Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

newkleer - download some of the chip reprogramming tools if you haven't already, and have a bit of a look through.

There is a universal "K" constant as part of the ECU, which can be used to apply more or less fueling across the board and is used to adjust for say larger injectors. One of the programs (I forget which) can automatically do it all for you, just depending on the injectors CC's you enter.

Also refer here...

http://www.boostcruising.com/silvia/eprom.asp

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

thanks for that. looks like what you would normally change the K value by is what you can apply via consult. but this bit im not sure if you could do anything about:

Also, I used the correction of 0.849 to all the values in the 'boost' section along the bottom of the fuel maps. You will find that once you adjust all those values, and then click Setup - Engine Specification setup, and adjust the Injector Blas-off quantity to the injector size that you are now using, all the values will come back to normal compared to the original map with uncorrected values and standard injector size spec).

that "blas-off" is what i was referring to as "opening time" - i guess it depends on how different they are as to whether its significant (and what the value is used for). perhaps 370->440 wouldnt be too bad, but issues with higher (eg 550)?

The k is the main multiply as most of you may already know.

It just richens or leans out the whole a/f's across the board of the fuel maps etc. For every number increase or decrease it will richen or lean out the overall fueling by 0.1 of a fuel ratio.

So up the k by 10 ( in dec) will up it by 1 afr.

The blast off time or void as its allso know as is the extra pulse width to the injectors that is added too the start and the finnish of the base pulswidth of the injector.

It barely effects the ratios up in the revs under load but it affect the mixture at idle quite dramticly.

For every number up or down it richens or leans out the A/f at idle by 0.1 of a ratio.

Just clearing a few things up with the stock ecu.

makes sense that higher duty cycle less impact the blast off time would have.

what do you think the result would be with leaving blast off time for the 370, while using 440 injectors? (assuming you fix the K via consult). would it idle well enough?

what percentage of typical idle injector pulse width is likely to be blast off time?

Sorry, I still don't get it.......let me try one question at a time.

My PDA still has ALL of my normal PDA functions...it is not just EcuXtend. When I leave the car I throw it in my bag. Same as i did before I had this ecuXtend software on it!!

What happens if you don't plug the PDA back in?

:D cheers :D

Hi Sydney Kid,

If you dont have the PDA plugged into the car, you car will simply run off the ecu's original settings.

With the PDA plugged in, you car car will use the setting you had when you turned it off.

Caz.. )

Sorry, I still don't get it.......let me try one question at a time.

What happens if you don't plug the PDA back in?

:D cheers :D

makes sense that higher duty cycle less impact the blast off time would have.

what do you think the result would be with leaving blast off time for the 370, while using 440 injectors? (assuming you fix the K via consult). would it idle well enough?

what percentage of typical idle injector pulse width is likely to be blast off time?

Not much I'd say. All it will do is run a little rich at idle.

From past experience all I did was Once I set up the K to run the correct afr under load etc I just adjusted the void to run the afr of 14.7:1 as it should be according to the fuel map correction values.

Just think of the void as an idle mixture setting.

have made a bit more progress on software, see attachment

need to add a digital reading to the bottom of the gauges, after i do that will try to make it able to go into "full screen", then move on to active tests. gauges were made so that the same gauge can be used in pocketpc app (hence why it looks a bit basic)

post-4553-1134907472.jpg

colours that make up the gauges would be easy to change (something id add later on), but the structure of the gauge itself would be harder to change. a background image would also be hard given the gauge sizes change depending on how many gauges you have (to maximise the amount of screen used for the gauges)

added digital value to gauges and made it full-screen-able (though not sure many people have car computers, but thought itd be good anyway to use up all screen real-estate)

have a list of todo things on my website, whats there should take long enough to do, but if theres any notable omissions of features i should look at let me know

post-4553-1135601413.jpg

  • 4 weeks later...

128%! weeee!

Lookin' good, Pete!

You know what i'd really LOVE?

1) To choose which and how many guages show up. (and for them to re-align depending on window/screen size)

2) To have the program start up and connect to the ECU automatically, and start monitoring, and in full-screen.

3) To show boost from the MAP sensor or something... it doesn't come through the consult port, does it?

