Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Matty, I'm not sure you really read this thread all the way though. I didn't approach my regular mechanic about this problem first. I took it to so-called 'specialists' because I assumed (incorrectly) that my mechanic only looked after the engine side of things. So he's not to blame. Each suspension place was taking pot-shots and replacing a few parts like you describe. It wasn't until I visited my usual mechanic, who took two goes, and replaced parts that needed it on both attempts, that the problem was found. And anyway, it wasn't tie-rods. I don't know where you got that from - the steering rack was slightly bent, not visible without pulling it all out. Even he said noone would have seen it unless they pulled the whole suspension apart, and the reason he did so was because I said 'fix it no matter what', when all the other places either replaced the simplest thing they could think of as the cause, or only replaced one small problem I had, leaving other major things unfixed (eg the front end of the bumpstops).

Of course I would have liked if someone saw the bent rack to start with, but I'm not complaining like people on ACA. Just telling people on here my story so they can know what else to look for with wheel shakes, cos EVERYONE just kept telling me it was my wheel alignment, when 3 or 4 places had already aligned it.

Cheers.

Hey Sleepy, wasn't taking a pot shot at you, you just wanted your car fixed. I was taking about the people that kept guessing. I assumed you meant tie-rods when you said it was bent, as I've never seen a bent rack?!?! How was it bent have you got picks? and what effect did this play in the reason for your steering shaking?

Cheers

NP Matty. The main reason I updated this thread is cos I linked somone else with high speed shaked to it, and wanted to add a little more info. Save others some time and pain! The most important part, as you said, is a knowledgeable mechanic/suspension guy.

I think the rack itself was bent... The part with the 'peanuts', as Homer Simpson would say haha.. I'm not 100% on the details, I just know he said that noone, no matter how good they were, would have found it without pulling it out. He said he was getting an intermittent "clunk" when he played with the steering rack manually. It clunked about 1/3 of the time, so I was pretty sure it needed reconditioning. Was only very clear when he pulled it out. In fact, the reconditioning place were the ones to tell him it was bent, maybe he couldn't even see it himself, but had the right suspicions. So I don't have any pics.

The main effect of the bent rack was very subtle *shivering* through the steering wheel at any speed, and intermittently when hitting 80-100kph or more, and sometimes when braking, the wheel would shake violently in my hands, like you get when you're braking heavily and the brake pads are completely shot. But it's all gone away now (can't imagine my relief after so long). With all the stuff I've had replaced, you should feel how it drives now lol go-kart :D

Edited by sl33py
  • 2 weeks later...

i wonnna know if you could know what might be the cause of this problem like how you get that damage if it impossible or possible, could it have been a smashed up car and only just fixed to get it RW and on the road asap for sale???? just wondering.

i wonnna know if you could know what might be the cause of this problem like how you get that damage if it impossible or possible, could it have been a smashed up car and only just fixed to get it RW and on the road asap for sale???? just wondering.

I noticed the problems precisely from the moment I drove the car out of Jax Quickfit. I have NO doubt in my mind that they caused it, by A) selling me out of round tyres, B) poor setup/balancing of all wheels, and most significantly, a SERIOUS knock to my steering rack (educated guess) at some point in the proceedings. I've had one mate who watched a different workshop attempt to lift his GF's car, with the hoist positioned squarely under the steering rack. Oil all over the floor and bent parts galore. I wouldn't be surprised if something like this happened, just to a lesser degree, and they thought I wouldn't notice.

  • 4 months later...

Sorry to dig this up but i just wanted to thank sl33py for a new idea!! will check this at first chance.. all the symptoms fit and i even had shitty tires which pulled me to the left, and maybe they have bent the rack..

proper tires on now, and it drives straight but still shudders as u describe..

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...