Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I recently just took my car to an auto elecy and he said there is nothing wrong with my air con, but there could be somthing wrong with my computer? Ive thought of putting my pfc in to see if that'll make it work. Anyone had this problem or know how to fix it? I have a 32 GTR

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97127-aircon-not-working-because-of-ecu/
Share on other sites

Reviewing the wiring diagrams and ECU input/output signals, there are 2 wires on the ECU that interact with the A/C namely pin 46 (A/C switch signal) and pin 9 (A/C cut signal).

It appears that when the A/C button is pressed the ECU detects this via pin 46 and responds by earthing the A/C relay signal wire (pin 9) which controls (in part) the operation of the A/C compressor.

I say "in part" because the A/C relay signal wire first passes through a dual pressure switch before arriving at pin 9 on the ECU (ie dual pressure switch is in series with pin 9). This inevitably is to ensure that the A/C system has adequate gas pressure before allowing the compressor to switch on.

I think the pressure switch is located on the A/C filter canister which resides in front of the radiator on the drivers side. Provided the system is gassed the compressor should switch on when pin 9 earths the A/C relay signal wire.

Assuming the PFC controls the A/C in the same manner as the factory computer (I would be surprised if it didn't) then plugging the PFC in may help to eliminate the ECU as a possible cause of the problem.

Failing this you can check the voltages at pin 46 and pin 9 before and after the A/C button is pressed and check what the ECU is doing.

I hope this helps.

Cheers

Thanks for the Detailed reply. I will have to plug in the pfc and see what happens, just got to get around to it. The auto elecy was pretty certain it had somthing to do with the computer in it because he actually got it working by bridging it out or somthing at the computer. So with what your saying, sounds like it could be the computer. But i'll have to find out. Thanks again

Cheers

You need to first check that the computer is receiving the aircon request signal from the switch/climate control.

If the ecu input is seeing the request signal, but not operating you then need to check that the other side of the circuit is fine. To do this just switch the output side at the ecu and confirm that it all starts working. (This will rule out things like high/low pressure swicthes)

If that makes it work, then the ecu is the culprit.

Rather then replace the ecu, I would just wire up an extra relay to bypass the computer.

I would still provide the ecu with the switched aircon request signal though, so that it changes the idle strategy for AC mode.

This is basically the same as what was said above, but i wanted to point out that you really only need to test the two sides of the ecu to quickly narrow where the problem lies, you can then narrow it from there.

Im sure your auto elec knows what he is on about.

Ok that makes heaps of sense. But i was just thinking of putting my PFC in to see if it works, and if the air con works, i wont bother getting anything fixed until i go and get my car tuned. Ive had it sitting around for about 3 months now, just finishing off my engine still. But i thought i'd fix a few bugs first. Ive never actually pulled out the computer before, but im guessing it'd be alot easier just switching it then checking all those things youve just said?

Cheers

  • 1 year later...

Draggin up an old post I know but am wondering if the dual pressure switch would prevent the aircon from switching on after having the gas updated to r134 (i think that is what it is) I have been told that r134 is a higher head pressure than the older r12 that the system was designed to run. Does the switch only work if the pressure is to low or will it switch/not switch if pressure is to high as well. Going to have a chat with the local aircon guy tomorrow so will post back any findings Just thought someone on here may be able to confirm my suspicions

  • 3 years later...

Bumping an old thread.

Can the low pressure switch itself fail? I have had the gas checked and there is plenty in there, everything seems to be operating the way it should be but the clutch on the compressor wont engage.

If I earth the low pressure switch it will engage the compressor and work properly so is it possible that the switch itself is f**ked and thinks there is low gas when there actually isn't?

Edited by PM-R33
  • 3 weeks later...

Checking the low pressure switch with a multimeter will answer your question

Should see a circuit, alternatively earth the other side of the switch, car side, that will prove it as well.

Next step back is pin 9 I think on the ecu, hopefully you dont have the problem I do with the ecu not earthing that output

I ended up sorting it out :ermm:

Turned out to be a bad connection from the ECU to the Aircon output wire. Even though the ECU said it was switching, in reality it wasn't.

I traced the wire back and found where the connection had broken.

Once I changed the settings on the Vipec to make sure it was swtiching the correct way it kicked in and started working.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...