Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think Sydneykid said if your engine is into boost at freeway cruise speeds , like every time you breath on the pedal for a hill , the consumption will be poor .

Cubes may have found by using the larger turbine housing the boost threshold is higher and exhaust restriction lower . If the final drive was raised to 3.7/3.9 the car could use the extra torque it makes at lower revs to get better mileage .

O/T but notice how the R34 GTt uses propper variable cam timing and makes good torque even with the larger turbine housing . The effective or dynamic CR is probably better that the GTS25T at the low end so does not need the early onset of boost to get it going . Has anyone compared consumption on a 33 and a 34 ?

I'd like to know what the aftermarket VCT does to a GTR from a power and consumption point of view .

Cheers A .

bloody hell, im running a stock r33 s2 with just 4" exhaust (from 3"cat) 10psi boost and power fc and i can only get 360 k's out of it max even driving like a ganny most the time

you guys reckon the big exhaust has somehtnig to do with this or not?

Hi there,

No don't think the exhaust has anything to do with it.

More than likely that your tune isn't the best - I doubt it would be the oxygen sensor (please correct me if I'm wrong!) as with mine turned off at light to moderate loads the AFR's are pretty much the same as with it on. It would be interesting if you could go for a drive with a lambda sensor to see what's going on - getting that done at a shop would probably end up paying for itself with the fuel you may save.

Something I did notice about the other guys I went on the cruise with is that they are always in a low gear giving it a rev.

No good for economy.

Strange that you get such bad economy with a 10 psi tune though - who ever tuned it wouldn't have had to change the maps too much and mine got excellent fuel economy with the factory apexi maps!

Cheers

Hi there,

No don't think the exhaust has anything to do with it.

More than likely that your tune isn't the best - I doubt it would be the oxygen sensor (please correct me if I'm wrong!) as with mine turned off at light to moderate loads the AFR's are pretty much the same as with it on. It would be interesting if you could go for a drive with a lambda sensor to see what's going on - getting that done at a shop would probably end up paying for itself with the fuel you may save.

Something I did notice about the other guys I went on the cruise with is that they are always in a low gear giving it a rev.

No good for economy.

Strange that you get such bad economy with a 10 psi tune though - who ever tuned it wouldn't have had to change the maps too much and mine got excellent fuel economy with the factory apexi maps!

Cheers

Mercury tuned it, twice actually lol, wasnt all that happy with the first but they werent able to do a road test/tune, n still not fully satisfied, but will wait til i get the fmic on n go back.

Also we had huge problems with it running heaps rich, but it should be fixed now, also when i put the new dump pipe on the 02 sensor was chalked up with heaps of carbon, but i cleaned it all up n looks ok

lambda sensor what is it n what does it do?

P.S. sorry for highjacking the thread :lol:

Mercury tuned it, twice actually lol, wasnt all that happy with the first but they werent able to do a road test/tune, n still not fully satisfied, but will wait til i get the fmic on n go back.

Also we had huge problems with it running heaps rich, but it should be fixed now, also when i put the new dump pipe on the 02 sensor was chalked up with heaps of carbon, but i cleaned it all up n looks ok

lambda sensor what is it n what does it do?

P.S. sorry for highjacking the thread  :lol:

Lambda sensor is one of those sniffer things the dyno guys put up the exhaust so they can check what the air/fuel ratios are.

Id say you'll get better economy with an intercooler and dump.

If it was running heaps rich then maybe your O2 sensor is buggered.

getting about 1.2ltrs per 1.1kms at morgan park on the weekend. rb25det with about 350hp @ rears...almost always on boost...martini 110 race fuel...expensive shit..and we went through it like no tomorrow..used about 80-90 litres for about 79 laps. lol 150 bux per 20ltr drum.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...