Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello I have a problem and its really annoying my R32 GTST when cold struggles to get to and past 2000RPM for about 5 min. Like after the car has been sitting for about 5 hours it does this. It is alright in the morning cos I can start it and let it sit for 5 but in the arvo after I have finished school it really pisses me off cos I just wana get out of there. Does anyone kno how I can fix this problem. Any help much appreciated.

Cheers Adrian

dont do wat when it is cold take it past 2 thousand revs :S i mean maybe around 5000 when the turbo starts to make full bost but 2000 is nothin. yeh school i am still at school last year only like 10 school days left cant wait till i finish

OMG I am not a stupid f**k I know you shouldn't drive ya car hard when it is cold and the oil hasn't been spread through out the engine properly and what not that is not the point I am getting at. See can u imagine getting in ya car and driving off and having people up ya ass because your car can not go any faster well that is my problem when cold my car will not go past 2 grand for this reason I don't drive my car when it is cold at all anymore I have to wait at least 4 min around 3 if I am sitting in the car holding it at about 1.5-2 grand. This is not a problem in the morning because I just set the turbo timer to 5 min. But like I said after school I just wana get the hell out of there.

P.S has anyone else had this problem if so how did u fix it.

For god's sake, can people stop just posting crappy guesses all the time.

Change your coolant temperature sensor or have it tested. It alters timing and fuel for the initial warm up. If you have a consult you can trick the computer into thinking it is already warm and the problem goes away.

For god's sake, can people stop just posting crappy guesses all the time.

Change your coolant temperature sensor or have it tested. It alters timing and fuel for the initial warm up. If you have a consult you can trick the computer into thinking it is already warm and the problem goes away.

So you're saying the ecu is retarding the timing and fuel mix because of a faulty temp sensor? I'd have assumed that would govern auto choke and may make it stick on or off but shouldnt stop the car reving over 2k(might go disconnect mine and see what happens ey)..

what does the car do @ 2k? revs bounce around like a limiter? or does it die and flutter like a cold engine with no choke would? also what cold/choke idle speed is it running @?

Does the problem go away the same time the choke switches off?

Mmm the more I analyze it the more I tend to agree...check temp sensor ;)

Hey cheers for the advice i will check the temp sensor. The car at 2k just like dies and flutters like a cold engine would wif no choke. The Choke idle speed is about 1100 revs also when i start it cold it just dies unless i give it a bit of throttle.

Cheers, Adrian

These cars don't have a choke. It's an EFI engine.

The coolant temp sensor richens fuel mixtures and advances timing and also increases the AAC value to increase idle.

It will drive like it is totally doey and if you go past a certain throttle position it will just kick you in the arse and take off. Usually by about 2500. It doesn't always mean that it is a faulty sensor either. Do you have an aftermarket pump or regulator? Have you cleaned your AFM lately? It can cause some similar symptoms.

To test the coolant temp sensor you need an ohmmeter to test resistance between the two pins. not sure of the exact value but I will find out.

Dude, you might wanna check to see if your airflow sensor isnt f**king up, you dont necessarily ave to be blowing out thick smoke as an indication. Go to your local dyno tuner perhaps get em to clean out the system and dyno tune it.

These cars don't have a choke. It's an EFI engine.

The coolant temp sensor richens fuel mixtures and advances timing and also increases the AAC value to increase idle.

bwahahaha I love a good contridiction

Dont be mistaken.. yes it is an efi car :) no it doesnt have a carb or old choke/manual butterfly setup :wub:

But f me if by the ecu monitoring the coolant temp sensor then adjusting the fuel mixtures, timing and also increasing the AAC value to increase idle doesnt in super dooper high tech terms = choke on an efi car

My question was more related to whether the car will infact rev over 2000rpm?

Is it stalling out or is it infact being governed by the ecu because of a faulty temp sensor to a rev limit of 2000rpm as suggested?

The idea the ecu is enforcing a rev limit of 2000rpm until the car reaches operating temp..this being caused from a faulty temp sensor while it still appears to be operating as designed ie: 1100 rpm when cold> 650rpm when warm seems vague to me, never new it had this capability..

