Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I like it. I'll be curious to see what the actual production model turns out like

Well you won't have to wait long. It's being intro'd at this years Tokyo motor show which starts in three days :)

I think that was the production car...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91696-new-gtr/#findComment-1652809
Share on other sites

i'm amazed, it's a complete howler. looks neither like one thing nor another. moon faced at the front and angular at the rear. compared to the new aston vantage it's like something out of a yr 10 art class.

like i said in the skyline general discussion forum, it looks like someone drove it slowly into a wall head-on and left it that way. give it two long white teeth and it'd look like one of those flat / round faced ugly bastard sea lion things. maybe a gummy / pt jackson shark?

rear 1/4 window and pillar are classic Skyline, side on it looks ok too. hopefully they'll have sharpened it up with the real thing.

Edited by GTR32
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91696-new-gtr/#findComment-1652829
Share on other sites

<---Meh - call me a fence sitter. :);)

I"ll wait to see the specs. I can see the influence of 3or4 cars mixed in this - 350z, Rx8 etc and I'd also like to sit in it and touch it.

R ;)

Edited by Sinista32
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91696-new-gtr/#findComment-1652846
Share on other sites

meh, i think its too much like a high end million dollar race car (eg. Pagini Zonda etc....). the GTR is a "poor mans" (this term is used loosely!) Ferrari Enzo, if you ask me. still a great car, in fact, GTR's are an awesome car, but it doesnt have the traditional skyline look. its moved away from the sedan shape styling, which is good, but in this case, they needed to do a little more work......

however, i could grow to like it........ :)

Edited by Frink
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91696-new-gtr/#findComment-1652922
Share on other sites

i'm amazed, it's a complete howler. looks neither like one thing nor another. moon faced at the front and angular at the rear. compared to the new aston vantage it's like something out of a yr 10 art class.

like i said in the skyline general discussion forum, it looks like someone drove it slowly into a wall head-on and left it that way. give it two long white teeth and it'd look like one of those flat / round faced ugly bastard sea lion things. maybe a gummy / pt jackson shark?

rear 1/4 window and pillar are classic Skyline, side on it looks ok too. hopefully they'll have sharpened it up with the real thing.

My god, you really thought deeply about it lol.

Anyway, I usually don't like these new facy space-age things.. but this time I'm impressed

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91696-new-gtr/#findComment-1653047
Share on other sites

i say they should keep the skyline style, if i wanted a 350z id buy one. (well not really but you know what i mean). but im not saying it sucks, ill have to wait and see the specs, and see how it feels, who knows it may be the beez kneez so im put in neutral for now.

well... I did buy a 350Z and I love both. I put a picture of the 350Z next to an R34GTR (two of my favourite cars) mould the two together, make it look a bit more up-market and you have the new GTR.

I personally love it. After recently being jerked around in a big way with my Z I will be going to a different dealership but... where do I sign up for one?

P.S specs in 2 days now :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91696-new-gtr/#findComment-1653492
Share on other sites

350z meets darth vader.....

I dont like 350z's, and really dont like that, is so far from the stylings of the previous models the taillights are the only skyline element left.

R32->r33->r34 was progressive styling changes that all in all worked to a theme.

This thing looks way to space age. This dramatic change in car styling is going on in all marques.

The rear looks ok, i think the boot needs to be lengthened, or the angle of the rear window increased and pushed front ways a touch more, the skylines shouldnt go back to being a hatch.

It needs the squarer skyline stance, lights that run horizontal not vertical at the front, and the lovely open mouth for cooling the FMIC.

But thats just my opinion....

ON a lighter note, the release of a new model pushes previous models price down, come on R34 GTR. But that also means the value of mine will drop to :)

Edited by geordie
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91696-new-gtr/#findComment-1653493
Share on other sites

cars like this usually look better in metal than in the picture! i thought the new rex looked ugly back when offcial pics were released first time, but after seening the real thing at the motor show i actually like the looks of it now.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91696-new-gtr/#findComment-1653511
Share on other sites

i love it

u complain about styling, look at an r34 gtr and a 2000ish pathfinder, headlight and grille are in the same style yet i dont hear u whinging bout that

get a life fcukhead and wake up to the new car, not the old one that everyone loves

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91696-new-gtr/#findComment-1653550
Share on other sites

Whats with you Mr. Testosterone? No need to get agro.

I think it will take time to get used to. I think people are right when they say they dont want a "supercar" look. With what I bet will only be a VQ35DE motor.

I think now the Skyline has lost the RB motors for these new VQ jobs it will lose its once feared image. It was always the hero car from japan! The 2.something litre coupe with some turbos thrown on for more grunt... The kind of milk bottle motor that gets banned from racing with the V8's because its too fast.

This thing better be sporting a turbo or i'm not jumping on the band wagon.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91696-new-gtr/#findComment-1653624
Share on other sites

I'm liking it so far. Sure it's different but that's progress and moving to the future. I'm sure the same thing has bee said by the Japanese in the past with the skyline.

It does still have the elements of the past, but also remember this is supposed to become a standalone supercar, not a hotted up family sedan like in the past. I love all incarnations of the GT-R, this one included. It would be nice to see the Skyline badge continued on it, but that probably wont happen (outside of Japan anyway).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91696-new-gtr/#findComment-1653641
Share on other sites

Just because something is new and improved (hopefully) doesn't mean everyone's gonna love it.

Exhibit A - AU Falcon.

I'm not saying that this is going to be another AU (I bloody well hope not), my point is that not everyone likes a new model.

Most people that don't like the final version initially probably will warm up to it at some stage, most likely after either seeing how it goes or how it sounds :)

It was kind of inevitable that the motor would change, not necessarily that it's not an RB series motor anymore, but more so that they've moved away from the straight 6 to the V6. But then again, it's not a Skyline by name anymore is it.....

My personal view for now is that the front needs a bit of a change

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91696-new-gtr/#findComment-1653697
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...