Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Item: Complete AMD+3000 system

- Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-SLI + GV-3D1 Package

* Include Dual GeForce 6600 GT Series, total 256MB

- AMD +3000 939 sckt Winchester core

- Zalman CNPS7000B-CU with fanmate 2 controller (Copper base)

- Corsair 2 x 512mb PC-3200 C2 ver 1.5 with black heat spreader

- Western Digital 200gb Sata hard disk 8MB cache (WD2000JD-00GBB0)

- Liteon DVD burner (SOHW-812S) (black color)

- 1.44MB floppy disk drive (beige color)

- Antec Plus 1080AMG (Silver color)

- Antec TP2-550-EPS12V (24 pin)

- Vision Plus HDTV tunner card with remote control

System run @ 250Mhz OC stable

Note: No monitor, keyboard, mouse, speaker include.

Location: Item locate in Sydney

Item Condition:Used, under 6-months. Does not come with reciept, due to custom built over times

Reason for Selling:My system is up for sale, as busy with other thing I don't have times to utlilize it .

Price and Payment Conditions:$1400 ONO, pickup only

Extra Info: Basically the system used for games, and internet surfing, office use and multimedia

Contact Details: Either PM or email at [email protected] for furthur info

Edited by sybrix
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94555-complete-amd3000-system-cheap/
Share on other sites

I think you should check the value of your parts at a few stores.

eg. http://www.msy.com.au/Parts/PARTS.pdf

Your parts are worth about 800ish brand new with 1 year warantee.

So depending on how quicky you want it sold you might want to revise your price between 500-700.

I think you should check the value of your parts at a few stores.

eg. http://www.msy.com.au/Parts/PARTS.pdf

Your parts are worth about 800ish brand new with 1 year warantee.

So depending on how quicky you want it sold you might want to revise your price between 500-700.

Still for sale anyone interest ??? Anyway do more research before comparing with msy. as Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-SLI + GV-3D1 Package worth alone $600 & the ram is not value ram. Any Q's please don't hesistate to ASK.

Edited by sybrix
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...