Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

was informed last night at willowbank test n tune (same as a street meet in sydney) that as the andra rule book currently states if you run 11.99 or faster you now require a 4 point saftey harness!

Apparantly a rule thats been in there for a little while and hasnt been enforced.

They was also on top of alot of the saftey stuff last night, pretty much actually checking every helmet had the sticker to show it met aussie standards etc.

Ah well just a shout out so everyone knows. Get yourself a harness.

btw i ran 11.41 @ 124mph gotta get tires its all over for me. lol

;)

mick

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98505-new-rules-for-1199-and-under/
Share on other sites

Hi All,

was informed last night at willowbank test n tune (same as a street meet in sydney) that as the andra rule book currently states if you run 11.99 or faster you now require a 4 point saftey harness!

Apparantly a rule thats been in there for a little while and hasnt been enforced.

They was also on top of alot of the saftey stuff last night, pretty much actually checking every helmet had the sticker to show it met aussie standards etc.

Ah well just a shout out so everyone knows. Get yourself a harness.

btw i ran 11.41 @ 124mph gotta get tires its all over for me. lol

;)

mick

Yeah Mick...its an old rule, and i think someone from up that way stirred it up. Will be enforeced from now on.

Congrats on your 11.4...well done

yeh thats what it seemes like.

looks as if they was on a saftey rampage. lol

which if you ask me is fair enough.

re my time, yeh im really struggling getting off the line need to ditch my street tires and get some semis.

http://www.gunnamotorsport.com/vids/wrxkilla32gtr20.WMV

this is marc jacobson i missed 3rd and went 11.7

http://www.gunnamotorsport.com/vids/wrxkilla32gtr22.WMV

solo run i another 11.4

hey morgs yeh

but as demonstrated in that thread i had back then, you have to look at my dyno graph.

With an old school to4r (mine has 0.96too)its very laggy and doesnt make great accross the range power like the t04z say.

so peak power accross the gears is low. it only makes the peak power for a small amount of time in high rpm. so its not ideal.

it was tuned yesterday before the track with 398kw at 4 on 18psi wastegate pressure.

Hopefully with some practise, tires, i can get some higher 12xs mph

its a step by step

getting there

mick

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...