Anyway goodluck

Oh out of interest can you set a rev limit as well as time duration on your turbo timer?

bwahahaha I love a good contridiction

Dont be mistaken.. yes it is an efi car  :)  no it doesnt have a carb or old choke/manual butterfly setup  :wub:

But f me if by the ecu monitoring the coolant temp sensor then adjusting the fuel mixtures, timing and also increasing the AAC value to increase idle doesnt in super dooper high tech terms = choke on an efi car

My question was more related to whether the car will infact rev over 2000rpm?

Is it stalling out or is it infact being governed by the ecu because of a faulty temp sensor to a rev limit of 2000rpm as suggested?

The idea the ecu is enforcing a rev limit of 2000rpm until the car reaches operating temp..this being caused from a faulty temp sensor while it still appears to be operating as designed ie: 1100 rpm when cold> 650rpm when warm seems vague to me, never new it had this capability..

Anyway goodluck

Oh out of interest can you set a rev limit as well as time duration on your turbo timer?

Since when was it a contradiction? IT HAS NO CHOKE

The word "choke" refers to its method of "choking" air to the system thus creating a richer mixture helping with the warm up.

EFI cars use a cold start setting which, effectively, achieves the same outcome but by DIFFERENT methods. It INCREASES timing - a choke does not do that. It INCREASES the feed of air into the system - a choke does the total opposite.

So can you call an apple an orange?

....I didn't think so :);):blink:

On a second note, have you actually offered a solution to the problem or are you just pissing in the wind like most others?

I have offered a testing solution with values - if it tests ok then we will move on to the next likely problem, until then - go and read a book!

Edited by 3LIT3 FORS3

Pedantic or contrary?? which do you prefer?

On a second note, have you actually offered a solution to the problem or are you just pissing in the wind like most others?

I have offered a testing solution with values - if it tests ok then we will move on to the next likely problem, until then - go and read a book!

In answer to this no.......if the guy with the problem would actually answer whether the car is in fact stalling out or being electronically governed as suggested I would happly give a suggestion or 2..

until then i'll re-iterate...The idea the ecu is enforcing a rev limit of 2000rpm until the car reaches operating temp..this being caused from a faulty temp sensor while it still appears to be operating as designed ie: 1100 rpm when cold> 650rpm when warm seems vague to me, never new it had this capability..

If it were my car i'd start by looking @ the aac valve but hey im no 3|173 45I<1|\| so wadda I know eh?

Until then i'll continue to read a book. may I suggest for yourself maybe try taking a deep breath, count to 10 or maybe just stfu and eat a sandwich or something.. :lol: wah!!

Edited by madbung
until then i'll re-iterate...The idea the ecu is enforcing a rev limit of 2000rpm until the car reaches operating temp..this being caused from a faulty temp sensor while it still appears to be operating as designed ie: 1100 rpm when cold> 650rpm when warm seems vague to me, never new it had this capability..

The Coolant Temp Sensor effects more than just idle you twit. I thought I explained that earlier. When you understand BASIC principles, then you can come back and offer some assistance.

BTW don't tell me to stfu, I am here to help people with GENUINE answers, not just make stupid smilies to make fun of people and repeat what help I have already given, then go back and edit your posts to start arguments.

wah!!

Sadly I can't help your lack of comprehension..

Pls continue, feel free.. rage away..your paranoid sense of persecution is pretty amusing.

BTW don't tell me to stfu, I am here to help people with GENUINE answers, not just make stupid smilies to make fun of people and repeat what help I have already given, then go back and edit your posts to start arguments

seriously wtf?? I would have thought suggesting a more logical place to start diagnostics would be a welcome assistance. As I said before I don't think the ecu rev limits the car @ 2000rpm when you have a faulty temp sensor. Can't agree? Don't agree?..I don't care either way.

My post was in response to Taipan's prob, I don't think the temp sensor is the most logical place to start... you say it is..I say it isn't.

I understand you put a lot of thought into your diagnostics and are trying to help but seriously after reading one of your "helpful" posts yesterday I'm full of doubt about your capacity for anything other than inane comments like this one clicky

BTW I still think you should try taking a deep breath, count to 10 or maybe just stfu and eat a sandwich or something.. wah!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...