Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Now that I have brand new splitfire coils, can i revert back to 1.1mm spark plug gaps or not ?

I've read a bit of stuff on here on the forum, and some people have said that at 1.1mm the spark is a lot better on good coils than it is on 0.8mm gapped plugs. Question is, at 1.3 bar of boost with the amount of fuel i am running, will plugs at 1.1mm run fine or not.

Does anyone know?

I'm tempted to run standard gapped plugs, with maybe a colder heat range? (7 or 8's), before the car gets its final tune on saturday

Many thanks for any help

:D

well if its missing its obviously not right.

you'll soon tell.

With new coils it might be ok.

Just drop it increment at a time if you have problems. Might take a couple of hours. Just make sure ya havea few beers :D

What you mean not a good answer! Every car is different.

You dont need a dyno to check it, just 2-3 hours and a quick squirt once its warm each time :D

If its missing under boost sometimes going 1.0 to 0.8 makes all the difference

are you endorsing me drink driving ?

I think the biggest issue, is that it would need to be a squirt up the top of 3rd or in 4th gear and that = 180+

Just playin with ya. I know that this would be the easiest way of doing it. But is it worth wasting my time doing this ? As in have you or anyone seen any benefits to increasing gap ?

Maybe not better performance, but a stronger spark. If you think about it, the larger the distance between the spark plug gap thingy (whatever you wanna call it), the larger the spark will be. Larger spark = better combustion.

Its just a thought. Im just not sure whether splitfires (which i would assume are simply brand new nissan-ish coils - they wouldnt be any better spec than brand new stock coils - provie me wrong) with stock distributor will provide a big enough spark at a 1.1mm gap to withstand 1.3 bar and 3.8L of fuel/minute :D

its been proven splitfires/nissan new are virtually the same.

There was a thread with tech info about 6 months ago.

Its more the fact your using new coils vs your tired ones.

As opposed to who made em, which is better etc

Splitfires are cheaper than new ones from nissan, so thats why people use em, no other reason :D

Ok I tried a new set of Splitfires & they were "marginally" better than a 12 year old set of RB26 standard coils - I doubt if they would be any better than new oem coils. I could increase my gap from 0.6mm to 0.635mm on platinum plugs (copper plugs could run 0.8mm no problems). As to what gap you can run trial & error worked for me, you will be able to run a larger gap using copper plugs.

tommy, there is no distributor on a GTR mate. it's multi coil. :)

the bigger the spark gap you can run the better, i would think if your old coils were good then you probably wont get much gain. but if you previously closed down the gaps due to missing then you may be able to open them back up now. i would try .9 or 1.0. but i don't think you'll be able to go much more than that as 1.3 bar is pretty decent boost.

Well ive actually tried this method after fitting my Splitfires. I went back to 1.1 gap and it started to missfire, 1.0 still misfirred, and finally .85 mm is where i absolutely get no misfire running around 19psi boost, so i have found my optimum spark gap.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 1.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 😃  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
×
×
  • Create New...