..The interior of the R34 is much better than the S15. Insurance wise, i've asked Justcar before, the qoute i get for R34 is lower than the ADM S15..i was shocked too, i asked why, they explained that b'cos S15s tend to have more accident claims than R34s.. :lol:

Sir-D: At 6'4 i don't really think you'll enjoy the S15 much..The interior of the R34 is much better than the S15. Insurance wise, i've asked Justcar before, the qoute i get for R34 is lower than the ADM S15..i was shocked too, i asked why, they explained that b'cos S15s tend to have more accident claims than R34s.. :lol:

haha yeah exactly the same here, the R34 with Just cars is 1000 for me to insure full comprehensive! s15 was around the same :angry:

You hit the nail right on the head there, instead of asking us which car is better you should be sticking ur a$$ in a couple and driving them after all you the one you is purchasing the car and if u cant fit in the S15 coz of your height then ur only option is the 34 or another larger import.

I found the S15 to be very agile and very easy to throw around where as the 34 is a lil more solid as with most skyline's coz of there size and weight, both are great cars.

However the NEO motors are not as good as previous RB's

hope that helped :angry:

You hit the nail right on the head there, instead of asking us which car is better you should be sticking ur a$$ in a couple and driving them after all you the one you is purchasing the car and if u cant fit in the S15 coz of your height then ur only option is the 34 or another larger import.

I found the S15 to be very agile and very easy to throw around where as the 34 is a lil more solid as with most skyline's coz of there size and weight, both are great cars.

However the NEO motors are not as good as previous RB's

hope that helped :P

Yeah i wonna actually test drive an R33 GTS-T and R34 GT-T.

Are they as roomy inside as each other or is R34 slightly bigger?

All cars would need a 100k timing belt nonetheless...

Doesn't mean buying S15 there is no 100k timing belt change...

SR20det's have a timing chain which does not require changing.

so you're incorrect with your above statement.

but then again, this shouldn't be a factor in buying a car.

I mean, the belt itself costs less than $100.

so who cares if your 100K service is going to cost $200 more on the RB engine compared to the SR.

Timing chain??? Hm... something new everyday... I haven't seen any cars with timing chain.

SR20det's have a timing chain which does not require changing.

so you're incorrect with your above statement.

but then again, this shouldn't be a factor in buying a car.

I mean, the belt itself costs less than $100.

so who cares if your 100K service is going to cost $200 more on the RB engine compared to the SR.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...