Anyhoo... if those things existed, then I could finally justify building my car pc with a 7" widescreen touchscreen! =-D

1) does that :D

it automatically works out the best config (eg rows x cols) for the amount of gauges you have to maximise the amount of screen area the gauges take up. if u have 1 gauge itll be full screen for that single gauge, 4 and theyll take up roughly 1/4 screen each. on a widescreen with 6 then id have 2 rows of 3 gauges to fill it out nicely. so will take care of widescreens no probs!

2) good idea, ill add that to the list - would be good for anyone thats smart enough to get a car pc going :D

3) cant do that unfortunately, youll have to stick to traditional gauge for boost

Edited by NewKleer

Hmm... some excellent work, Pete! On a 7" wide, 3 across looks to be the goods!

I can live without the boost reading I guess. =-/

When is a beta available of your software?

Additionally... has anyone ever tried to emulate the R34's digital screen? I think it would be appealing. =-]

(especially if someone could mount the 7" widescreen in one of those triple-guage clusters that are moulded to look like the stock R34 cluster)

better to look at what each individual thing does then try and compare them like that

with consult you can view all of the cars main sensors, change fuel injection time/static ignition timing across the rev range (which ecuextend does can do all)

an safc has multiple mapping points (as opposed to the global change), but works on tricking the ecu into thinking there is more/less air then there really is, so the downside is that incorrect ignition timing is used (which with slight adjustments, hardly matters, but problems arise if ur trying to go from eg 9:1 afr up to 12:1)

and an rsm (i think) uses an accelerometer in order to measure acceleration, and thus speed, distance (which can be worked out with acceleration + time).

thus anything via consult and rsm/safc only have a single overlap in they both show RPM - slight overlap in that they display/work out speed (via different methods) and can change amount of fuel that goes in (via entirely different methods again).

Edited by NewKleer

Thanks NewKleer, :)

better to look at what each individual thing does then try and compare them like that

with consult you can view all of the cars main sensors, change fuel injection time/static ignition timing across the rev range (which ecuextend does can do all)

an safc has multiple mapping points (as opposed to the global change), but works on tricking the ecu into thinking there is more/less air then there really is, so the downside is that incorrect ignition timing is used (which with slight adjustments, hardly matters, but problems arise if ur trying to go from eg 9:1 afr up to 12:1)

and an rsm (i think) uses an accelerometer in order to measure acceleration, and thus speed, distance (which can be worked out with acceleration + time).

thus anything via consult and rsm/safc only have a single overlap in they both show RPM - slight overlap in that they display/work out speed (via different methods) and can change amount of fuel that goes in (via entirely different methods again).

I've been considering developing an ECU/PC interface and consult software for quite some time now. Reading this post has encouraged me to begin writing an application for the linux platform, mainly out of curiousity.

Which may or may not interest anyone on this forum, however if successful; linux would potentially allow me to offer a freely available in-dash ECU management + multimedia + navigation package, that will be able to take advantage of existing technology (i.e. mini-PC, touchscreen LCD, consult<->RS232 cable, GPS receiver)

For now though, it's still a pipe dream!

PS. Any idea where to read the G-sensor from the ECU? That'd be neat!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • My goals for it atm are to get it registered, respray and some mild power gains eventually... I picked up the car from an elderly gentleman near the border of NSW and VIC, its honestly a bit rough and looks like its been driven on a farm (because there was so much dirt underneath). Last week I dropped the subframe and emptied the old fuel out + added a new fuel pump (think the old one went bad from old fuel). Now I'm onto fixing a coolant leak at the rear of the engine + adding a new radiator as the old one is corroded. After that i have a new bumper, coils (as the old were leaking) and lots more
    • Welcome buddy! Plenty on here and YouTube. What are your plans for it? Good luck with the Rwc and Rego bud!
    • Love this so much! Please post a photo when you have a bike on the trailer.  I was a little bit worried about having a tow bar on the Skyline, but having it hidden behind the number plate is genius
    • Came here to say, put all the wiring from the new motor and gearbox in that you can, then throw the stock ECUs in the bin, and get an aftermarket ECU. Should be pretty easy if you can use a multimeter and read a wiring diagram to then use a PNP aftermarket ECU to suit the motors wiring loom, and make the minimal changes you will to get it to work in with the body loom (If any). This will mean you can very easily circumvent/bypass the Park/Neutral start disable switch, and get everything running really easy!
    • If the roof is dual skinned the whole way, IE, there's a "top" metal piece, and a "bottom" metal piece, to slow it down as much as you practically can, you should be able to get an attachment for a spray can/your spray gun, where it is a long, thin flexible hose, and when you're "spraying" it is spraying it in every direction possible. The I'd get that, and feed it through the roof as much and as far as you can. It's basically like fish oiling the car, but you're soaking it in rust converter. Then do the fix like Murray has described having cleaned up the existing metal as much as you humanly can. I'd also throw as much rust converter on that exposed metal before putting the fibreglass/metal filler over everything.   As for welding a replacement in. I've owned my own MIG welder for about 10 years. I've also worked in an industry doing MIG welding for a job for about 3 months dead straight, and we were doing 11.5 hour work days 5 days a week, plus a Saturday 6 hour day. (I then moved over to running the massive CNC plasma as I could understand the technology, and work with the main guy out there). I also f**k around with my welders a bit at home. So what I'm saying here is, I've probably got more hours on a MIG gun than you'll manage to get under your sleeve doing home sorts of jobs over the next 5 years. I also have an ACDC TIG that I got myself a year or two back. I've got a short amount of experience on the TIG only. My home MIG is also presently setup for doing thin sheet metal. Unless I didn't care about how that roof looked, and I just wanted a functional metal roof, and it being out of alignment, warped, and bowed, I would NOT attempt a roof replacement UNLESS I could do it as a whole panel like Murray described where the spot welds were.  Welding has this REALLY annoying thing, where if you want something to be perfectly square, unless you can clamp that thing to damn perfection (Welding fixture table), it is NOT going to be square, so you start to learn, the type of metal you're working with, how thick it is etc, and weld in VERY specific ways, and by knowing how YOU are as a welder, so that as the welds cool, the metal work pulls itself into place. If you want to see some cool tricky shit done, Bennets Customs is an Aussie guy, and he mentions a guy a lot call "Kyle", who is from "Make It Kustom". Watch some of their welding videos, especially on sheet metal. You can use the welder to shrink the steel in, and you can also use the welder to stretch the panel out. When you have the skill level that I have, you can shrink the metal in and out... But never on purpose like those two guys do. You just manage to f**k it all up. Then I smack it around with a hammer till it sits lower than I will want it too, then I shove filler on top and then pray to deitys that I can sand it into some form of sane shape that doesn't look like a dog has taken a shit, after eating a tonne of pumice stone... I'm all for DIY, and for learning, and please, feel free to give it a go, but be aware, you need to live with the consequences of how time consuming it is to do, AND that it's going to look no where near as good as what you can make it look with just some filler now. Oh AND, even once you replace it, it's like to still rust away again eventually, because you'll have missed putting primer and paint on some part of the newly welded in sheet metal, or against part of the existing metal you couldn't get to...   Oh, and to weld all that in, you will need to pull the window out, and strip at least the roof and A Pillars of interior trim and wiring. You'll then need things like the big fire proof/weld spatter proof mats to lay down, OR you'll end up needing to strip the ENTIRE interior to avoid sending it all up in a ball of flames. If you want to see how annoying sheet metal is to weld, head to bunnings, buy there 600x600 1.6mm mild steel (Not GAL!) sheet, and cut a few pieces, and try and weld them together. Then understand, 1.6mm sheet is nearly 50 to 100% THICKER than the cars sheet metal.   The photos I posted before, I'm replacing with 1.2mm thick mild sheet, and it's very easy to blow through both the original steel (Especially if I hit an area that should have probably been cut out a bit more) or straight through the new sheet metal. And I'm doing the floor, which can be hidden easily, and doesn't matter how pretty I make it, as long as it's damn strong! I'm also doing it in a 4WD, that has seen many off road trails, and doesn't need to look that pretty ever
×
×
  • Create New...